Inhibitory Effects of 2,6-Di-O-methyl-3-O-acetyl-β-cyclodextrins with Various Degrees of Substitution of Acetyl Group on Macrophage Activation and Endotoxin Shock Induced by Lipopolysaccharide
- 57 Downloads
- 2 Citations
Abstract
The effects of 2,6-di-O-methyl-3-O-acetyl-β-cyclodextrins (DMA-β-CyD) with various degrees of substitution (DS) of an acetyl group of 1.5, 3.8, 6.3 and 7, which are abbreviated to DMA2-β-CyD, DMA4-β-CyD, DMA6-β-CyD and DMA7-β-CyD, respectively, on murine macrophage activation and endotoxin shock induced by lipopolysaccharide (LPS) were examined. Of four DMA-β-CyDs used in the present study, cytotoxicity of DMA-β-CyDs in RAW264.7 cells, a murine macrophage-like cell line, decreased with an increase in the DS values of DMA-β-CyD, and DMA7-β-CyD had no cytotoxicity on RAW264.7 cells up to 100 mM. DMA2-β-CyD and DMA7-β-CyD at the concentration of 5 mM had greater inhibitory effects on nitric oxide (NO) production in RAW264.7 cells stimulated with LPS than DMA4-β-CyD and DMA6-β-CyD. In addition, these inhibitory effects of DMA2-β-CyD and DMA7-β-CyD were concentration-dependent. In the in vivo study, all of the mice died within 12 h after intraperitoneal administration of the solution containing LPS and d-galactosamine. When 100 mM DMA7-β-CyD was concomitantly administered with both LPS and d-galactosamine intraperitoneally in mice, the survival rate significantly increased, but DMA4-β-CyD and DMA6-β-CyD did not. In conclusion, we revealed that DS values of DMA-β-CyDs strikingly affect not only the cytotoxic activity but also the inhibitory effects of LPS-induced NO production in RAW264.7 cells and fatality of endotoxin shock mice induced by LPS and d-galactosamine. These results suggest the potential use of DMA7-β-CyD as an antagonist of LPS-induced endotoxin shock.
Keywords
degree of substitution dimethylacetyl-β-cyclodextrin endotoxin shock lipopolysaccharide nitric oxideAbbreviation
- CyDs
cyclodextrins
- DMA-β-CyD
2,6-di-O-methyl-3-O-acetyl-β-cyclodextrin
- DM-β-CyD
2,6-di-O-methyl-β-CyD
- DM-α-CyD
2,6-di-O-methyl-α-CyD
- DS
degree of the substitution
- iNOS
inducible nitric oxide synthase
- LPS
lipopolysaccharide
- NO
nitric oxide
- RT-PCR
reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction
- TLR-4
Toll-like receptor-4
- TNF-α
tumor necrosis factor-α
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Acknowledgements
This work was partially supported by a Grant-in-aid of Sagawa Foundation for Promotion of Frontier Science and Grant-in-aid of Japan Science and Technology Agency.
References
- 1.Marshall J.C. (2003) Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2: 391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.Riedemann N.C., Guo R.F., Ward P.A., (2003) Nat. Med. 9: 517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.Healy D.P., (2002) Ann. Pharmacother. 36: 648CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Kaneko K., Ueda R., Nemoto H., Iijima H., Yoshimura T. (2003) Xenobiotica 33: 323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Karima R., Matsumoto S., Higashi H., Matsushima K. (1999) Mol. Med. Today 5:123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Fissell W.H., Lou L., Abrishami S., Buffington D.A., Humes H.D. (2003) J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 14: 454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Angus D.C., Linde-Zwirble W.T., Clermont G., Griffin M.F., Clark R.H. (2001) Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 164: 1154Google Scholar
- 8.Angus D.C., Birmingham M.C., Balk R.A., Scannon P.J., Collins D., Kruse J.A., Graham D.R., Dedhia H.V., Homann S., MacIntyre N., (2000) JAMA 283: 1723CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Dunn D.L. (2000) Surg. Infect. 1: 227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Uekama K., Otagiri M., (1987) Crit. Rev. Ther. Drug Carrier Syst. 3: 1Google Scholar
- 11.Szente L., Szejtli J. (1999) Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 36: 17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Ohtani Y., Irie T., Uekama K., Fukunaga K., Pitha J. (1989) Eur. J. Biochem. 186: 17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Fauvelle F., Debouzy J.C., Crouzy S., Goschl M., Chapron Y., (1997) J. Pharm. Sci. 86: 935CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Simons K., Ehehalt R., (2002) J. Clin. Invest. 110: 597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Van Laethem F., Leo O., (2002) Curr. Mol. Med..2, 557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Galbiati F., Razani B., Lisanti M.P., (2001) Cell 106: 403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Anderson R.G., Jacobson K. (2002) Science 296: 1821CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Arima H., Nishimoto Y., Motoyama K., Hirayama F., Uekama K., (2001) Pharm. Res. 18: 1167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Motoyama K., Arima H., Nishimoto Y., Miyake K., Hirayama F., Uekama K., (2005). FEBS Lett. 579: 1707CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.H. Arima, K. Motoyama, A. Matsukawa, Y. Nishimoto, F. Hirayama and K. Uekama: Biochem. Pharmacol. 70, 1506 (2005)Google Scholar
- 21.Muller B.W., Brauns U., (1986) J. Pharm. Sci. 75: 571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.Rao C.T., Pitha J., Lindberg B., Lindberg J. (1992) Carbohydr. Res. 223: 99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.Harata K., Rao C.T., (1993) Carbohydr. Res. 247: 83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.Hirayama F., Mieda S., Miyamoto Y., Arima H., Uekama K. (1999) J. Pharm. Sci. 88: 970CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.Ono N., Arima H., Hirayama F., Uekama K., (2001) Biol. Pharm. Bull. 24: 395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 26.Hamasaki K., Kogure K., Ohwada K., (1996) Toxicon 34: 490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 27.Stuehr D.J., Nathan C.F., (1989). J. Exp. Med. 169: 1543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 28.Uekama K., Hirayama F., Irie T., (1998). Chem. Rev. 98: 2045CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 29.Brewster M.E., Estes K., Loftsson T., Perchalski R., Derendorf H., Mullersman G., Bodor N. (1988) J. Pharm. Sci. 77: 981CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 30.Anton B., Mark B., Ken C., John K.C., Jan E., Helen F., Elizabeth J.M., Alan W.M., Ronald P., David C.R., Ming Q.Z., (2002) Angew. Chem. 114: 276Google Scholar