Advertisement

Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 42, Issue 3, pp 948–957 | Cite as

The impact properties and damage tolerance and of bi-directionally reinforced fiber metal laminates

  • Guocai WuEmail author
  • Jenn-Ming Yang
  • H. Thomas Hahn
Article

Abstract

Fiber metal laminates are an advanced hybrid materials system being evaluated as a damage tolerance and light weight solution for future aircraft primary structures. This paper investigates the impact properties and damage tolerance of glass fiber reinforced aluminum laminates with cross-ply glass prepreg layers. A systematic low velocity impact testing program based on instrumented drop weight was conducted, and the characteristic impact energies, the damage area, and the permanent deflection of laminates are used to evaluate the impact performance and damage resistance. The post-impact residual tensile strength under various damage states ranging from the plastic dent, barely visible impact damage (BVID), clearly visible impact damage (CVID) up to the complete perforation was also measured and compared. Additionally, the post-impact fatigue behavior with different damage states was also explored. The results showed that both GLARE 4 and GLARE 5 laminates have better impact properties than those of 2024-T3 monolithic aluminum alloy. GLARE laminates had a longer service life than aluminum under fatigue loading after impact, and they did not show a sudden and catastrophic failure after the fatigue crack was initiated. The damage initiation, damage progression and failure modes under impact and fatigue loading were characterized and identified with microscopy, X-ray radiography, and by deply technique.

Keywords

Fatigue Crack Fatigue Crack Growth Impact Energy Residual Strength Impact Damage 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) through the Center of Excellence on Composites and Advanced Materials. Curt Davies is the program manager. The authors thank Mr Hyoungseock Seo for his participation in post-impact fatigue testing.

References

  1. 1.
    Vogeslang LB, Vlot A (2000) J Mater Process Technol 103:1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Vermeeren CAJR (2003) Appl Comp Mater 10:189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Vlot A, Vogelesang LB, de Vries TJ (1999) Aircr Eng Aerosp Technol 71:558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Afaghi-khatibi A, Ye L, Mai YW (2000) In: Comprehensive composite materials, vol 2, pp 249–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wu G, Yang J-M (2005) JOM 57(1):72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Vlot A, Kroon E, La Rocca G (1998) Key Eng Mater 141–143:235Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Vlot A (1996) Int J Impact Eng 18:291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Compston P, Cantwell WJ, Jones C, Jones N (2001) J Mater Sci Lett 20:597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Laliberte JF, Poon C, Straznicky PV, Fahr A (2002) Int J Fatigue 24:249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sun CT, Dicken A, Wu HF (1993) Comp Sci Technol 49:139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lawcock GD, Ye L, Mai YW, Sun CT (1997) Comp Sci Technol 57:1621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hwang B (1994) Damage initiation during low-velocity impact on composite laminates. PhD Dissertation, University of DaytonGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Carlile DR, Leach DC (1983) In: Proceedings of 15th National SAMPE Technical Conf., Oct. 4–6, 1983, pp 82–93Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sykes GF, Stoakley DM (1980) In: Proceedings of the 12th National SAMPE Technical Conf., Oct. 7–9, 1980, pp 482–493Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Choi HY, Wu H-YT, Chang FK (1991) J Comp Mater 25:992CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Liu D, Malvern LE (1987) J Comp Mater 21:594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Joshi SP, Sun CT (1985) J Comp Mater 19:51CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Materials Science and EngineeringUniversity of CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA
  2. 2.Cummins Inc.ColumbusUSA
  3. 3.Department of Mechanical and Aerospace EngineeringUniversity of CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations