Journal of Logic, Language and Information

, Volume 21, Issue 3, pp 325–346

Theognis of Megara and the Divine Creating Power in the Framework of Semiotic Textology: An Application of János Sándor Petöfi’s Theory to Archaic Greek Literature

Article

Abstract

This paper is a demonstration of an application of Semiotic Textology to a limited case study. The main aspects of Semiotic Textology, the theory elaborated by Petöfi, are presented; secondly the linguistic aspects of the interpretation of lines 133–134 of the Theognis of Megara’s poem, analysed in the framework of said theory, are presented. All the relevant syntactic, semantic, pragmatic information involved in text processing have been considered. Through fixed steps, it is shown that text processing is not exclusively a grammatical activity, because within a theoretical interpretation an Interpreter needs a number of contextual hypotheses, in order to understand the author’s ontology.

Keywords

Semiotic Textology János Sándor Petöfi Theognis of Megara Text processing Theoretical interpretation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Austin J. (1962) How to do things with words. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  2. de Beaugrande R., Dressler W. U. (1981) Introduction to text linguistics. Longman, LondonGoogle Scholar
  3. Dodds E. (1951) The Greeks and the irrational. University of California Press, Berkeley, Los AngelesGoogle Scholar
  4. Giuffrè M. (2011) Demosthenes and the Greek Oral Culture in the framework of Semiotic Textology. An application of János Sándor Petöfi’s theory to Classical Greek Literature. In: Giuffrè M. (eds) Sprachtheorie und Germanistische Linguistik. Studies in Semiotic Textology in Honour of János S. Petöfi. Nodus Publikationen, Münster, pp 65–98Google Scholar
  5. Heydrich W. (1978) Argumentrollenindicatoren. In: Biasci C., Fritsche J. (eds) Texttheorie-Textrepräsentation. Theoretische Grundlagen der kanonischensinnsemantischen Repräsentation von Texten. Buske, Hamburg, pp 97–114Google Scholar
  6. Heydrich, W. (1980). A System of argument-role indicators. In H. J. Eikmeyer, W. Heydrich, J. S. Petöfi (Eds.), Some aspects of formal foundation in text semantics (pp. 53–72). Bielefeld: Projekt Formale Textsemantik (= Materialien des Universitätsschwerpunktes Mathematisierung der Einzelwissenschaften, Heft XXVI).Google Scholar
  7. Jaynes J. (1976) The origin of consciousness in the breakdown of the bicameral mind. Houghton Mifflin, BostonGoogle Scholar
  8. La Matina M. (1994) Il testo antico. L’Epos, PalermoGoogle Scholar
  9. La Matina M. (2001) Il problema del significante. Carocci, RomaGoogle Scholar
  10. McLuhan M. (1962) The gutenberg galaxy. University of Toronto Press, TorontoGoogle Scholar
  11. Montague R. (1974) Formal philosophy: Selected papers of Richard Montague. Yale University Press, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  12. Morris, C. W. (1938). Foundations of the Theory of Signs. In V. V., A. A. (Eds.), Towards an international encyclopaedia of unified science. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Ogden C. K., Richards I. A. (1923) The meaning of meaning (8th Ed). Harcourt, Brace & World, Inc, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. Petöfi J. S. (1971) Transformationsgrammatiken und eine ko-textuelle Texttheorie. Grundfragen und Konzeptionen. Athenäum, FrankfurtGoogle Scholar
  15. Petöfi J. S. (1973) Towards an empirically motivated grammatical theory of verbal texts. In: Petöfi J. S., Rieser H. (eds) Studies in text grammar. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp 205–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Petöfi J. S. (1978) A formal semiotic text theory as an integrated theory of natural languages. In: Dressler W. (eds) Current trends in text linguistics. de Gruyter, Berlin, pp 35–46Google Scholar
  17. Petöfi, J. S. (1980). Representation Languages and their Function in Text Interpretation. In H. J. Eikmeyer, W. Heydrich, & J. S. Petöfi (Eds.), Some aspects of formal foundation in text semantics (pp. 73–131). Bielefeld: Projekt Formale Textsemantik (= Materialien des Universitätsschwerpunktes Mathematisierung der Einzelwissenschaften, Heft XXVI).Google Scholar
  18. Petöfi J. S. (1982) Meaning, text interpretation, pragmatic-semantic text classes. Poetics 11: 435–491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Petöfi J. S. (1983) Das Forschungsobjekt X und Aspekte der X-logie. In: Faust M., Harweg R., Lehfeldt W., Wienold G. (eds) Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft. Gunter Narr, Tübingen, pp 403–415Google Scholar
  20. Petöfi J. S. (1984) Constitution and meaning: a semiotic text-theoretical approach. In: Conte M. E., Petöfi J. S. (eds) Text and discourse connectedness. Proceedings of the Conference on Connexity and Coherence. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, Philadelphia, pp 507–542Google Scholar
  21. Petöfi, J. S. (1988). La struttura della comunicazione in Atti 20, 17-38. In G. Galli (a cura), Interpretazione e strutture. Le strutture del discorso di Paolo a Mileto (pp. 123–176). Torino: Marietti.Google Scholar
  22. Petöfi, J. S. (1989). Readers and reader models. In Versus. Quaderni di studi semiotici, 52/53 (gennaio-maggio) (pp. 43–52).Google Scholar
  23. Petöfi J. S. (1995) Die semiotische Textologie und die pragmatischen Aspekte der Kommunikation. In: Kertész A. (eds) Sprache als Kognition. Sprache als Interaktion. Studien zum Grammatik-Pragmatik-Verhältnis. Peter Lang, Frankfurt am Main-Berlin, pp 59–99Google Scholar
  24. Petöfi, J. S. (1996). Dal testo alla comunicazione umana multimediale. In J. S. Petöfi & L. Vitacolonna (Eds.), Sistemi segnici e loro uso nella comunicazione umana 3. La Testologia semiotica e la comunicazione umana multimediale (pp. 51–65). Macerata: Quaderni di Ricerca e Didattica dell’ Università n. XVII, Dipartimento di Filosofia e Scienze umane.Google Scholar
  25. Alcuni aspetti della Testologia Semiotica. Modello segnico—Tipi di interpretazione. In J. S. Petöfi (Ed.), Sistemi segnici e loro uso nella comunicazione umana 5. Comunicazione visiva: parole e immagini in comunicati statici (pp. 21–30).: Quaderni di ricerca e didattica XX, Dipartimento di filosofia e Scienze Umane.Google Scholar
  26. Petöfi J. S. (2004) Scrittura e interpretazione. Introduzione alla Testologia Semiotica dei testi verbali. Carocci, RomaGoogle Scholar
  27. Petöfi J. S., Olivi T. (1989) Understanding literary texts. A semiotic textological approach. In: Meutsch D., Viehoff R. (eds) Comprehension of literary discourse. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, NY, pp 190–225Google Scholar
  28. Snell B. (1963) Die Entdeckung des Geistes. Studien zur Entstehung des europäischen Denkens bei den Griechen. Claassen Verlag, HamburgGoogle Scholar
  29. Toselli S., Olivi T. (1996) Verso la testologia semiotica dei testi multimediali. In: Petöfi J. S., Vitacolonna L. (eds) Sistemi segnici e loro uso nella comunicazione umana 3. La Testologia semiotica e la comunicazione umana multimediale. Quaderni di Ricerca e Didattica dell’Università à di Macerata n. XVII, Dipartimento di Filosofia e Scienze umane, Macerata, pp 154–161Google Scholar
  30. Young D. (1971) Theognis. Post Ernestum Diehl iterum edidit Douglas Young. Bibliotheca Scriptorum Graecorum et Romanorum Teubneriana, LeipzigGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dipartimento di Scienze Filologiche e LinguisticheEdificio 12, Universita’ di PalermoTrapani, SicilyItaly

Personalised recommendations