Advertisement

Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems

, Volume 83, Issue 2, pp 165–178 | Cite as

Study and Implementation of a Cooperative Hoisting for Two Crawler Cranes

  • Yanming LiEmail author
  • Xingfei Xi
  • Jun Xie
  • Chengliang Liu
Article

Abstract

Dual-crane cooperative hoisting is necessary for heavy loads and certain equipment in petrochemical plants, but most dual-crane hoisting are carried out by two drivers commanded under one or more banksmen, thus leading to low hoisting efficiency and bad hoisting quality. Adopting cooperative manipulator technology, an automatic dual-crane cooperative hoisting system is proposed. The difference between the dual manipulator and the dual cranes are analyzed, and constraint conditions for dual-cranes cooperative hoisting are obtained. Four typical working modes are defined according to the features of cooperative hoisting of dual cranes, the corresponding cooperative equations are obtained and solved for every modes. The hardware, with which the information of different cranes and the lifted objects can be shared in real time via wireless communication, was designed, and the cooperation algorithm was implemented with the hardware. The usefulness and precision of the system was tested with the crawler cranes of SANY Company.

Keywords

Cooperative hoisting Dual cranes Cooperative manipulator Automatic hoisting 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Caccavale, F.: Cooperative manipulators. In: Bruno, S., Oussama, K. (eds.) Springer Handbook of Robotics, pp. 701–718. Springer, Berlin (2008)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Smith, C., Karayiannidis, Y., Nalpantidis, L., et al.: Dual arm manipulation—A survey. Rob. Autom. Syst. 60(10), 1340–1353 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mehrjerdi, H., Saad, M., Ghommam, J.: fuzzy cooperative control and path following for a team of mobile robots. IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatron. 16(5), 907–917 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Basile, F., Caccavale, F., Chiacchio, P., et al.: Task-oriented motion planning for multi-arm robotic systems. Rob. Comput. Integr. Manuf. 28(5), 569–582 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zi, B., Sun, H.H., Zhu, Z.C., et al.: The dynamics and sliding mode control of multiple cooperative welding robot manipulators. Int. J. Adv. Rob. Syst. 9(53), 1–10 (2012)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ali, M.S., Babu, N.R., Varghese, K.: Collision free path planning of cooperative crane manipulators using genetic algorithm. J. Comput. Civil Eng. 19(2), 182–193 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bhaskar, S.V., Babu, N.R., Varghese, K.: Spline Based Trajectory Planning for Cooperative Crane Lifts, pp. 418–423. International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction 2006 (ISARC), Tokyo (2006)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sivakumar, P.L., Varghese, K., Babu, N.R.: Automated path planning of cooperative crane lifts using heuristic search. J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 16, 197–207 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chang, Y.C., Hung, W.H., Kang, S.C.: A fast path planning method for single and dual crane erections. Autom. Constr. 22, 468–480 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Manrique, J.D., Al-Hussein, M., Telyas, A., Funston, G.: Constructing a complex precast tilt-up-panel structure utilizing an optimization model, 3D CAD, and animation. J. Construc. Eng. Manage. 133(3), 199–207 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wu, D., Liu, Y., Wang, X., Wu, X.: Simulation system of crawler crane for demonstrating hoisting proposal. J. Syst. Simul. 20(5), 1187–1191 (2008a)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tantisevi, K., Akinci, B.: Simulation-based identification of possible locations for mobile cranes on construction sites. J. Construc.Eng. Manage. 22(1), 21–30 (2008)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Li, Y., Liu, C.: Integrating field data and 3D simulation for tower crane activity monitoring and alarming. Autom. Constr. 27, 111–119 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lin, Y., Wu, D., Wang, X., et al.: A Statics-Based Simulation Approach for Two-Crane lift. J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 138, 1139–1149 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Chi, H.L., Kang, S.C.: A physics-based simulation approach for cooperative erection activities. Autom. Constr. 19, 750–761 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zi, B., Qian, S., Ding, H., et al.: Design and analysis of cooperative cable parallel manipulators for multiple mobile cranes. Int J Adv Robotic Sy 9, 207 (2012)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Leban, F.A., Diaz-Gonzalez, J., Parker, G.G., et al.: Inverse kinematic control of a dual crane system experiencing base motion. IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol. PP(99), 1,1Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Eberharter, J.K., Schneider, K.: Control for Synchronizing Multi-Crane Lifts, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Control Applications Part of 2010 IEEE Multi-Conference on Systems and Control,Yokohama, Japan (2010)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Mechanical EngineeringShanghai Jiao Tong UniversityShanghaiChina
  2. 2.Zhejiang SANY Equipment Limitted CompanyZhejiangChina

Personalised recommendations