Children’s Application of Theory of Mind in Reasoning and Language
Many social situations require a mental model of the knowledge, beliefs, goals, and intentions of others: a Theory of Mind (ToM). If a person can reason about other people’s beliefs about his own beliefs or intentions, he is demonstrating second-order ToM reasoning. A standard task to test second-order ToM reasoning is the second-order false belief task. A different approach to investigating ToM reasoning is through its application in a strategic game. Another task that is believed to involve the application of second-order ToM is the comprehension of sentences that the hearer can only understand by considering the speaker’s alternatives. In this study we tested 40 children between 8 and 10 years old and 27 adult controls on (adaptations of) the three tasks mentioned above: the false belief task, a strategic game, and a sentence comprehension task. The results show interesting differences between adults and children, between the three tasks, and between this study and previous research.
KeywordsFalse belief Second-order reasoning Sentence comprehension Strategic game Theory of Mind
We thank the children and staff of the St. Jorisschool in Heumen and the Christelijke Basisschool De Bron in Marum for their cooperation. Pauline Vrieling and Daniëlle Koks were so kind as to allow us to use their materials for our language experiment. We also thank the participants of the workshop “Formal models for real people” and two anonymous reviewers of this journal for their valuable suggestions and comments. Rineke Verbrugge gratefully acknowledges the NIAS (Netherlands Institute for Advanced Studies in the Humanities and Social Sciences) for awarding her a fellowship in the framework of the project ‘Games, Action, and Social Software’. Furthermore, we gratefully acknowledge the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research, NWO (Grants No. 051-04-120 and 400-05-710 for Verbrugge, Grant No. 051-02-070 for Krämer and Hendriks, and Grants no. 277-70-005 and 015-001-103 for Hendriks).
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
- Binmore K. (1992) Fun and games: A text on game theory. D.C. Heath and Company, Lexington, MAGoogle Scholar
- Flobbe, L. (2006). Children’s development of reasoning about other people’s minds. M.Sc. Thesis Artificial Intelligence, University of Groningen.Google Scholar
- Grice H.P. (1975) Logic and conversation. In: Cole P., Morgan J.L.(eds) Syntax and semantics, vol. III, speech acts. Academic Press, New York, pp 41–58Google Scholar
- Karmiloff-Smith A. (1992) Beyond modularity: A developmental perspective on cognitive science. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
- Mol, L., Verbrugge, R., & Hendriks, P. (2005). Learning to reason about other people’s minds. In L. Hall, D. Heylen, et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Joint Symposium on Virtual Social Agents (pp. 191–198). The Society for the Study of Artificial Intelligence and the Simulation of Behaviour (AISB), Hatfield.Google Scholar
- Osborne M. (2003) An introduction to game theory. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- Premack D., woodruff G. (1978) Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4: 515–526Google Scholar
- Steerneman, P., Meesters, C., & Muris, P. (2003). TOM-test (derde druk). Antwerpen: Garant.Google Scholar
- Termeer, M. (2002). “Een meisje ging twee keer van de glijbaan.” A study of indefinite subject NPs in child language. MA Thesis, Utrecht University.Google Scholar
- Vrieling, P. (2006). Een ezel stoot zich geen twee keer aan dezelfde steen: Dutch children’s interpretation of indefinite subject NPs. MA Thesis, Utrecht University.Google Scholar
- Verbrugge, R., & Mol, L. (2008). Learning to apply theory of mind? Journal of Logic, Language and Information (this issue). doi: 10.1007/s10849-008-9067-4.