Advertisement

Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision

, Volume 61, Issue 7, pp 919–943 | Cite as

The Highlight Ovals

  • Adrien BartoliEmail author
Article
  • 248 Downloads

Abstract

We propose a model of plane ovals based on two foci defined in the 3D space. Geometrically, some of these ovals are the isocontours of a planar specular highlight for a point light source according to Phong’s reflectance model. We, hence, call them the highlight ovals. More precisely, we define a geometric highlight oval as the locus of points p whose product of distances to the foci is proportional to the dot product of the vectors from p to the foci. When the proportionality is taken up to sign, this gives a quartic, whose roots define the algebraic highlight oval. Similarly to the Cartesian oval, the algebraic formulation hence includes a pair of geometric highlight ovals. Similarly to the Cassinian oval, the geometric definition includes non-convex closed curves. The highlight ovals have four intrinsic parameters, namely the height of the two foci relative to the oval’s plane, the distance between the two foci’s projection on the oval’s plane and a scale factor fixing the proportionality and related to the isocontour’s intensity. We thoroughly study the topology and convexity of the family of algebraic highlight ovals for any combination of its four intrinsic parameters and show how this characterizes the geometric highlight ovals, and thus the isocontours of specular highlights. We report an extensive experimental evaluation, showing that the highlight ovals form a reliable model of specular highlights.

Keywords

Reflectance Algebraic curves Phong 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research has received funding from the EU’s FP7 through the ERC research Grant 307483 FLEXABLE. We thank François Chadebecq for his kind help in taking the images for the experiments.

Supplementary material

References

  1. 1.
    Basset, A.B.: An Elementary Treatise on Cubic and Quartic Curves. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1901)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Blake, A., Bülthoff, H.: Does the brain know the physics of specular reflection? Nature 343(6254), 165–168 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Boyd, S., Vandenberghe, L.: Convex Optimization. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2004)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Breuss, M., Ju, Y.C.: Shape from shading with specular highlights: analysis of the Phong model. In: International Conference on Image Processing (2011)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dixon, R.A.: Mathographics. Dover Publications, Inc, Mineola (1987)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fitzgibbon, A., Pilu, M., Fisher, R.: Direct least square fitting of ellipses. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 21(5), 476–480 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Forsyth, D., Ponce, J.: Computer Vision—A Modern Approach, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River (2003)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hadj Said, S., Tamaazousti, M., Bartoli, A.: Image-based models for specularity propagation in diminished reality. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 24(7), 2140–2152 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Helton, J.W., Vinnikov, V.: Linear matrix inequality representation of sets. Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 60(5), 654–674 (2007)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Herling, J., Broll, W.: High-quality real-time video inpainting with pixmix. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 20(6), 866–879 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hughes, J.E., van Dam, A., McGuire, M., Sklar, D.F., Foley, J.D., Feiner, S.K., Akeley, K.: Computer Graphics: Principles and Practice, 3rd edn. Addison-Wesley, Boston (2014)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kawai, N., Sato, T., Yokoya, N.: Diminished reality based on image inpainting considering background geometry. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 22(3), 1236–1247 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lawrence, J.D.: A Catalog of Special Plane Curves. Dover Books on Advanced Mathematics. Dover Publications, Mineola (1972)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Milne, J.S.: Elliptic Curves. BookSurge Publishers, North Charleston (2006)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Nayar, S.K., Ikeuchi, K., Kanade, T.: Shape from interreflections. Int. J. Comput. Vis. 6(3), 173–195 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Phong, B.T.: Illumination for computer generated pictures. Commun. ACM 18(6), 311–317 (1975)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Semple, J.G., Kneebone, G.T.: Algebraic Projective Geometry. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1963)zbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Université Clermont AuvergneClermont-Ferrand CedexFrance

Personalised recommendations