Microstructural evolution during direct laser sintering in the Al2O3–SiO2 system
- 220 Downloads
- 3 Citations
Abstract
The microstructural evolution during direct laser sintering of LSD (Layerwise Slurry Deposition)—samples in the Al2O3–SiO2 system has been investigated. Slurries with a water content of 34 wt.% and a SiO2/Al2O3—ratio of about 3:1 have been used to manufacture layers which—after consecutive drying—have been sintered and laminated by laser treatment. Densified samples can be obtained with laser irradiances from 190 to 270 kW/cm2 and scan velocities between 35 and 65 mm/s. Elemental mappings of the layers’ cross sections suggest an inhomogeneous phase distribution in the laser sintered LSD samples with a slight alumina concentration gradient. A lower degree of particle melting in the bottom region of the layers is plausible due to attenuation of the laser beam intensity. SEM and HRTEM micrographs show that after a few seconds of laser treatment relictic starting phase, crystalline alumina plus amorphous silica, occur together with needle like mullite, the latter formed within an amorphous aluminosilicate phase. The resulting phase assemblage reflects the non-equilibrium conditions which can be expected for short time laser treatments. Mullite nucleation within the bulk of the liquid phase rather than in the vicinity of the parent alumina phase suggests that dissolution of alumina is the rate controlling step. Subsequent thermal post treatment in air in a conventional sintering furnace causes an increase of density to about 96% and leads to additional phase reactions. Amorphous silica transforms into cristobalite and the amount of alumina is reduced by additional mullite formation. By both coalescence of individual crystals and grain growth the morphology of the newly formed mullite changes during post heat treatment.
Keywords
Amorphous Silica Disperse Silica Laser Beam Intensity Mullite Formation Post Heat TreatmentReferences
- 1.Halloran JW, Griffith M, Chu T (2000) US patent application 6,117,612Google Scholar
- 2.Bertsch A, Jiguet S, Renaud P (2004) J Micromech Microeng 14:197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.Stierlen P (1999) German patent application DE 198 09 657 A1, in GermanGoogle Scholar
- 4.Subramanian PK (1995) Selective laser sintering of alumina. Ph.D. Thesis, The University of Texas at AustinGoogle Scholar
- 5.Knitter R, Bauer W, Göhring D (2003) J Mech Eng Sci 217:41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Lee I. (1998) J Mater Sci Lett 17:1907CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Löschau W, Lenk R, Scharek S, Teichgräber M, Nowotny S, Richter C (1999) In: Proc. 9th Cimtec World Ceramic Congress, p 567Google Scholar
- 8.Noeken S, Wagner C (2002) Maschinenmarkt 105:34, in GermanGoogle Scholar
- 9.Günster J, Engler S, Heinrich JG (2003) Eur Ceram Soc Bull 1:25Google Scholar
- 10.Gahler A, Günster J, Heinrich JG (2006) In: Proc. 1st Int. Congress on Ceramics, TorontoGoogle Scholar
- 11.Lawrence J, Li L (1999) J Phys D: Appl Phys 32:1075CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Das S (2003) Adv Eng Mater 5(10):701CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Gahler A, Günster J, Heinrich JG J Am Ceram Soc submitted for publicationGoogle Scholar
- 14.Günster J, Engler S, Heinrich JG (2003) Bull Eur Ceram Soc 1:25Google Scholar
- 15.Komarneni S, Schneider H, Okada K (2005) In: Schneider H, Komarneni S (eds) Mullite, Wiley, VCH, p 251Google Scholar
- 16.Meng J, Cai S, Yang Z, Yuan Q, Chen Y (1998) J Eur Ceram Soc 18:1107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Deer W, Howie RA, Zussman J (eds) (1997) Rock-forming minerals, vol. IA, 2nd edn. Geological Society Publishing House, Bath, UKGoogle Scholar
- 18.Schmücker M (2005) In: Schneider H, Komarneni S (eds) Mullite, Wiley VCH, p 93Google Scholar