Extended Shearlet HMT Model-Based Image Denoising Using BKF Distribution
- 305 Downloads
Images are often corrupted by noise in the procedures of image acquisition and transmission. It is a challenging work to design an edge-preserving image denoising scheme. Extended discrete Shearlet transform (extended DST) is an effective multi-scale and multi-direction analysis method; it not only can exactly compute the Shearlet coefficients based on a multiresolution analysis, but also can represent images with very few coefficients. In this paper, we propose a new image denoising approach in extended DST domain, which combines hidden Markov tree (HMT) model and Bessel K Form (BKF) distribution. Firstly, the marginal statistics of extended DST coefficients are studied, and their distribution is analytically calculated by modeling extended DST coefficients with BKF probability density function. Then, an extended Shearlet HMT model is established for capturing the intra-scale, inter-scale, and cross-orientation coefficients dependencies. Finally, an image denoising approach based on the extended Shearlet HMT model is presented. Extensive experimental results demonstrate that our extended Shearlet HMT denoising approach can obtain better performances in terms of both subjective and objective evaluations than other state-of-the-art HMT denoising techniques. Especially, the proposed approach can preserve edges very well while removing noise.
KeywordsImage denoising Hidden Markov tree (HMT) Extended discrete Shearlet transform (extended DST) Bessel K Form (BKF) distribution
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant Nos. 61472171 & 61272416, and Liaoning Research Project for Institutions of Higher Education of China under Grant No. L2013407.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- 1.Lee, S., Cho, S.: Recent advances in image deblurring. In: Proceedings ofSIGGRAPH Asia 2013 Courses, New York, vol. 6, pp. 1–108 (2013)Google Scholar
- 3.Buades, A., Coll, B., Morel, J.M.: A nonlocal algorithm for image denoising. In: IEEE Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 2005, San Diego, vol. 2, pp. 60–65 (2005)Google Scholar
- 9.Tomasi, C., Manduchi, R.: Bilateral filtering for gray and color Images. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision(ICCV), Bombay, pp. 839–846 (1998)Google Scholar
- 17.Azzari, L., Foi, A.: Gaussian-Cauchy mixture modeling for robust signal-dependent noise estimation. In: 2014 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), Florence, pp. 5357–5361 (2014)Google Scholar
- 22.Goossens, B., Aelterman, J., Luong, Q.: Complex wavelet joint denoising and demosaicing using Gaussian scale mixtures. In: IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP 2013), Melbourne, pp. 445–448 (2013)Google Scholar
- 26.Zhang, W., Wang, S., Liu, F.: Image denoising using Bandelets and hidden Markov tree models. Chin. J. Electron. 19(4), 646–650 (2010)Google Scholar
- 27.Choi, H., Romberg, J., Baraniuk, R., Kingsbury, N.: Hidden Markov tree modeling of complex wavelet transforms. In: Proceedings of 2000 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP), vol. 1, pp. 133–136 (2000)Google Scholar
- 31.Amini, M., Ahmad, M.O., Swamy, M.N.S.: Image denoising in wavelet domain using the vector-based hidden Markov model. In: The 12th International New Circuits and Systems Conference (NEWCAS), Trois-Rivieres, pp. 29–32 (2014)Google Scholar
- 35.Bian, Y., Liang, S.: Locally optimal detection of image watermarks in the wavelet domain using Bessel K form distribution. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 22(6), 2372–2384 (2013)Google Scholar