Advertisement

Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems

, Volume 93, Issue 1–2, pp 135–150 | Cite as

Observer-Based Time-Varying Backstepping Control for a Quadrotor Multi-Agent System

  • Marcos A. Rosaldo-SerranoEmail author
  • Jesús Santiaguillo-Salinas
  • Eduardo Aranda-Bricaire
Article
  • 88 Downloads

Abstract

This paper studies the formation tracking problem for a multi-agent system composed by a set of quadrotor UAVs. Parrot AR.Drone 2.0 quadrotors are used as agents of the system. The AR.Drone 2.0 features an internal controller to stabilize the angular dynamics. This controller is modelled and identified through the least squares method. The proposed control strategy is designed using a time-varying version of the backstepping technique for each agent. For the implementation of the control law, it is assumed that each agent measures only the leader and its own positions, while the leader also knows the desired trajectory the system must follow. Linear and angular velocities of the agents are estimated using suitable Luenberger observers. The proposed control strategy allows the leader agent to converge asymptotically to a predetermined flight trajectory while the follower agents converge asymptotically to their own trajectories defined by the leader position and a constant formation vector. The theoretical results are validated through real-time experiments.

Keywords

Unmanned aerial vehicles Multi-agent systems Formation tracking Backstepping Velocity observers 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgements

A short version of this paper was presented in the 2017 International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems (ICUAS’17), that was held in Miami, FL USA, on 13-16 June 2017. The work of M.A. Rosaldo-Serrando and J. Santiaguillo-Salinas was supported by CONACYT, México, thought scholarships No. 345679 and 243226.

References

  1. 1.
    Fyler, D., Sullivan, B., Raptis, I.A.: Distributed object manipulation using a mobile Multi-Agent system. In: IEEE Int. Conf. Technologies for practical robot application, Woburn, pp. 1–6 (2015)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Becker, M., Blatt, F., Szczerbicka, H.: A multi-agent flooding algorithm for search and rescue operations in unknown terrain. In: Multiagent system technologies, lecture notes in computer science, vol. 8076. Springer, Berlin (2013)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Vallejo, D., Monekosso, P., Jimenez, D.N., Gonzalez, L.: A multi-agent architecture for multi-robot surveillance, vol. 5796. Springer, Berlin (2009)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Vargas-Jacob, J.A., Corona-Sánchez, J.J., Rodríguez-Cortés, H.: Experimenhtal implementation of a leader-follower strategy for quadrotors using a distributed architecture. J. Intell. Robot. Syst. 84, 435–452 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Muñoz, F., Espinoza, E.S., García-Carrillo, L.R., Márquez, M.A.: Semi-global leader-follower consensus for networked unmanned multi-aircraft systems with input saturation. In: 2017 international conference on unmanned aircraft systems (ICUAS), Miami (2017)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Vallejo, D., Monekosso, P., Jimenez, D.N., Gonzalez, L.: A multi-agent architecture for multi-robot surveillance. In: 2017 international conference on unmanned aircraft systems (ICUAS), Miami (2017)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Acevedo, J.J., Arrue, B.C., Maza, I., Ollero, A.: A distributed framework for surveillance missions with aerial robots including dynamic assignment of the detected intruders. In: Proceedings of the international conference on unmanned aircraft systems (ICUAS 2016), pp. 1212–1219 (2016)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Spedicato, S., Notarstefano, G., Bulthoff, H., Franchi, A.: Aggressive maneuver regulation of a quadrotor UAV. In: Robotics research: The 16th international symposium ISRR 2016, pp. 95–112. Springer International Publishing (2016)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pestana, J., Sanchez-Lopez, J.L., Campoy, P., Saripalli, S.: Vision based gps-denied object tracking and following for unmanned aerial vehicles. In: IEEE international symposium on safety security and rescue robotics, pp. 1–6 (2013)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Li, K., Phang, S.K., Chen, B.M., Lee, T.H.: Platform design and mathematical modeling of an ultralight quadrotor micro aerial vehicle. In: Proceedings of the international conference on unmanned aircraft systems (ICUAS 2013) (2013)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Krajník, T., Vonásek, V., Fiser, D., Faigl, J.: AR-drone as a platform for robotic research and education. In: Research and education in robotics - EUROBOT 2011: international conference, pp. 15–17. Prague, Czech Republic (2011)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Garcia, G.A., Kim, A.R., Jackson, E., Keshmiri, S.S., Shukla, D.: Modeling and flight control of a commercial Nano Quadrotor. In: 2017 International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems (ICUAS), Miami (2017)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    García-Carrillo, L.R., Dzul-López, A.E., Lozano, R., Pégard, C.: Modeling the Quad-Rotor Mini-Rotorcraft. In: Quad Rotorcraft Control, Advances in Industrial Control, pp. 23–34. Springer, London (2013)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bristeau, P.J., Callou, F., Vissiére, D., Petit, N.: The navigation and control technology inside the AR.drone micro UAV. In: 18th IFAC World congress (2011)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Aboutalebi, P., Abbaspour, A., Forouzannezhad, P., Sargolzaei, A.: A novel sensor fault detection in an unmanned quadrotor based on adaptive neural observer. In: Journal of intelligent & robotic systems (2017)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Abbaspour, A., Aboutalebi, P., Yen, K.K., Sargolzaei, A.: Neural adaptive observer-based sensor and actuator fault detection in nonlinear systems: application in UAV. In: ISA transactions, vol. 67, pp. 317–329 (2017)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kokotovic, P.V.: The joy of feedback: nonlinear and adaptive. IEEE Control. Syst. Mag. 12, 7–17 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Krstic, M., Kokotovic, P.V.: Nonlinear and adaptive control design. Wiley, New York (1995)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Khalil, H.K.: Nonlinear systems, pp. 589–603. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River (2002)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Malisoff, M., Mazenc, F.: Constructions of strict lyapunov functions. In: Communications and control engineering, pp. 192–205. Springer (2009)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Electric Engineering DepartmentCINVESTAV-IPNCiudad de MéxicoMéxico
  2. 2.Mechatronics Engineering DepartmentUniversidad del Papaloapan Campus Loma BonitaLoma BonitaMéxico

Personalised recommendations