Advertisement

Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 41, Issue 6, pp 1745–1756 | Cite as

Mechanical behaviour of polyethylene terephthalate & polyethylene naphthalate fibres under cyclic loading

  • C. Lechat
  • A. R. Bunsell
  • P. Davies
  • A. Piant
Article

Abstract

Polyethylene naphthalate (PEN) fibres possess a higher initial stiffness than that of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) fibres and this makes them an attractive competitor for use in mooring ropes and other applications for which a low compliance would be an advantage. The two types of fibres have been characterised and compared in tension, creep and fatigue and found to behave in very similar ways. Failure of both fibres results in similar fracture morphologies although under high cyclic loading a new failure process has been observed for the PEN fibres which combines step by step crack propagation and final failure normal to the fibre axis. In the light of this observation, similar fracture behaviour has also been identified in PET fibres and which, until now had been overlooked. The loading criteria for fatigue failure are similar for both fibres and it has been shown that, for a given maximum cyclic load, lifetime is raised if the minimum cyclic load is increased.

Keywords

Fatigue Cyclic Load Fatigue Failure Failure Process Polyethylene Terephthalate 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    P. DAVIES, M. FRANçOIS and F. GROSJEAN, in “Proceedings of the 2002 OffshoreTechnology Conference” (Houston, Texas, 2002 14246).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    J. F. MANDELL, M. G. STECKEL, S.-S. CHUNG and M. C. KENNEY, Polym. Eng. Sci. 27 (1987) 1121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    A. S. HOCKENBERGER, S. KORAL and M. A. WILDING, Text. Res. J. 75 (2005).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    J. M. HERRERA-RAMIREZ, Ph.D. Thesis, Ecole Nationale Supérieure des Mines de Paris (2004).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    C. OUDET, A. R. BUNSELL, R. HAGEGE and M. SOTTON, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 29 (1984) 4363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    L. NASRI, A. LALLAM and A. R. BUNSELL, Text. Res. J. 71 (2001) 459.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    A. R. BUNSELL and J. W. S. HEARLE, J. Mater. Sci. 6 (1971) 1303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    J. M. HERRERA-RAMIREZ and A. R. BUNSELL, ibid. 40 (2005) 1269.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    A. R. BUNSELL and J. W. S. HEARLE, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 18 (1974) 267.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    P. L. CARR, H. ZANG and I. M. WARD, Polym. Adv. Technol. 7 (1996) 39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    G. WU, Q. LI and J. A. CUCULO, Polymer 41 (2000) 8139.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    A. SUZUKI, Y. NAKAMURA and T. KUNUGI, J. Polym. Sci. B. 37 (1999) 1703.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Idem., Polymer 40 (1999) 5043.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    C. J. M. VAN D. HEUVEL and E. A. KLOP, ibid. 41 (2000) 4249.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    A. SUZUKI, T. KUWABARA and T. KUNUGI, ibid. 39 (1998) 4235.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    G. WU and J. A. CUCULO, ibid. 40 (1999) 1011.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    A. R. BUNSELL, J. W. S. HEARLE and R. D. HUNTER, J. Phys. E 4 (1971) 868.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    D. C. PREVORSEK, P. J. HARGET and R. K. SHARMA, J. Macromol. Sci. B 8 (1973) 127.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    C. OUDET, Ph.D. Thesis, Ecole Nationale Supérieure des Mines de Paris (1986).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    A. MARCELLAN, Ph.D. Thesis, Ecole Nationale Supérieure des Mines de Paris (2003).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    A. MARCELLAN, A. BUNSELL, R. PIQUES and P. COLOMBAN, J. Mater. Sci. 38 (2003) 2117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    A. MARCELLAN, P. COLOMBAN and A. BUNSELL, J. Raman Spectrosc. 35 (2004) 308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    P. L. CARR, T. M. NICHOLSON and I. M. WARD, Polym. Adv. Technol. 8 (1997) 592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    R. JAKEWAYS, J. L. KLEIN and I. M. WARD, Polymer 37 (1996) 3761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    E. H. ANDREWS, in “Fracture in Polymers” (Oliver and Boyd, 1968) p. 133.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    S. SURESH, in “fatigue of materials,” 2nd edn (Cambridge University Press, 1998) p. 411.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. Lechat
    • 1
  • A. R. Bunsell
    • 1
  • P. Davies
    • 2
  • A. Piant
    • 1
  1. 1.Ecole Nationale Supérieure des Mines de ParisCentre des MatériauxEvry CedexFrance
  2. 2.Materials & Structures groupIFREMERPlouzanéFrance

Personalised recommendations