Multi-UAV Carrier Phase Differential GPS and Vision-based Sensing for High Accuracy Attitude Estimation
- 108 Downloads
This paper presents a cooperative navigation technique which exploits relative vision-based sensing and carrier-phase differential GPS (CDGPS) among antennas embarked on different flying platforms, to provide accurate UAV attitude estimates in real time or in post-processing phase. It is assumed that all UAVs are under nominal GPS coverage. The logical architecture and the main algorithmic steps are highlighted, and the adopted CDGPS processing strategy is described. The experimental setup used to evaluate the proposed approach comprises two multi-rotors and two ground antennas, one of which is used as a benchmark for attitude accuracy estimation. Results from flight tests are presented in which the attitude solution obtained by integrating CDGPS and vision (CDGPS/Vision) measurements within and Extended Kalman Filter is compared with estimates provided by the onboard navigation system and with the results of a formerly developed code-based differential GPS (DGPS/Vision) approach. Benchmark-based analyses confirm that CDGPS/Vision approach outperforms both onboard navigation system and DGPS/Vision approach.
KeywordsAttitude estimation CDGPS Vision-based tracking Cooperation UAV
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
This research was carried out in the frame of Programme STAR, financially supported by UniNA and Compagnia di San Paolo. The authors thank Dr. Roberto Opromolla for support during experimental tests.
- 1.Eling, C., Wieland, M., Hess, C., Klingbeil, L., Kuhlmann, H.: Development and evaluation of UAV based mapping system for remote sensing and surveying application. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. XL-1/W4, 233–239 (2015). https://doi.org/10.5194/isprsarchives-XL-1-W4-233-2015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.Jozkow, G., Toth, C., Grejner-Brzezinska, D.: UAS topographic mapping with velodine LiDAR sensor. ISPRS. Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. III-1, 201–208 (2016). https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-III-1-201-2016 Google Scholar
- 4.Rehak, M., Skaloud, J.: Applicability of new approaches of sensor orientation to micro aerial vehicles. XXIII ISPRS Congr. Prague, Czech Repub. III-3, 441–447 (2016)Google Scholar
- 5.Swift Navigation Piksi GNSS modules, https://www.swiftnav.com/piksi-gnss-modules
- 6.Rehak, M., Skaloud, J.: Performance assessment of integrated sensor orientation with a low-cost GNSS receiver. In: International Conference on Unmanned Aerial Vehicles in Geomatics, Bonn, Germany, pp. 1–6. ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences (2017)Google Scholar
- 9.Stoecker, C., Nex, F., Koeva, M., Gerke, M.: Quality assessment of combined IMU/GNSS data for direct georeferencing in the context of UAV-based mapping. In: International Conference on Unmanned Aerial Vehicles in Geomatics, Bonn, Germany, pp. 1–7. ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences (2017)Google Scholar
- 12.Vetrella, A.R., Fasano, G., Accardo, D.: Cooperative attitude estimation for UAV swarms based on tight integration of GNSS and vision measurements. Submitt. to IEEE Trans. RobotGoogle Scholar
- 14.Cheng, Y., Shuster, M.D.: QUEST and the anti-QUEST?: good and evil attitude estimation. J. Astronaut. Sci. 53, 337–351 (2005)Google Scholar
- 15.Vetrella, A.R., Causa, F., Renga, A., Fasano, G., Accardo, D., Grassi, M.: Flight demonstration of multi-UAV CDGPS and vision-based sensing for high accuracy attitude estimation. In: 2017 International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems (ICUAS), pp. 237–246. IEEE (2017)Google Scholar
- 16.Farrell, J.: Aided navigation: GPS with high rate sensors. McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York (2008)Google Scholar
- 19.Montenbruck, O., Wermuth, M., Kahle, R., Zentrum, D., Dlr, R.: GPS based relative navigation for the TanDEM-X mission - first flight results. Earth 58, 2797–2807 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-4296.2011.tb02587.x Google Scholar
- 23.Melbourne, W.G.: The case for ranging in GPS-based geodetic systems. In: 1st International Symposium on Precise Positioning with the Global Positioning System, pp. 373–386. Rockville (1985)Google Scholar
- 24.Wübbena, G.: Software developments for geodetic positioning with GPS using TI-4100 code and carrier measurements. In: 1st International Symposium on Precise Positioning with the Global Positioning System, pp. 403–412. Rockville (1985)Google Scholar
- 25.Verhagen, S., Bofeng, L.: LAMBDA Software Package. Matlab Implementation. Version 3, 0 (2012)Google Scholar
- 26.Verhagen, S.: The GNSS integer ambiguities: estimation and validation. J. Geod. (2005)Google Scholar
- 30.Yuanwei, W., Yao, S., Guanghui, W.: Vision-based real-time aerial object localization and tracking for UAV sensing System (2017)Google Scholar
- 31.Comaniciu, D., Ramesh, V., Meer, P.: Real-time tracking of non-rigid objects using mean shift. In: IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pp. 142–149 (2000)Google Scholar
- 33.Tomasi, C., Kanade, T.: Detection and tracking of point features. In: International Journal of Computer Vision, Technical Report CMU-CS-91-132, pp. 1–20 (1991)Google Scholar