Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems

, Volume 84, Issue 1–4, pp 241–258 | Cite as

Rolling Horizon Path Planning of an Autonomous System of UAVs for Persistent Cooperative Service: MILP Formulation and Efficient Heuristics

Article

Abstract

A networked system consisting of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), automated logistic service stations (LSSs), customer interface software, system orchestration algorithms and UAV control software can be exploited to provide persistent service to its customers. With efficient algorithms for UAV task planning, the UAVs can autonomously serve the customers in real time. Nearly uninterrupted customer service may be accomplished via the cooperative hand-off of customer tasks from weary UAVs to ones that have recently been replenished at an LSS. With the goal of enabling the autonomy of the task planning tasks, we develop a mixed integer linear programming (MILP) formulation for the problem of providing simultaneous. UAV escort service to multiple customers across a field of operations with multiple sharable LSSs. This MILP model provides a formal representation of our problem and enables use in a rolling horizon planner via allowance of arbitrary UAV initial locations and consumable reservoir status (e.g., battery level). As such, it enables automation of the orchestration of system activities. To address computational complexity, we develop efficient heuristics to rapidly derive near optimal solutions. A receding horizon task assignment (RHTA) heuristic and sequential task assignment heuristic (STAH) are developed. STAH exploits properties observed in optimal solutions obtained for small problems via CPLEX. Numerical studies suggest that RHTA and STAH are 45 and 2100 times faster than solving the MILP via CPLEX, respectively. Both heuristics perform well relative to the optimal solution obtained via CPLEX. An example demonstrating the use of the approach for rolling horizon planning is provided.

Keywords

Persistent UAV service Cooperative UAV service UAV task planning Mixed integer linear programming Heuristic 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Valenti, M., Dale, D., How, J., Vian, J.: Mission health management for 24/7 persistent surveillance operations. In: Proceedings of the AIAA Guidance, Control and Navigation Conference, Myrtle Beach, SC, August (2007)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bethke, B., Valenti, M., How, J.: UAV task assignment. IEEE Robot. Autom. Mag. 15(1), 39–44 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Nigam, N., Bieniawski, S., Kroo, I., Vian, J.: Control of multiple UAVs for persistent surveillance: algorithm flight test results. IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol. 20(5), 1236–1251 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ure, N.K., Chowdhary, G., Toksoz, T., How, J.P, Vavrina, M.A., Vian, J.: An automated battery management system to enable persistent missions with multiple aerial vehicles. IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatron. 20(1), 275–286 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kemper, P.F., Suzuki, K.A.O., Morrison, J.R.: UAV consumable replenishment: design concepts for automated service station. J. Intell. Robot. Syst. 61(1), 369–397 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Suzuki, K.A.O., Kemper, P.F., Morrison, J.R.: Automated battery replacement system for UAVs: analysis and design. J. Intell. Robot. Syst. 65(1), 563–586 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Swieringa, K.A., Hanson, C.B., Richardson, J.R., White, J.D., Hasan, Z., Qian, E., Girard, A.: Autonomous battery swapping systems for small-scale helicopters. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation(ICRA), Anchorage, Alaske, pp. 3335–3340 (2010)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Godzdanker, R., Rutherford, M.J., Valavanis, K.P.: ISLAND: a self-leveling landing platform for autonomous miniature UAVs. In: Proceedings IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics, Budapest, Hungary, pp. 170–175 (2011)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fujii, K., Higuchi, K., Pekimoto, J.: Endless flyer: a continuous flying drone with automatic battery replacement. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Ubiquitous Intelligence & Computing and IEEE International Conference on Autonomic & Trusted Computing, Sorrento Peninsula, Italy, pp. 216–223 (2013)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kim, W., Ji, K., Ambike, A.: Real-time operating environment for networked control systems. IEEE Trans. Autom. Sci. Eng. 3(3), 287–296 (2005)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Geramifard, A., Redding, J., Roy, N., How, J.P.: UAV cooperative control with stochastic risk models, pp. 3393–3398 (2011)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cocchioni, F., Pierfelice, V., Benini, A., Mancini, A., Frontoni, E., Zingaretti, P., Ippoliti, G., Longhi, S.: Unmanned ground and aerial vehicles in extended range indoor and outdoor missions (2014)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sharma, R.: Observability based control for cooperative localization. In: 2014 International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems (ICUAS), Orlando, pp. 134–139 (2014)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ponda, S.S., Johnson, L.B., Geramifard, A., How, J.P.: Cooperative mission planning for multi-UAV teams Handbook of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles, pp. 1447–1490 (2014)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Geramifard, A., Redding, J., How, J.P.: Intelligent cooperative control architecture: a framework for performance improvement using safe learning. J. Intell. Robot. Syst. 73(1), 83–103 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ure, N.K., Chowdhary, G., How, J.P., Vavrina, M.A., Vian, J.: Health aware planning under uncertainty for UAV missions with heterogeneous teams. In: Proceedings European Control Conference, Zurich, Switzerland, pp. 3312–3319 (2013)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Shima, T., Schumacher, C.: Assignment of cooperating UAVs to simultaneous tasks using genetic algorithm. In: Proceedings of the AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference and Exhibit, San Francisco (2005)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zeng, J., Yang, X., Yang, L., Shen, G.: Modeling for UAV resource scheduling under mission synchronization. J. Syst. Eng. Electron. 21(5), 821–826 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Weinstein, A.L., Schumacher, C.: UAV scheduling via the vehicle routing problem with time windows. In: Proceedings of the AIAA Infotech@Aerospace 2007 Conference and Exhibit, Rohnert Park, California (2007)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kim, Y.S., Gu, D.W., Postlethwaite, I.: Real-time optimal mission scheduling and flight path selection. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 52(6), 1119–1123 (2007)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Alidaee, B., Wang, H., Landram, F.: A note on integer programming formulations of the real-time optimal scheduling and flight selection of UAVS. IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol. 17(4), 839–843 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Shetty, V.K., Sudit, M., Nagi, R.: Priority-based assignment and routing of a fleet of unmanned combat aerial vehicles. Comput. Oper. Res. 35(6), 1813–1828 (2008)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kim, J., Song, B.D., Morrison, J.R.: On the scheduling of systems of heterogeneous UAVs and fuel service stations for long-term mission fulfillment. J. Intell. Robot. Syst. 70(1), 347–359 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Song, B.D., Kim, J., Kim, J., Park, H., Morrison, J.R., Shim, D.H.: Persistent UAV service: an improved scheduling formulation and prototypes of system components. J. Intell. Robot. Syst. 74(1), 221–232 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kim, J., Morrison, J.R.: On the concerted design and scheduling of multiple resources for persistent UAV operations. J. Intell. Robot. Syst. 74(1), 479–498 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kim, J., Shim, D.H., Morrison, J.R.: Tablet PC-based visual target-following system for quadrotors. J. Intell. Robot. Syst. 74(1), 85–95 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Sundar, K., Rathinam, S.: Algorithms for routing an unmanned aerial vehicle in the presence of refeuling depots. IEEE Trans. Autom. Sci. Eng. 11(1), 287–294 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Song, B.D., Kim, J., Morrison, J.R.: Towards real time scheduling for persistent UAV service: A rolling horizon MILP approach, RHTA and the STAH heuristic, pp. 505–516 (2014)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Toth, P., Vigo, D.: Models, relaxations and exact approaches for the capacitated vehicle routing problem. Discret. Appl. Math. 123(1–3), 487–512 (2002)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Longo, H., Aragao, M.P., Uchoa, E.: Solving capacitated arc routing problems using a transformation to the CVRP. Comput. Oper. Res. 33(6), 1823–1837 (2006)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ralphs, T.K., Kopman, L., Pulleyblank, W.R., Trotter, L.E.: On the capacitated vehicle routing problem. Math. Program. 94(2–3), 343–359 (2003)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Ho, W., Ho, G.T.S., Ping, J., Lau, H.C.W.: A hybrid genetic algorithm for the multi-depot vehicle routing problem. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 21(4), 548–557 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Byung Duk Song
    • 1
  • Jonghoe Kim
    • 1
  • James R. Morrison
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Industrial and Systems EngineeringKAISTDaejeonSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations