Meso-macro approach for composites forming simulation
Abstract
The F.E. analysis of woven composite reinforcement forming is an alternative to geometrical draping computation. It permits to account for mechanical behaviours of the fabric and static boundary conditions of the process. In this paper, macroscopic forming simulations of woven composite reinforcements are performed using finite elements composed of woven cells, the mechanical behaviour of which are computed by F.E. analyses at mesoscale i.e. on the unit cell of the fabric. The objective is to only calculate the relevant quantities in the woven finite element. The in-plane biaxiale tensile behaviour and the in-plane shear behaviour are obtained by 3D analyses of the woven cell submitted respectively to tension and shear. They need to take the specificities of the mechanical behaviour of the yarn (made of thousand of fibres) into account. Especially an objective derivative based on the fibre rotation is used. These computations on the unit woven cell have proved to be consistent with experimental tests. An example of deep drawing of a square box using the proposed approach is presented. Angles between warp and weft directions are computed as well as wrinkles.
Keywords
Shear Angle Biaxial Tension Weft Yarn Weft Direction Spurious ModeNotes
Acknowledgements
The author acknowledge the support provided by the EADS aeronautical company and the researchers of his former laboratory: the LMSP Paris-Orléans.
References
- 1.Bickerton S, Simacek P, Guglielmi SE, Advani SG (1997) Comp Part A 28:801CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.Parnas RS (2000) Liquid composite molding. Hanser Garner publicationsGoogle Scholar
- 3.Van Der Ween F (1991) Intl J Numer Method Eng 31:1414Google Scholar
- 4.Long AC, Rudd CD (1994) I Mech E J Eng Manuf 208:269Google Scholar
- 5.Borouchaki H, Cherouat A (2002) Revue des composites et matériaux avancés, 12/3:407Google Scholar
- 6.Boisse P, Daniel JL, Hivet G, Soulat D (2001) Intl J Form Proc 3(3-4):351Google Scholar
- 7.Boisse Ph, Cherouat A, Gelin JC, Sabhi H (1995) Polymer Comp 16(1):83Google Scholar
- 8.De Luca P, Lefebure P, Pickett AK (1998) Comp Part A 29:101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Hsiao S-W, Kikuchi N (1999) Comp Met Appl Mech Eng 177:1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.King MJ, Socrate S, Jearanaisilawong P (2005) Intl J Solids Struct 42:3867CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Durville D (2002) Finite Element Euro Revue 11(2-3-4):463Google Scholar
- 12.Kawabata S, Niwa M, Kawai H (1973) J Textile Inst 64:21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Hivet G (2002) Modélisation mesoscopique du comportement biaxial et de la mise en forme des renforts de composites tissés, Ph.D. Thesis, University of OrléansGoogle Scholar
- 14.Lomov SV, Truong Chi T, Verpoest I, Peeters T, Roose D, Boisse P, Gasser A (2003) Intl J Form Proc 6(3-4):413Google Scholar
- 15.Sagar TV, Potluri P, Hearle JWS (2003) Comp Mater Sci 28:49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Ben Boubaker B, Haussy B, Ganghoffer JF (2002) CRAS Paris Mech Ser 330:871Google Scholar
- 17.Ben Boubaker B, Haussy B, Ganghoffer JF (2005) Euro J Comp Mech 14(6--7):653Google Scholar
- 18.Spencer AJM (2000) Comp Part A 31:1311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Xue P, Peng X, Cao J (2003) Comp Part A 34:183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Yu X, Ye L, Mai Y-W (2004) Proceedings of the Int. Conf ESAFORM 7, Trondheim, pp 325–328Google Scholar
- 21.Zouari B, Daniel JL, Boisse P (2005) Comp Struct 84:351Google Scholar
- 22.Buet-Gautier K, Boisse P (2001) Exp Mech 41:260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.Dumont F (2003) Contribution à l’expérimentation et à la modélisation du comportement mécanique de renforts de composites tissés’, Ph.D. Thesis, Université Paris 6Google Scholar
- 24.Lomov SV, Stoilova T, Verpoest I (2004) In: Proceedings of the Int. Conf ESAFORM 7, TrondheimGoogle Scholar
- 25.Gasser A, Boisse P, Hanklar S (2000) Comput Mater Sci 17:7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 26.Boisse P, Gasser A, Hivet G (2001) Comp Part A 32:1395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 27.Schnur DS, Zabaras N (1992) Intl J Numer Met Eng 33:2039CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 28.Gutowski TG (1985) SAMPE Quart 16(4):58Google Scholar
- 29.Baoxing C, Chou TW (1999) Composite Sci Tech 59:1519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 30.Hughes TJR (1987) The finite element method, Linear Static and Dynamic finite element Analysis. Prentice HallGoogle Scholar
- 31.Flanagan DP, Belytschko T (1981) Intl J Numer Met Eng 17:679CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 32.Pian TH, Chen DO (1983) Intl J Numer Met Eng 19:1741CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 33.Gilormini P, Roudier P, Abaqus and finite strain (1993) Internal report, LMT Cachan 140Google Scholar
- 34.Dafalias YF (1983) Trans ASME J Ap Mech 50:561Google Scholar
- 35.Gilormini P, Roudier P, Rougee P (1993) Comptes-rendus à l’Académie des Sciences de Paris 316(II):1659Google Scholar
- 36.Dienes JK (1979) Acta Mech 32:217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 37.Crisfield MA (1991) Non linear finite element analysis of solids and structures, vol. II: Advanced topics. John Wiley & Sons, EnglandGoogle Scholar
- 38.Hagege B (2004) Simulation du comportement mecanique des renforts fibreux en grandes transformations : application aux renforts tricotes, Ph.D. Thesis, ENSAM ParisGoogle Scholar
- 39.Hagège B, Boisse P, Billoët J-L (2005) Euro J Comp Mech 14(6--7):767Google Scholar
- 40.Mcbride TM, Chen J (1997) Comp Sci Technol 57:345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 41.Mcguinness GB, O’Bradaigh CMO (1998) Comp Part A 29(1–2):115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 42.Numisheet ’93 (1993) In: Makinouchi A, Nakamachi E, Onate E, Wagoner, RH (eds) Numerical simulation of 3-D sheet metal forming processes—Verification of simulation with experiments, JapanGoogle Scholar