Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 42, Issue 8, pp 2796–2801 | Cite as

Influence of coating on short steel fiber reinforcements on corrosion behavior of aluminium base short steel fiber reinforced composites

  • D. Mandal
  • B. K. Dutta
  • S. C. Panigrahi


Steel fiber reinforced aluminium composites are attractive materials of high specific strength but exhibit poor resistance against electrochemical corrosion. The study discusses the electrochemical corrosion behavior of uncoated, copper and nickel coated short steel fiber reinforced aluminium and Al–2Mg matrix composites in 1 (N) NaCl solution. Galvanic corrosion between the steel fiber and aluminium governs the corrosion behavior of these composites. It has been observed that open circuit potential (OCP) is shifted to more negative side with copper coating on the fibers and to the more positive side on coating the fibers with nickel. Compared to the uncoated fiber higher corrosion current density indicates corrosion rate was observed for the copper coated fiber reinforced composites where as a lower current density was noted for the nickel coated fiber reinforced composites was observed. Addition of 2 wt% magnesium to aluminium alloy matrix increased the corrosion current density. The corrosion mechanism in these composites is dominated by galvanic cell formation that is evident from the dissolution of Al matrix near the peripheral region of steel fibers.


Corrosion Rate Steel Fiber Corrosion Current Density Nickel Coating Galvanic Corrosion 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Rohatgi P (1998) Cast metal matrix composites. ASM Hand Book, ASM International, vol 15, p 840Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Suresh S, Mortensen A (1997) Int Mat Rev 42(3):85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Llyod DJ (1994) Int Mater Rev 39(1):1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Maity PC, Chakraborty PN, Panigrahi SC (1996) J Mater Sci 31:6377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wielage B, Dorner A (1999) Comp Sci Technol 59(8):1239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dorner A, Wielage B, Shurer C (1999) Thin Solid films 355–356:214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Trzaskoma PP (1990) Corrosion 46(5):402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Geiger AL, Hasselman DPH, Donadson KYJ (1993) J Mater Sci Lett 12:420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hihara LH, Latanision RM (1992) Corrosion 48(7):546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hihara LH, Latanision RM (1994) Int Mater Rev 39(6):245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wielage B, Dorner A, Shurer C, Kim JH (2000) Mater Sci Tech 16:344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Geiger AL, Walker JA (1991) J Mater Sci, 43:8Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mandal D, Dutta BK, Panigrahi SC (2004) Wear 257(7–8):654CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fridlyander IN, Bubenschikov AS (1995) In: Fridlyander (IN) Metal matrix composites. Chapman & Hall, Chapter-7, p 397Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Metal Extraction and Forming DivisionNational Metallurgical LaboratoryJamshedpurIndia
  2. 2.Metallurgical and Materials Engineering DepartmentIndian Institute of TechnologyKharagpurIndia

Personalised recommendations