Advertisement

Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 42, Issue 19, pp 8326–8333 | Cite as

Effect of organoclay addition on the two-body abrasive wear characteristics of polyamide 6 nanocomposites

  • G. Srinath
  • R. GnanamoorthyEmail author
Article

Abstract

Polymer clay nanocomposites (PCN) exhibit improved mechanical properties due to nanolevel dispersion of clay in the polymer matrix. They also exhibit good tribological performance under dry sliding conditions. Abrasive wear behaviour of these materials would be different from dry sliding behaviour as the mechanisms of the both are entirely different. Hence the abrasive wear behaviour of these materials needs to be investigated. The abrasive wear characteristics of polyamide 6 nanocomposites, with 1, 3 and 5% (wt.) clay prepared by melt intercalation technique, under two-body abrasive wear conditions have been reported. Abrasive wear tests were conducted using a pin-on-disc tribometer containing an abrasive counterface. All the polyamide nanocomposites investigated exhibited a low abrasive wear resistance compared with pristine Nylon. The wear performance of the nanocomposites was correlated with the mechanical properties. Dominant ploughing and cutting wear were observed in polymer clay nanocomposites. The amount of clay present alters the wear mechanism.

Keywords

Wear Rate Abrasive Wear Wear Debris Ultrahigh Molecular Weight Polyethylene Wear Loss 

References

  1. 1.
    Lebaron PC, Wang Z, Pinnavaia TJ (1999) Appl Clay Sci 15:11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Alexandre M, Dubois P (2000) Mater Sci Eng 28:1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dahman SJ (2001) In: White paper on nylon 6 nanocomposites. RTP Company, Winona, p 1Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Shi G, Zhang MQ, Rong MZ, Wetzel B, Friedrich K (2003) Wear 254:784CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wang QH, Xu J, Shen W, Xue Q (1997) Wear 209:316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Li F, Hu K-A, Li J-L, Zhao B-Y (2001) Wear 249:877CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Srinath G, Gnanmoorthy R (2005) J Mater Sci 40:2897CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bijwe J, Indumathi J, Rajesh JJ, Fahim M (2001) Wear 249:715CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bijwe J, Rajesh JJ, Jeyakumar A, Gosh A, Tewari US (2000) Tribol Int 33:697CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Liu C, Ren L, Arnell RD, Tong J (1999) Wear 225–229:199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bentone 105-Technical Information (2003) Elementis Specialties Inc., HighstownGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    ASTM D 638 (2002) Standard test method for tensile properties of plastics, vol 8.01. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, p 45Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Yasue K, Katahira S, Yoshikawa M, Fuijimoto K (2001) In: Pinnavaia TJ, Beall GW (eds) Polymer-clay nanocomposites. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, p 111Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jeffery J, Jacob KI, Tannaenbaum R, Sharaf MA, Jasiuk I (2005) Mater Sci Eng A 393:1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rajesh JJ, Bijwe J, Tewari US (2002) Wear 252:769CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bundisnki KG (1997) Wear 203–204:302Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lancaster JK (1969) Wear 14:223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Shipway PH, Ngao NK (2003) Wear 255:742CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    BriscoeB, (1981) Tribol Int 14:231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sinha SK (2002) In: Becker WT, Shipley RJ (eds) ASM handbook vol 11 failure analysis and prevention. ASM International, Ohio, p 1020Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Rabinowicz E (1995) In: Friction and wear of materials. John Wiley & Sons, New York, p 194Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bayer RG (1994) In: Mechanical wear prediction and prevention. Marcel Dekker Inc., New York, pp 23Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Stachowaik GW, Batchelor AW (2000) In: Engineering tribology Butterworth-Heinemann, Boston, p 483Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringIndian Institute of Technology MadrasChennaiIndia

Personalised recommendations