Crack growth in structural adhesive joints in aqueous environments
- 227 Downloads
The adhesive fracture energy, Gc, of metallic joints, bonded with a rubber-toughened epoxy adhesive, has been measured using monotonically-loaded tests. Such tests have been conducted in various relative humidities and in water, at 21 °C. Two surface pretreatments have been employed for the substrates prior to bonding: a simple grit-blast and degrease (‘GBD’) pretreatment or a grit-blast, degrease and silane primer (‘GBS’) pretreatment. The joints were formed using metallic substrates which were either (a) aluminium-alloy substrates, (b) steel substrates, or (c) ‘dissimilar’ substrates (i.e. one substrate being aluminium-alloy with the other one being steel). For both test environments, when Gc was plotted against the crack velocity, three regions of fracture behaviour could be distinguished. At low rates of displacement the crack grew in a stable manner, visually along the interface, and relatively low crack velocities could be readily measured. This was termed ‘Region I’ and here the value of Gc measured in the aqueous environment was relatively low compared to that measured in a relatively dry environment of 55% relative humidity. On the other hand, at relatively high rates of displacement the crack always grew in a stick-slip manner mainly cohesively in the adhesive layer at approximately 20 km/min. This was termed ‘Region III’, and here the value of Gc was relatively high and independent of the environmental test conditions employed. In this region the crack was considered to grow faster than the water molecules were able to reach the crack tip, which explains the independence of Gc upon the test environment. In between ‘Region I’ and ‘Region III’, a transition region was observed which was designated as ‘Region II’. The major effect of the ‘GBS’ pretreatment, compared to the ‘GBD’ pretreatment, was to increase the value of Gc both in ‘Regions I and III’, although the presence of the silane primer had the far greater effect in ‘Region I’.
KeywordsAdhesive Layer Crack Velocity Dissimilar Joint Surface Pretreatment Unstable Crack Growth
The authors would like to thank Dr. D. Tod (QinetiQ) for financial support. They also wish to thank Mr. Steve Greaves of the University of Surrey for conducting the XPS studies and Professor Jim Castle for invaluable discussions regarding corrosion phenomena.
- 1.Kinloch AJ (ed) (1983) Durability of structural adhesives. Applied Science Publishers, LondonGoogle Scholar
- 3.Kinloch AJ (1997) Proc Inst Mech Eng 211(Part G):307Google Scholar
- 22.Yahalom J, Aladjem A (eds) (1980) Stress corrosion cracking. Freund, Tel AvivGoogle Scholar
- 24.Plueddeman EP (ed) (1982) Silane coupling agents. Plenum Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar