Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 42, Issue 14, pp 5602–5612 | Cite as

Study of welding characteristics of 0.3C–CrMoV(ESR) ultrahigh strength steel

  • M. R. Suresh
  • P. P. Sinha
  • D. S. Sarma
  • N. B. Ballal
  • P. Krishna Rao
Article

Abstract

A new ultrahigh strength low alloy steel 0.3C–CrMoV(ESR), having an ultimate tensile strength and 0.2% proof strength of above 1,700 and 1,500 MPa, respectively, in quenched and tempered condition, was developed primarily as a cost effective material for space launch vehicle applications. Welding is a major step in the fabrication of most of the pressure vessels, structures and equipments. Steels with carbon equivalent in excess of 0.40 wt% show a tendency to form martensite on welding, and therefore are considered difficult to weld. 0.3C–CrMoV(ESR) steel has a carbon equivalent value of nearly 1.0 that classifies it as a ‘very difficult to weld’ steel. In addition it has a niobium content of about 0.10% and a vanadium content of 0.25%. It is known that niobium content of more than 0.02 wt% has a deleterious effect on the toughness properties of low carbon welds. It has also been reported that the effect of niobium on weld metal toughness is more deleterious in the presence of vanadium. Hence, in the present study, the properties of the weldment of this new steel under different heat treatment conditions (HT-1 and HT-2) have been studied. In HT-1 condition, the plates were welded in hardened and tempered condition and no further heat treatment was given after welding, while in HT-2 condition, the annealed plates were subjected to welding followed by hardening and tempering heat treatments. For HT-1 condition, only tensile properties were evaluated. The welded plates under HT-2 condition were evaluated for tensile properties, fracture toughness, residual strength and microstructure features.

References

  1. 1.
    Honeycomb R, Bhadeshia HKDH (1995) Steels: microstructure and properties, 2nd edn. Edward Arnold, London, p 171Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Levine E, Hill DC (1977) Met Trans A 8A:1453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Easterling KE (1983) Introduction to the physical metallurgy of welding. Butterworth Heinermann Ltd., Oxford, p 92Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chatterjee M, Balasubramanian MSN, Gupt KM, Krishna Rao P (1994) Ironmaking Steelmaking 21:399Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Report on Weldability Studies on AFNOR 15CDV6 steel and ESR Mod.15CDV6 steel, Welding Research Institute, Tiruchirapalli (1987)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sureshkumar R (1994) Welding characteristics of ESR Mod. 15CDV6 ultrahigh strength low alloy steel. M.Tech. Dissertation, I.I.T. MadrasGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Metals handbook, Desk Ed., ASM, Metals Park, Ohio (1992) 30.28Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Suresh MR, Suresh Kumar R, Sreekumar K, Sinha PP, Ballal NB, Krishna Rao P (2005) Mater Sci Tech 21(3):357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hall LR (1971) Fracture toughness testing at cryogenic temperatures, ASTM STP no. 496, 40Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Messler RW Jr (1999) Principles of welding: processes, physics, chemistry and metallurgy. John Wiley & Sons Inc., New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nagarajan KV (1998) Proc. workshop steels for engineering industries – trends in weldability, January 19–20, Tiruchirappalli, Nivey Comprints, WRI and IIM, 43Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Suresh MR, Samajdar I, Ingle A, Ballal NB, Rao PK, Sinha PP (2003) Ironmaking Steelmaking 30(5):379CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. R. Suresh
    • 1
  • P. P. Sinha
    • 1
  • D. S. Sarma
    • 2
  • N. B. Ballal
    • 3
  • P. Krishna Rao
    • 3
  1. 1.Vikram Sarabhai Space CentreIndian Space Research OrganisationTrivandrumIndia
  2. 2.Banaras Hindu UniversityVaranasiIndia
  3. 3.Indian Institute of Technology-BombayMumbaiIndia

Personalised recommendations