Advertisement

Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 42, Issue 8, pp 2652–2661 | Cite as

Temperature and weldline effects on tensile properties of injection moulded short glass fibre PC/ABS polymer composite

  • S. Hashemi
  • Y. Lepessova
Article

Abstract

The effect of weldline and temperature on tensile properties of injection moulded PC/ABS blend reinforced with different concentration levels of short glass fibres was investigated between 23 and 100 °C. The weldline was formed in the moulded specimens by direct impingement of two opposing melt fronts. It was found that weldline had no significant effect on tensile modulus with weldline integrity factor in the range of 1–0.98. Tensile modulus for both weld and unweld specimens increased linearly with increasing volume fraction of fibres, ϕf, and decreased linearly with increasing temperature. Tensile strength of both weld and unweld tensile specimens increased non-linearly with increasing ϕf reaching a maximum at ϕf≈ 0.16 for specimens without weldline and ϕf≈ 0.12 for specimens with weldline. A linear dependence with respect to ϕf was found for both weld and unweld tensile strengths for fibre volume fractions in the range 0–0.1. It was found that below the glass transition temperature of the matrix, tensile strength of the composite with and without weldlines decreased linearly with increasing temperature. The weldline integrity factor for tensile strength decreased with increasing ϕf, but showed no significant variation with respect to temperature.

Keywords

Tensile Strength Fibre Length Fibre Volume Fraction Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene Fibre Concentration 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Kelly A, Tyson WR (1965) J Mech Phys Solids 6:13Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Piggott MR, Ko M, Chuang HY (1993) Compos Sci Technol 48:291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Piggott MR (1994) J Compos Mater 28:588Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hashemi S, Gilbride MT, Hodgkinson JM (1996) J Mater Sci 31:5017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Din KJ, Hashemi S (1997) J Mater Sci 32:375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chrysostomou A, Hashemi S (1998) J Mater Sci 33:1165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nabi ZU, Hashemi S (1998) J Mater Sci 33:2985CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chrysostomou A, Hashemi S (1998) J Mater Sci 33:4491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fu S-Y, Lauke B, Mader E, Yue C-Y, Hu X (2000) . Compos Part A 31:1117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hashemi S (2002) Plast, Rubber Compos 31:318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Thomason JL (2002) Compos Sci Technol 62:1455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Thomason JL (2001) Compos Sci Technol 61:2007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Thomason JL (2002) Compos Part A. 33:331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cox HL (1952) Br J Appl Phys 3:72Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Krenchel H (1964) Fiber reinforcement. Akad Forlag, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kitagawa M (1977) J Polym Sci 15:1601Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.London Metropolitan Polymer CentreLondon Metropolitan UniversityLondonUK

Personalised recommendations