Hybrid Consensus-based Control of Nonholonomic Mobile Robot Formation
- 341 Downloads
This paper addresses the hybrid consensus-based formation keeping problem for nonholonomic mobile robots in the presence of a novel time-varying, composite, nonlinear velocity-tracking error system. First, continuous-time regulation and consensus-based formation controllers are developed for a group of wheeled mobile robots. These controllers are then used to create a hybrid automaton, which drives the robots to their goal positions while maintaining a specified formation.In order to avoid the hard switches between regulation and formation keeping controllers, a novel blended velocity tracking error approach is proposed in this work to create nonlinear, time-varying velocity error dynamics. Therefore, the hybrid controller consists of two discrete modes, each with continuous dynamics, and the novel blended velocity tracking error approach provides a smooth transition between each mode. The controller in the regulation mode drives the robot to a goal position while the formation keeping controller ensures that the robots achieve a specified geometric formation prior to reaching their goal-position. Time-varying Lyapunov functions are used to rigorously demonstrate that the formation errors converge to a small bounded region around the origin and the size of the bound can be adjusted by using the switching conditions. Convergence to goal position while in formation is also demonstrated in the same Lyapunov analysis illustrating that the robots are converging to their goal positions while operating in both regulation and formation keeping mode. Simulation results verify the theoretical conjectures.
KeywordsNonholonomic mobile robots Consensus Formation control Hybrid automata Time-varying Lyapunov methods
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 7.Di Paola, D., Naso, D., Turchiano, B.: Consensus-based robust decentralized task assignment for heterogeneous robot networks. American Control Conference (ACC) 2011, 4711–4716 (2011)Google Scholar
- 8.Geng, X.: Consensus-reaching of Multiple Robots with Fewer Interactions. 2009 WRI World Congress on Computer Science and Information Engineering, pp. 249–253 (2009)Google Scholar
- 10.Breivik, M., Subbotin, M., Fossen, T.: Guided formation control for wheeled mobile robots. Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Robot. Autom. pp.1–7 (2006)Google Scholar
- 11.Liang, Y., Lee, H.: Decentralized formation control and obstacle avoidance for multiple robots with nonholonomic constraints. Proc. IEEE Am. Control Conf., 559–5601 (2006)Google Scholar
- 13.Dong, W.J., Guo, G.Y., Farrell, J.A.: Formation Control of Nonholonomic Mobile Robots, vol. 2006. American Control Conference, Minneapolis, MN (2006)Google Scholar
- 14.Maghenem, M., Loria, A., Panteley, E.: Lyapunov-based Formation-Tracking Control of Nonholonomic Systems under Persistency of Excitation. 10th IFAC Symposium on Nonlinear Control Systems (NOLCOS 2016), Monterey, CA, United States (2016)Google Scholar
- 15.Feng, S., Zhang, H.: Formation control for wheeled mobile robots based on consensus protocol. IEEE International Conference on Information and Automation (ICIA), pp. 696–700 (2011)Google Scholar
- 18.Miah, S., Chaoui, H., Sicard, P.: Linear time-varying control law for stabilization of hopping robot during flight phase. IEEE 23rd Int. Symp on Industrial Electronics (ISIE), pp. 1550–1554 (2014)Google Scholar
- 19.Lewis, F.L., Jagannathan, S., Yesildirek, A.: Neural Network Control of Robot Manipulators and Nonlinear Systems. Taylor & Francis, New York (1999)Google Scholar