Weldment properties evaluation and formability study of tailor-welded blanks of different thickness combinations and welding orientations
- 431 Downloads
- 19 Citations
Abstract
Tailor-welded Blanks (TWBs) are tailor-made for different complex component designs by welding multiple metal sheets with different thicknesses, shapes or strengths prior to forming. However, the forming performance of an intrinsic TWB is critically related to its own structures and designs, such as the thickness combination, as well as the location and orientation of weldment. In this study, a 2 kW Nd:YAG laser were used to butt-weld approximately 180 samples of stainless steel (AISI 304) TWBs with different dimensions (i.e., from 12.7 mm to 165.1 mm in width), thickness combinations (i.e., 1.0/1.0 mm, 1.0/1.2 mm, 1.0/1.5 mm, 1.2/1.2 mm, 1.2/1.5 mm and 1.5/1.5 mm) and welding orientations (i.e., 0°, 45° and 90°). Subsequently, Swift forming tests were carried out to characterize the forming performance of those TWBs. Obviously, the optimal sets of welding parameters relating critically to the quality of weld was a primary criterion for the formability test of TWBs in this study. The effects of different thickness combinations on the formability of TWBs were investigated through the constructed forming limit diagrams (FLDs). The results showed that the thinner part of TWBs dominated the majority of deformation similar to the FLD of the parent metal. The effects of different welding orientations on the forming performance of TWBs were examined from the failure analysis.
Keywords
Welding Base Metal Welding Speed Welding Parameter Dome HeightNotes
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the Central Research Grant of the Hong Kong Polytechnic University for supporting this project (Project Code: R-GAP). Partial results of the paper were presented in the “LTWMP 2005 Conference” in May 2005 in Ukraine.
References
- 1.Pallet RJ, Lark RJ (2001) J Mater Process Technol 117:249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.Waddell W, Jacken S, Wallach ER (1998) SAE Technical Paper, Paper No 982396 Google Scholar
- 3.Ghoo BY, Keum YT, Kim YS (2001) J Mater Process Technol 113:692CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Abdullah K, Wild PM, Jeswiet JJ, Ghasempoor A (2001) J Mater Process Technol 112:91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Jian X (1998) In: Laser welding of sheet metals. PhD thesis, UMI Company, Ann Arbor, MichiganGoogle Scholar
- 6.Eisenmenger M, Bhatt KK (1995) Automotive Stamping Technol 27:171Google Scholar
- 7.Saunders FI, Wagoner RH (1996) Metall Mater Trans A-Phys Metall Mater Sci 27A:2605Google Scholar
- 8.Radlmayr KM, Sziyur J (1991) In: Proceedings of IDDRG Working Group MeetingGoogle Scholar
- 9.Heo Y, Choi Y, Kim HY, Seo D (2001) J Mater Process Technol 111:164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Chan SM, Chan LC, Lee TC (2003) J Mater Process Technol 132:95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.British Standard EN ISO 13919-2 (2001)Google Scholar
- 12.British Standard EN ISO 15614-11 (2002)Google Scholar
- 13.ASTM Standard E 8M (2001)Google Scholar
- 14.Tailor welded blank acceptance guidelines, Auto/Steel Partnership (1995)Google Scholar
- 15.Cheng CH, Chan LC, Chow CL, Lee TC (2005) In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference of Laser Technologies in Welding and Materials Processing. Crimea, p 171Google Scholar
- 16.Lippold JC, Kotecki DJ (2005) In: Welding metallurgy and weldability of stainless steels. John Wiley & Sons, New Jersey, p 153Google Scholar
- 17.Noble DN (1990) In: ASM Handbook volume 6 welding, brazing, and soldering. ASM International, Ohio, p 471Google Scholar
- 18.Duley WW (1999) In: Laser welding. John Wiley & Sons, Canada, p 26Google Scholar
- 19.Chow CL, Jie M, Hu SJ (2003) J Eng Mater Technol Trans ASME 125:260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Chan LC, Cheng CH, Jie M, Chow CL (2005) Int J Damage Mech 14:83CrossRefGoogle Scholar