Anisotropic Curvature Motion for Structure Enhancing Smoothing of 3D MR Angiography Data
- 98 Downloads
We propose a novel concept of shape prior for the processing of tubular structures in 3D images. It is based on the notion of an anisotropic area energy and the corresponding geometric gradient flow. The anisotropic area functional incorporates a locally adapted template as a shape prior for tubular vessel structures consisting of elongated, ellipsoidal shape models. The gradient flow for this functional leads to an anisotropic curvature motion model, where the evolution is driven locally in direction of the considered template. The problem is formulated in a level set framework, and a stable and robust method for the identification of the local prior is presented. The resulting algorithm is able to smooth the vessels, pushing solution toward elongated cylinders with round cross sections, while bridging gaps in the underlying raw data. The implementation includes a finite-element scheme for numerical accuracy and a narrow band strategy for computational efficiency.
Keywordsanisotropic mean curvature motion denoising and reconstruction local classification
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 3.B. Andrews, “Volume-preserving anisotropic mean curvature flow,” Indiana University Mathematics Journal, Vol. 50, pp. 783–827, 1991.Google Scholar
- 4.E. Bullit, A. Aylward, A. Liu, S. Mukherji, J. Stone, C. Coffey, G. Gerig, and S.M. Pizer, “3d graph description of the intracerebral vasculature from segmented mra and test of accuracy by comparison with X-ray angiograms,” in: Information Processing in Medical Imaging (IPMI), 1999 pp. 308–321.Google Scholar
- 5.A. Chung and J. Noble, “Statistical 3d vessel segmentation using a rician distribution,” in Proc. Medical Image Conference and Computer Assisted Interventions (MICCAI), 1999, pp. 82–89.Google Scholar
- 6.U. Clarenz, G. Dziuk, and M. Rumpf, “On generalized mean curvature flow in surface processing,” in Geometric Analysis and Nonlinear Partial Differential Equations, H. Karcher, S. Hildebrandt (Eds.), Springer, 2003, pp. 217–248.Google Scholar
- 12.A. Frangi, W.J. Niessen, K.L. Vincken, and M.A. Viergever, Vessel enhancement filterin,” in Proc. Medical Image Conference and Computer Assisted Interventions (MICCAI), 1998, pp. 130–137.Google Scholar
- 16.K. Krissian, G. Malandain, and N. Ayache, “Directional anisotropic diffusion applied to segmentation of vessels in 3d images,” in Proc. Int’l Conf. Scale-Space, 1997, pp. 345–348.Google Scholar
- 18.L. Lorigo, O. Faugeras, W. Grimson, R. Keriven, R. Kikinis, A. Nabavi, and C. Westin, “Codimension-two geodesic active contours for the segmentation of tubular structures,” in CVPR’2000, CVPR, 2000, pp 444–451.Google Scholar
- 20.V. Prinet, O. Monga, C. Ge, L. Sheng, and S. Ma, “Thin network extraction in 3d images: Application to medical angiograms,” in: Int. Conf. on Pattern Recognition, 1996 pp. 386–390.Google Scholar
- 22.J.A. Sethian, Level Set Methods and Fast Marching Methods, Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
- 23.R. Whitaker, “Volumetric deformable models: active blobs,” in: Visualization in Biomedical Computing, 1994 pp 122–134.Google Scholar
- 24.G. Wulff, “Zur Frage der Geschwindigkeit des Wachstums und der Auflösung der Kristallflächen,” Zeitschrift der Kristallographie, Vol. 34, pp. 449–530, 1901.Google Scholar