Reaction kinetics and mechanical properties in the reactive brazing of copper to aluminum nitride
- 317 Downloads
Aluminum nitride (AlN) is an attractive substrate material for electronic packaging applications because of its high thermal conductivity and electrical resistivity. However, improved metallization of aluminum nitride is required for reliable conductivity and good adhesion to the ceramic substrate. In this study, the kinetics, microstructure, and mechanical strength of Ag–Cu–Ti/AlN reaction couples have been studied in the temperature range of 900–1,050 °C and hold time range of 0–1.44 × 104 s using a eutectic silver–copper filler alloy containing titanium within the range of 2–8 wt%. The product layer thickening kinetics has been observed to change from a linear to non-linear thickening mechanism with the increase in holding time and temperature. At shorter hold times at a fixed temperature, the interfacial product layer followed a linear thickening kinetics. With the increase in the hold time, the thickening kinetics of the interface followed a non-linear thickening behavior. The non-linear thickening mechanism has been approximated as a parabolic thickening mechanism. The interface has been found to be rich in the reactive metal (Ti) content. The mechanical strength of the brazed joints has been analyzed using four-point bend tests. The strength of the brazed joints initially increased and then decreased with an increase in the hold time at a fixed temperature. A maximum strength of 196 MPa has been obtained for a brazed joint heated at 1,000 °C for 2,700 s containing 2 wt% Ti in the filler alloy. It was observed that the sample with the maximum strength had a discontinuous interface.
KeywordsHold Time Product Layer Aluminum Nitride Braze Alloy Beryllium Oxide
The authors thank the Center for Advanced Ceramic Technology and NYSCC at Alfred University for providing the financial support and St. Gobain Advanced Ceramics through Mr. Bob Fagan for supplying the AlN substrates. The help and assistance of Mr. Ward Votava at NYSCC for SEM study and Mr. Jim Thiebaud for mechanical testing assistance at NYSCC is greatly acknowledged.
- 1.Shaffer PTB, Mroz TJ (1991) In: ART handbook of advanced ceramic materials. Advanced Refractory Technology, NY, pp 60–84Google Scholar
- 2.Joyeux T, Jarrige J, Labbe JC, Lecompte JP, Mourier A (1999) Br Ceram Proc 60:321Google Scholar
- 3.Humpston G, Jacabson DM (1996) In: Principles of soldering and brazing, Ch 1–2. ASM International, Materials Park, OhioGoogle Scholar
- 5.Laider KL (1965) In: Chemical kinetics. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp 55–87Google Scholar
- 7.Colpetzer J, Meier AM (2001) CACT Seed Final Report, NYSCC at Alfred University, Alfred, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 8.Palit D, Meier AM (2003) MS Thesis, Alfred University, Alfred, NYGoogle Scholar
- 9.Loehman RE (1989) Am Ceram Soc Bull 68:891Google Scholar
- 13.Schwartz MM (1990) In: Ceramic joining. ASM International, Materials Park, Ohio, p 110Google Scholar
- 14.Viala JC (2002) In: Drew RAL, Pugh MD, and Brochu M (eds) Proceedings of the International Symposium on Metal/Ceramic Interactions, Montreal, August 2002. Metallurgical Society of Canadian Institute of Mining, Montreal, p 63Google Scholar