Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 41, Issue 18, pp 6142–6145 | Cite as

Interfacial fracture properties of environmentally friendly hybrid systems

  • G. Reyes-VillanuevaEmail author
  • S. Gupta

Hybrid systems consist of alternating layers of metal and fiber-reinforced polymer matrix composites. These systems also referred as composite metal laminates (CML) exhibit excellent resistance to fatigue and impact loading as well as superior specific stiffness and strength [1]. In addition, the residual strength of cracked CMLs has been shown to be greater than that of the plain metal counterpart as a result of crack bridging between the composite and metal constituents [2, 3, 4]. Traditionally, CMLs are based on thermosetting polymer matrices which normally exhibit a brittle deformation behavior and are associated with long manufacturing cycles. In contrast, thermoplastic-based CMLs offer significant advantages, including shorter processing times, high fracture toughness and the possibility of post-impact repair. However, one of the limiting factors for the development of these CMLs is the reduced availability of engineering knowledge related to their fracture mechanisms since...


Hybrid System Maleic Anhydride Interfacial Fracture Thermoplastic Composite Interfacial Fracture Energy 



The authors are grateful to the REEDF/CEEP programs of the CECS (UM-D) and the Rackham Faculty Grant (UM-AA) for supporting this work. The donation of Self-reinforced Curv (from Propex Fabrics Inc.), Twintex (from Saint Gobain) and XAF (from Collano Xiro) as well as the application of surface treatments by Sanchem Inc. is also gratefully acknowledged.


  1. 1.
    Vlot A, Vogelesang TJ de Vries (1998) Fiber metal laminates for high capacity aircraft. In: 30th international SAMPE technical conference. San Antonio, USA, 456 ppGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Young JB, Landry JGN, Cavoulacos VN (1994) Compos struct 27:457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ritchie RO, Yu W, Bucci RJ (1989) Eng Fract Mech 32:361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Vlot A (1996) Int J Impact Eng 18(3):291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chinsirikul W, Chung YC, Harrison IR (1992) Adhesion Improvement in polypropylene/aluminum Laminates. Proceedings of American society of composites, p 42Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Reyes G, Cantwell WJ (1998) Adv Compos Lett 7:97Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Reyes G, Cantwell WJ (2000) Compos Sci Technol 60:1085CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Reyes G, Cantwell WJ (2000) Energy absorption in hybrid composite structures, Materials and structures for energy absorption, London, UK, p 33Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Reyes G, Cantwell WJ, Cruz MJ, Velaso AFA (2003) The impact properties of novel thermoplastic based fiber-metal laminates. In: Proceedings of the VI International Conference on Composites and Materials, Morelia, Mich., Mexico, p 155Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Davies P, Cantwell WJ (1994) Composites 25:869CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Lightweighting Automotive Materials and ProcessingUniversity of Michigan-DearbornDearbornUSA
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of Michigan-Dearborn DearbornUSA
  3. 3.Department of Automotive Systems EngineeringUniversity of Michigan-DearbornDearbornUSA

Personalised recommendations