Self-Organized Task Allocation for Service Tasks in Computing Systems with Reconfigurable Components
- 41 Downloads
A self-organized scheme for the allocation service tasks in adaptive or organic computing systems is proposed. Such computing systems are highly self-organized and the components ideally adapt to the needs of users or the environment. Typically, the components of such systems need some service from time to time in order perform their work efficiently. Since the type of service tasks will often change in this systems it is attractive to use reconfigurable hardware to perform the service tasks. The studied system consists of normal worker components and the helper components which have reconfigurable hardware and can perform different service tasks. The speed with which a service task is executed by a helper depends on its actual configuration. Different strategies for the helpers to decide about service task acceptance and reconfiguration are proposed. These task acceptance strategies are inspired by stimulus-threshold models that are used to explain task allocation in social insects. Analytical results for a system with two reconfigurable helpers are presented together with simulation results for larger systems.
KeywordsOrganic computing Self organization Reconfigurable hardware Task allocation
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Agassounon, W., Martinoli, A.: Efficiency and robustness of threshold-based distributed allocation algorithms in multi-agent systems. In: Proc. of the First Int. Joint Conf. on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems AAMAS-02, pp. 1090–1097. ACM Press (2002)Google Scholar
- 3.Bonabeau, E., Sobkowski, A., Theraulaz, G., Deneubourg, J.-L.: Adaptive task allocation inspired by a model of division of labor in social insects. In: Lundh, D. et al. (eds.) Biocomputing and Emergent Computation, pp. 36–45. World Scientific (1997)Google Scholar
- 6.Cicirello, V.A., Smith, S.F.: Distributed coordination of resources via wasp-like agents. Proc. First NASA GSFC/JPL Workshop on Radical Agent Concepts (WRAC), pp. 71–80 (2003)Google Scholar
- 7.Cicirello, V.A., Smith, S.F.: Wasp nests for self-configurable factories. Proc. Fifth Int. Conf. on Autonomous Agents, pp. 473–480 (2001)Google Scholar
- 8.Cicirello, V.A., Smith, S.F.: Insect Societies and Manufacturing IJCAI-01 Workshop on Artificial Intelligence and Manufacturing (2001)Google Scholar
- 9.Ferreira, P.R., de Oliveira, D., Bazzan, A.L.C.: A swarmbased approach to adapt the structural dimension of agents’ organization. J. Braz. Comput. Soc. 11(1), 63–73 (2005)Google Scholar
- 11.GI: Organic Computing / VDE, ITG, GI—Positionspapier. 2003, online: http://www.betriebssysteme.org/Betriebssysteme/FutureTrends/oc-positionspapier.pdf
- 12.Kephart, J.O., Chess, D.M.: The vision of autonomic computing. IEEE Comput. 36(1), 41–50 (2003)Google Scholar
- 13.Kittithreerapronchai, O., Anderson, C.: Do ants paint trucks better than chickens? Market versus response thresholds for distributed dynamic scheduling. Proc. IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (2003)Google Scholar
- 17.Schmeck, H.: Organic computing—a new vision for distributed embedded systems. Proc. of the Eighth IEEE International Symposium on Object-Oriented Real-Time Distributed Computing (ISORC 2005), pp. 201–203 (2005)Google Scholar
- 18.Price, R., Tino, P.: Evaluation of adaptive nature inspired task allocation against alternate decentralised multiagent strategies. Proc. Parallel Problem Solving from Nature—PPSN VIII, pp. 982–990. LNCS 3242, Springer (2004)Google Scholar