Nonlinear Control with Swing Damping of a Multirotor UAV with Suspended Load

  • Kristian Klausen
  • Thor I. Fossen
  • Tor Arne Johansen
Article
  • 87 Downloads

Abstract

In this paper, we consider the problem of trajectory tracking of a multirotor Unmanned Aerial Vehicle carrying a suspended payload. The movement of the suspended payload influences the dynamics of the multirotor, which must be appropriately handled by the controller to achieve satisfactory tracking results. We derive a mathematical model of the interconnected multi-body system using Kane’s equations, and develop a non-linear tracking controller based on the backstepping technique. In addition to suppressing the effects of the swinging payload, the controller also compensates for an unknown constant wind disturbance. The origin of the tracking error is proven UGAS (Uniformly Globally Asymptotically Stable) and ULES (Uniformly Locally Exponentially Stable) through Lyapunov analysis. To reduce the swing motion of the suspended load, a nominal swing-free path is generated through open loop shaping filters, then further perturbed through a delayed feedback approach from measured load deflection angles to achieve robustness. The proposed controller structure is verified by simulations and experiments.

Keywords

Unmanned aerial vehicles Non-linear control Modeling 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Abdel-Rahman, E., Nayfeh, A., Masoud, Z.: Dynamics and control of cranes: a review. J. Vib. Control. 9(7), 863–908 (2003). doi:10.1177/107754603031852 CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Amazon: Amazon.com (2016). http://www.amazon.com/b?node=8037720011
  3. 3.
    Angeli, D., Sontag, E. D.: Forward completeness, unboundedness observability, and their Lyapunov characterizations. Syst. Control Lett. 38(4), 209–217 (1999). doi:10.1016/S0167-6911(99)00055-9 MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ardupilot.com: Ardupilot - Open source autopilot (2016). http://ardupilot.com
  5. 5.
    Bernard, M., Kondak, K.: Generic slung load transportation system using small size helicopters. In: 2009 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. doi:10.1109/ROBOT.2009.5152382, pp 3258–3264 (2009)
  6. 6.
    Bernard, M., Kondak, K., Maza, I., Ollero, A.: Autonomous transportation and deployment with aerial robots for search and rescue missions. J. Field Rob. 28(6), 914–931 (2011). doi:10.1002/rob CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bisgaard, M., la Cour-Harbo, A., Bendtsen, J.: Input Shaping for Helicopter Slung Load Swing Reduction. In: AIAA Guidance, Navigation and Control Conference and Exhibit. Honolulu, Hawai (2008)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bisgaard, M., Cour-harbo, A., Bendtsen, J. D.: Swing damping for helicopter slung load systems using delayed feedback. In: Proceedings of AIAA Conference on Guidance, Navigation, and Control, pp 1–11 (2009)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cicolani, L., Kanning, G.: Equations of motion of slung-load systems, including multilift systems. NASA Office of Management Scientific and Technical Information Program Technical(3280) (1992)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Egeland, O., Gravdahl, J. T.: Modeling and simulation for automatic control. Marine Cybernetics (2002)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fossen, T., Breivik, M., Skjetne, R.: Line-of-sight path following of underactuated marine craft. In: Proceedings of the IFAC MCMC’03, pp 1–6. IFAC MCMC’03, Girona, Spain (2003)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fossen, T. I.: Marine Craft Hydrodynamics and Motion Control. Wiley (2011)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fossen, T. I., Lori̇a, A., Teel, A.: Theorem for UGAS and ULES of (passive) nonautonomous systems: robust control of mechanical systems and ships. Int. J. Robust Nonlinear Control 11(2), 95–108 (2001). doi:10.1002/rnc.551 MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Goodarzi, F. A., Lee, D., Lee, T.: Geometric stabilization of quadrotor UAV with a payload connected by flexible cable. In: American Control Conference (ACC), pp. 4925–4930. IEEE (2014)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Guerrero, M. E., Mercado, D. A., Lozano, R., Garc, C. D.: IDA-PBC methodology for a quadrotor UAV transporting a cable-suspended payload. In: International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems (ICUAS), 2015. doi:10.1109/ICUAS.2015.7152325, pp 470–476. IEEE, Denver, CO (2015)
  16. 16.
    Khalil, H. K.: Nonlinear Systems, 3rd edn. Prentice Hall (2002)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Klausen, K., Fossen, T. I., Johansen, T. A.: Nonlinear control of a multirotor UAV with suspended load. In: International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems (ICUAS), 2015. doi:10.1109/ICUAS.2015.7152289, pp 176–184. IEEE, Denver, CO (2015)
  18. 18.
    Krstic, M., Kanellakopoulos, I., Kokotovic, P.: Nonlinear and Adaptive Control Design. Wiley, New York (1995)MATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mahony, R., Kumar, V., Corke, P.: Modeling, estimation, and control of quadrotor. IEEE Robot. Autom. Mag. 19(3), 20–32 (2012). doi:10.1109/MRA.2012.2206474 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Palunko, I., Cruz, P., Fierro, R.: Agile load transportation - safe and efficient load manipulation with aerial robots. IEEE Robot. Autom. Mag., 69–79 (2012)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Palunko, I., Fierro, R., Cruz, P.: Trajectory generation for swing-free maneuvers of a quadrotor with suspended payload: a dynamic programming approach. In: 2012 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. doi:10.1109/ICRA.2012.6225213, pp 2691–2697 (2012)
  22. 22.
    Piher.net: MTS-360 (2016). http://www.piher.net/
  23. 23.
    Pinto, J., Dias, P. S., Martins, R., Fortuna, J., Marques, E., Sousa, J.: The LSTS toolchain for networked vehicle systems. OCEANS 2013 MTS/IEEE Bergen: the Challenges of the Northern Dimension. doi:10.1109/OCEANS-Bergen.2013.6608148 (2013)
  24. 24.
    Pixhawk.ethz.ch: PX4 Pixhawk (2016). https://pixhawk.ethz.ch/
  25. 25.
    Singh, T., Singhose, W.: Input shaping / time delay control of maneuvering flexible structures. In: American Control Conference, 2002. Proceedings of the 2002, pp. 1717–1731 (3). NY, USA (2002)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kristian Klausen
    • 1
  • Thor I. Fossen
    • 1
  • Tor Arne Johansen
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Engineering CyberneticsNorwegian University of Science and TechnologyTrondheimNorway

Personalised recommendations