Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision

, Volume 30, Issue 1, pp 23–41 | Cite as

PHLST5: A Practical and Improved Version of Polyharmonic Local Sine Transform

Article

Abstract

We introduce a practical and improved version of the Polyharmonic Local Sine Transform (PHLST) called PHLST5. After partitioning an input image into a set of rectangular blocks, the original PHLST decomposes each block into a polyharmonic component and a residual. Each polyharmonic component solves a polyharmonic equation with the boundary conditions that match the values and normal derivatives of even orders along the boundary of the corresponding block with those of the original image block. Thanks to these boundary conditions, the residual component can be expanded into a Fourier sine series without facing the Gibbs phenomenon, and its Fourier sine coefficients decay faster than those of the original block. Due to the difficulty of estimating normal derivatives of higher orders, however, only the harmonic case (i.e., Laplace’s equation) has been implemented to date, which was called Local Laplace Sine Transform (LLST). In that case, the Fourier sine coefficients of the residual decay in the order O(‖k−3), where k is the frequency index vector. Unlike the original PHLST, PHLST5 only imposes the boundary values and the first order normal derivatives as the boundary conditions, which can be estimated using the information of neighbouring image blocks. In this paper, we derive a fast algorithm to compute a 5th degree polyharmonic function that satisfies such boundary conditions. Although the Fourier sine coefficients of the residual of PHLST5 possess the same decaying rate as in LLST, by using additional information of first order normal derivative from the boundary, the blocking artifacts are largely suppressed in PHLST5 and the residual component becomes much smaller than that of LLST. Therefore PHLST5 provides a better approximation result. We shall also show numerical experiments that demonstrate the superiority of PHLST5 over the original LLST in terms of the efficiency of approximation.

Keywords

Local Fourier analysis Polyharmonic equation Discrete sine transform Image approximation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Averbuch, A., Israeli, M., Vozovoi, L.: A fast Poisson solver of arbitrary order accuracy in rectangular regions. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 19(3), 933–952 (1998) MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bialeck, B., Karageorghis, A.: A Legendre spectral Galerkin method for the biharmonic Dirichlet problem. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 22(5), 1549–1569 (2000) CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bjørstad, P.: Fast numerical solution of the biharmonic Dirichlet problem on rectangles. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 20(1), 59–71 (1983) MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Braverman, E., Israeli, M., Averbuch, A., Vozovoi, L.: A fast 3D Poisson solver of arbitrary order accuracy. J. Comput. Phys. 144, 109–136 (1998) CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Briggs, W.L., Henson, V.E.: The DFT: An Owner’s Manual for the Discrete Fourier Transform. SIAM, Philadelphia (1995) MATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Buhmann, M.D.: Radial basis functions. Acta Numer. 9, 1–38 (2000) CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Coifman, R.R., Meyer, Y.: Remarques sur l’analyse de Fourier à fenêtre. Comptes Rendus Acad. Sci. Paris Sér. I 312, 259–261 (1991) MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dodgson, N.A.: Image resampling. Technical Report UCAM-CL-TR-261, University of Cambridge (1992). ISSN: 1476-2986 Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hardy, R.L.: Multiquadric equations of topographic and other irregular surfaces. J. Geophys. Res. 76, 1905–1915 (1971) Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hardy, R.L., Gopfert, W.M.: Least squares prediction of gravity anomalies, geoidal undulations, and deflections of the vertical with multiquadric harmonic functions. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2(10), 423–427 (1975) Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hardy, R.L., Nelson, S.A.: A multiquadric-biharmonic representation and approximation of disturbing potential. Geophys. Res. Lett. 13(1), 18–21 (1986) Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Iserles, A.: A First Course in the Numerical Analysis of Differential Equations. Cambridge Texts in Applied Mathematics. Cambridge University Press, New York (1996) Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Malvar, H.S.: Lapped transforms for efficient transform/subband coding. IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process. 38, 969–978 (1990) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Malvar, H.S., Staelin, D.H.: The LOT: transform coding without blocking effects. IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process. 37, 553–559 (1989) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mayo, A.: The fast solution of Poisson’s and the biharmonic equations on irregular regions. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 21(2), 285–299 (1984) CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Micchelli, C.A.: Inerpolation of scattered data: distance matrices and conditionaly positive definite functions. Constr. Approx. 1, 11–22 (1986) CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rabut, C.: Elementary m-harmonic cardinal B-splines. Numer. Algorithms 2, 39–62 (1992) MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Saito, N., Remy, J.-F.: A new local sine transform without overlaps: A combination of computational harmonic analysis and PDE. In: M.A. Unser, A. Aldroubi, A.F. Laine (eds.) Wavelets: Applications in Signal and Image Processing X. Proc. SPIE, vol. 5207, pp. 495–506 (2003) Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Saito, N., Remy, J.-F.: The polyharmonic local sine transform: A new tool for local image analysis and synthesis without edge effect. Appl. Comput. Harmon. Anal. 20(1), 41–73 (2006) MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Unser, M., Van De Ville, D., Blu, T.: Isotropic polyharmonic B-splines: Scaling functions and wavelets. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 14(11), 1798–1813 (2005) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wahba, G.: Spline Models for Observational Data. CBMS-NSF Regional Conference Series in Applied Mathematics, vol. 59. SIAM, Philadelphia (1990) MATHGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wang, Z., Bovik, A.C., Sheikh, H.R., Simoncelli, E.P.: Image quality assessment: From error measurement to structural similarity. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 13(4), 600–613 (2004) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Yamatani, K., Saito, N.: Improvement of DCT-based compression algorithms using Poisson’s equation. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 15(12), 3672–3689 (2006) CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of MathematicsUniversity of CaliforniaDavisUSA
  2. 2.Department of MathematicsAuburn University MontgomeryMontgomeryUSA

Personalised recommendations