Advertisement

Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 40, Issue 2, pp 315–321 | Cite as

The effect of temperature on the extrusion behavior of a polymer/ceramic refractory paste

  • L. J. Wells
  • S. A. Nightingale
  • G. M. Spinks
Article

Abstract

The effect of temperature on the extrusion behavior of a polymer/ceramic refractory paste, known as taphole clay, has been investigated. Experiments were performed to determine the extrusion pressure and the viscosity of the paste’s phenolic resin binder between 30 and 60°C. The extrusion parameters were determined using the Benbow and Bridgwater method [1]. As the temperature was increased, a decrease in the extrusion pressure was observed. Three of the four Benbow and Bridgwater extrusion parameters were found to be dependent on temperature and the binder’s viscosity. From this data a model was produced using a modified Benbow and Bridgwater equation that predicts the effect of temperature on the extrusion pressure of the paste.

Keywords

Polymer Viscosity Clay Phenolic Resin Extrusion Pressure 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    J. BENBOW and J. BRIDGWATER, “Paste Flow and Extrusion” (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1993).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Y. CHEN, A. BURBIDGE and J. BRIDGEWATER, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 80 (1997) 1841.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    J. S. REED, in “Principles of Ceramic Processing,” 2nd ed. (John Wiley and Sons Inc., New York, 1995).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    C. RAUWENDAAL, “Polymer Extrusion,” 3rd ed. (Hanser Publishers, Munich, 1994).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    A. H. ANDERSON and J. M. NEWTON, in “Rheology of Food, Pharmaceutical and Biological Materials” (Elsevier Science Publishers, London, 1990) p. 258.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    D. B. PRICE and J. S. REED, Amer. Ceram. Soc. Bull. 62 (1983) 1348.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    J. J. BENBOW, S. BLACKBURN and H. MILLS, J. Mater. Sci. 33 (1998) 5827.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    O. DRAPER, S. BLACKBURN, G. DOLMAN, K. SMALLEY and A. GRIFFITHS, J. Mater. Proc. Tech. 93 (1999) 141.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    J. ZHENG and W. B. CARLSON, J. Amer. Ceram. Soc. 75 (1992) 3011.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    N. P. BROWN, “Surrey Handling Design of Solid—Liquid Systems” (Elsevier Science Publishers Ltd., London, 1991) p. 17.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    A. D. U. S. AMARASINGHE and D. I. WILSON, Trans. IChemE 76 (1998) 3.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    H. BÖHM and S. BLACKBURN, Brit. Ceram. Trans. 93 (1994) 169.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    S. GLASSTONE, in “Textbook of Physical Chemistry,” 2nd ed. (Macmillan, Princeton, 1946).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    S. L. ROUGH, D. I. WILSON and J. BRIDGWATER, Trans IChemE 80 (2002) 701.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • L. J. Wells
    • 1
  • S. A. Nightingale
    • 1
  • G. M. Spinks
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute for Steel Processing and Products, Faculty of EngineeringUniversity of WollongongAustralia

Personalised recommendations