Advertisement

Humanoid Robot as a Teacher’s Assistant: Helping Children with Autism to Learn Social and Academic Skills

  • Uvais Qidwai
  • Saad Bin Abul KashemEmail author
  • Olcay Conor
Article

Abstract

Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) is becoming a growing concern worldwide. Parents are often not aware of the different nature of children with ASD and attempt to treat him/her the same way as other children. However, that causes more and more isolation of such children from the social interactions around them, resulting in more secluded and people-phobic behaviors. Nevertheless, similar to other children, children with ASD also like to play with toys. This observation has led to the use of toys in a way that mere playful activities could become sources of learning and skill-building, somewhat serving or assisting in the role of a human teacher. Robots have been observed to be fascinating for all children and compensating for a human companion to a certain extent. In this paper, a short study has been presented involving a humanoid robot programmed for a number of teaching and therapeutic behaviors, such as exercises, singing, explaining, and playing with children. Tests were performed on a small group of 15 children with ASD (ages 7–11) using these activities at a local school for children with special needs for a number of weeks. The objective of the study was to quantify the improvement in a number of behavior and learning parameters when children performed the activities with NAO robot present with the teacher, as opposed to the same type of activities performed by the teacher alone. The performance improvement was quantified in terms of the NAO robot activity as independent variable, and following dependent behavioral variables observed from the responses of children: (a) number of trials, (b) activity response time, (c) response type, and (d) behavior retention. Quantified findings from these tests are reported in this paper against average performance values (based on teachers and psychologists’ evaluation). The results of the study have been found to be very encouraging which demonstrates the capability of robotic toys to improve the learning process for children with ASD. The results of this study also encourage the low-cost development and usage of such robotic toy systems for teaching and therapeutic applications that help such children to become better members of society.

Keywords

Autism Spectrum disorder (ASD) Human robot Interface (HRI) NAO robot Interactive games Robot-based games 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the KINDI Research Center and Shafallah (Center for Children with Special Needs) that provided the platform to gain practical experience and to develop innovative solutions to improve the future of our country. We would also like to acknowledge the support of the Step by Step School Qatar, the Shafallah Institute Qatar, and the Al-Awsaj Academy Qatar.

References

  1. 1.
    Meresca R. and de Magistris L., “Autism: what is it?” in translational approaches to Autism Spectrum Disorder, pp. 1–10 (2015)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hutchison D. and Mitchell J. C., “A survey on storytelling with robots,” in 6th International Conference on E-Learning and Games, pp. 450–456 (2011)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Peca, A., Simut, R., Pintea, S., Vanderborght, B.: Are children with ASD more prone to test the intentions of the Robonova robot compared to a human? Int. J. Soc. Robot. 7(5), 629–639 (2015)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Boucenna, S., Narzisi, A., Tilmont, E., Muratori, F., Pioggia, G., Cohen, D.: Interactive technologies for autistic children: a review. Cogn. Comput. 6(4), 722–740 (2014)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Aresti-bartolome, N., Garcia-zapirain, B.: Technologies as support tools for persons with autistic Spectrum disorder: a systematic review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 11(8), 7767–7802 (2014)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Coeckelbergh, M., Pop, C., Simut, R., Peca, A., Pintea, S., David, D.: A survey of expectations about the role of robots in robot-assisted therapy for children with ASD: ethical acceptability, trust, sociability, appearance, and attachment. Sci. Eng. Ethics. 21(6), 1–19 (2015)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cabibihan, J.J., Javed, H., Ang Jr., M.: Why robots? A survey on the roles and benefits of social robots in the therapy of children with autism. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 5(4), 593–618 (2013)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Belpaeme, T., Kennedy, J., Ramachandran, A., Scassellati, B., Tanaka, F.: Social robots for education: a review. Science Robotics. 3(21), R. 65 (2018)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Han, J.-H., Jo, M.-H., Jones, V., Jo, J.-H.: Comparative study on the educational use of home robots for children. J. Inform. Proc. Syst. 4, 159–168 (2008)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mun, K.H., Kwon, J.Y., Lee, B.H., Jung, J.S.: Design developing an early model of cat robot for the use of early treatment of children with autism Spectrum disorder ( ASD ). Int. J. Control Autom. 7(11), 59–74 (2014)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ranatunga I., Beltran M., Torres N.A., Bugnariu N., Patterson R.M., Garver C., and Popa D.O., “Human-robot upper body gesture imitation analysis for autism Spectrum disorders,” in 5th International Conference, ICSR, pp. 218–228 (2013)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Huskens, B., Palmen, A., Van Der Werff, M.: Improving collaborative play between children with autism Spectrum disorders and their siblings: the effectiveness of a robot-mediated intervention based on Lego Ò therapy. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 45(11), 3746–3755 (2015)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wainer, J., Robins, B., Amirabdollahian, F., Dautenhahn, K.: Using the humanoid robot KASPAR to autonomously play triadic games and facilitate collaborative play among children with autism. IEEE Trans. Auton. Ment. Dev. 6(3), 183–199 (2014)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Duquette, A., Michaud, F., Mercier, H.: Exploring the use of a mobile robot as an imitation agent with children with low-functioning autism. Auton. Robot. 24(2), 147–157 (2008)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ricks, Daniel J., and Mark B. Colton. "Trends and considerations in robot-assisted autism therapy." In Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2010 IEEE International Conference on, pp. 4354–4359. IEEE, (2010)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mazzei, Daniele, Lucia Billeci, Antonino Armato, Nicole Lazzeri, Antonio Cisternino, Giovanni Pioggia, Roberta Igliozzi, Filippo Muratori, Arti Ahluwalia, and Danilo De Rossi. "The face of autism." In RO-MAN, 2010 IEEE, pp. 791–796. IEEE, (2010)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Leapfrog Schoolhouse, LeapPad: Tag Research Comparison, Retrieved October 27, 2018. http://www.follettlearning.com/wps/wcm/connect/b0a51fa1-d26f-42af-83d0-f7b760202e3e/leapfrog-research.pdf?MOD=AJPERES
  18. 18.
    Who is NAO? Available: https://www.aldebaran.com/ (Accessed: July 17, 2017)
  19. 19.
    Bonarini A., Clasadonte F., Garzotto F., Gelsomini M., and Romero M., "Playful interaction with Teo, a Mobile robot for children with neurodevelopmental disorders," in Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Software Development and Technologies for Enhancing Accessibility and Fighting Info-Exclusion, Vila Real, Portugal, pp. 223–231 (2016)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Chen, C.-H., Lee, I.-J., Lin, L.-Y.: Augmented reality-based video modeling storybook of nonverbal facial cues for children with autism Spectrum disorder to improve their perceptions and judgments of facial expressions and emotions. Comput. Hum. Behav. 55, 477–485 (2016)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Cai, H., Fang, Y., Ju, Z., Costescu, C., David, D., Billing, E., Ziemke, T., et al.: Sensing-enhanced therapy system for assessing children with autism Spectrum disorders: a feasibility study. IEEE Sensors J. (2018)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Shamsuddin S. et al., "Initial response in HRI- a case study on evaluation of child with autism Spectrum disorders interacting with a humanoid robot NAO," in proceedings of the IEEE 8th international colloquium on Signal Processing and its Applications, pp. 188–193 (2016)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Barakova, E.I., Gillesen, J.C.C., Huskens, B.E.B.M., Lourens, T.: End-user programming architecture facilitates the uptake of robots in social therapies. Rob. Auton. Syst. 61(7), 704–713 (2013)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Barakova, E.I., Bajracharya, P., Willemsen, M., Lourens, T., Huskens, B.: Long-term LEGO therapy with humanoid robot for children. Expert. Syst. 00(00), (2014)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Yang, Xue, Mei-Ling Shyu, Han-Qi Yu, Shi-ming Sun, Nian-Sheng Yin, and Wei Chen. "Integrating image and textual information in human-robot interactions for children with autism Spectrum disorder (ASD)." IEEE Transactions on Multimedia (2018)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Qidwai, U., Shakir, M.: Electromyography controlled robotic toys for autistic children. Int. J. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2(1), (2015)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Qidwai U., “Using course projects to tackle social problems: use of robots for children with ASD,” in the International Forum on Engineering Education, pp. 1–11 (2015)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Qidwai U., Shakir M., and Connor O.B., “Robotic toys for autistic children: innovative tools for teaching and treatment,” in 2013 7th IEEE GCC Conference and Exhibition, GCC 2013, , pp. 188–192 (2013)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Qidwai U., Shakir M., Hakouz W., and Musa N., “Wirelessly controlled Mimicing humanoid robot,” in Computer Systems and Applications (AICCSA), pp. 156–160 (2014)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ismail, M.Z., Azaman, N.I.L., Khalid, N.K.: Application of robots to improve social and communication skills among autistic children. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 12(1), 421–430 (2012)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Conti, D., Trubia, G., Buono, S., Nuovo S., and Nuovo, A., "Evaluation of a robot-assisted therapy for children with autism and intellectual disability", Annual Conference Towards Autonomous Robotic Systems, July 2018, pp. 405–415Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    David, D., Costescu, C., and Matu, S., "Effects of a robot-enhanced intervention for children with ASD on teaching turn-taking skills", J. Educ. Comput. Res., February 22, 2019,  https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633119830344
  33. 33.
    Huijnen, C., Lexis, M., Jansens, R., de Witte, L.: Roles, strengths and challenges of using robots in interventions for children with autism Spectrum disorder (ASD). J. Autism Dev. Disord. 49(1), 11–21 (January 2019)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    So, W., Wong, M., Lam, W., Cheng, C., Ku, S., Lam, K., Huang, W., Wong, W.: Who is a better teacher for children with autism? Comparison of learning outcomes between robot-based and human-based interventions in gestural production and recognition. Res. Dev. Disabil. 86, 62–75 (March 2019).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2019.01.002 Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Alnajjar, F., Renawi, A., Cappuccio, M., and Mubain, O., "A Low-Cost Autonomous Attention Assessment System for Robot Intervention with Autistic Children", 2019 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), April 2019,  https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON.2019.8725132
  36. 36.
    Khosla, K. Nguyen, and M.-T. Chu, “Socially assistive robot enabled home-based Care for Supporting People with autism,” in Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems, Paper 12 (2015)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Computer Science and EngineeringQatar UniversityDohaQatar
  2. 2.Qatar Armed Forces-Academic Bridge ProgramQatar FoundationDohaQatar
  3. 3.Step by Step SchoolDohaQatar

Personalised recommendations