Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 42, Issue 8, pp 2802–2806 | Cite as

Compressive strength of ice at impact strain rates

  • Hyonny Kim
  • John N. Keune


The compressive strength of ice was measured at high strain rates of 103 s−1 order of magnitude. Since ice compressive strength is known to be strongly dependent on strain rate, properties corresponding to high strain rates are needed for engineering predictions of the behavior of ice under dynamic crushing scenarios. The split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB) apparatus was used to successfully measure compressive strength over a strain rate range of 400–2,600 s−1. Strain rate variation was achieved by adjusting the specimen length and the velocity of the SHPB striker bar; increased velocity and reduced specimen length produced higher strain rates. Since the compressive strength was found to be nearly uniform over the measured strain rate range, an average value of 19.7 MPa is reported. However, when comparing the present results with data in the existing literature spanning several orders of magnitude in strain rate, a trend of continuously increasing strength for strain rates beyond 101 s−1 can be observed.


Compressive Strength High Strain Rate Specimen Length Measure Strain Rate Dynamic Compressive Strength 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Kim H, Kedward KT (2000) AIAA J 38(7):1278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kim H, Kedward KT, Welch DA (2003) Compos Part A 34(1):25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mellor M (1979) In: Tryde P (ed) Physics and mechanics of ice. IUTAM Symposium, Copenhagen, pp 217–245Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Reich AD, Scavuzzo RJ, Chu ML (1994) Survey of mechanical properties of impact ice. Proceedings of 32nd aerospace sciences meeting and exhibit, AIAA 94–(0712) January 10–13, Reno, NVGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Petrovic JJ (2003) Review mechanical properties of ice and snow. J Mater Sci 38:1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hooke R LeB, Mellor M, Budd WF, Glen JW, Higashi A, Jacka TH, Jones SJ, Lile RC, Martin RT, Meier MF, Russel-Head DS, Weeterman J. (1980) Cold Regions Sci Technol 3:263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mellor M, Cole DM. (1982) Cold Regions Sci Technol 5(3):201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Shen, L-T, Zhao, S-D, Lu, X-N, Shi, Y-X (1988) In: Proceedings of the seventh international conference on offshore mechanics and arctic engineering, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York, pp 19–23Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kuehn GA, Schulson EM, Jones D E, Zhang J. (1993) J Offshore Mech Arctic Eng, Trans ASME 115(2):142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jones SJ. (1997) J Phys Chem B 101(32):6099CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Schulson EM. (1997) J Phys Chem B 101(32):6254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lindholm US. (1964) J Mech Phys Solids 12:317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Follansbee PS, Frantz C. (1983) J Eng Mater Technol 105:61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Schulson EM, (1990) Acta Metall Mater 38(10):1963CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Structural Engineering University of CaliforniaSan DiegoUSA
  2. 2.The Boeing CompanyEverettUSA

Personalised recommendations