The micro-structural strain response of tendon
- 698 Downloads
Tendons are multi-level fibre-reinforced composites, designed to transmit muscle forces to the skeleton. During physiological loading, tendons experience tensile loads, which are transmitted through the structure to the cells, where they may initiate mechanotransduction pathways. The current study examines the structural reorganisation and resulting local strain fields within the tendon matrix under tensile load. It uses confocal microscopy to photobleached a grid onto the collagen and image its deformation under the application of incremental tensile strain. Six parameters are used to quantify fibril and fibre movement and examine the mechanisms of extension employed by fascicles.
Results demonstrated an inhomogeneous strain response throughout the matrix and large variability between samples. Local strains in the loading axis were significantly smaller than the applied values. However, large compressive strains, perpendicular to the loading axis, were recorded. The average Poisson’s ratio (0.8) suggested cells may experience significant compression during loading. Deflection of the grid lines, indicating sliding between collagen fibres, and rotation of the grid were also recorded. These data highlight the non-homogenous strain environment of fascicles and provide further evidence for fibre sliding under tensile load. They also suggested a rotary component to tendon response, which may indicate a helical organisation to the tendon matrix.
KeywordsFibril Collagen Fibril Acridine Orange Strain Increment Applied Strain
Many thanks to Dr. Martin Knight, for his expert advice and assistance with the confocal microscopy.
- 1.Woo SLY (1982) Biorheology 19:385Google Scholar
- 2.Harris B (1980) Symp Soc Exp Biol 34:37Google Scholar
- 4.Benjamin M, Ralphs JR (1997) Histol Histopathol 12:1135Google Scholar
- 5.Ker RF (2002) CBPA 133:987Google Scholar
- 14.Screen HR, Lee DA, Bader DL, Shelton JC (2004) J Eng Med 218:109Google Scholar
- 15.Scott JE, Orford R (1981) Biochem J 197:573Google Scholar
- 16.Scott JE (2003) J Physiol 55:2–335Google Scholar
- 23.Bruehlmann SB, Kelly EJ, Duncan NA (2005) Trans Orthop Res Soc 30:389Google Scholar
- 27.Davison PF, Galbavy EJ (1985) Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 26:1202Google Scholar
- 29.Petrán M, Boyde A, Hadravsky M (1990) In: Confocal microscopy. Academic Press, London, vol 9, p 262Google Scholar
- 31.Lanir Y, Salant EL, Foux A (1988) Biorheology 25:591Google Scholar
- 33.Knight MM, van de Breevaart Bravenboor J, Lee DA, van Osch GJVM, Weinans H, Bader DL (2002) Biochim Biophys Acta 1570:1Google Scholar