Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems

, Volume 75, Issue 3–4, pp 625–640 | Cite as

Response Threshold Model Based UAV Search Planning and Task Allocation

Article

Abstract

This paper addresses a search planning and task allocation problem for a Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) team that performs a search and destroy mission in an environment where targets with different values move around. The UAVs are heterogeneous having different sensing and attack capabilities, and carry limited amount of munitions. The objective of the mission is to find targets and eliminate them as quickly as possible considering the values of the targets. In this context, there are two distinct issues that need to be addressed simultaneously: search planning and task allocation. The search plan generates an efficient search path for each UAV to facilitate a fast target detection. The task allocation assigns UAVs attack tasks over detected targets such that each UAV’s attack capability is respected. We model these two issues in one framework and propose a distributed approach that utilizes a probabilistic decision making mechanism based on response threshold model. The proposed approach accounts for natural uncertainties in the environment, and provides flexibility, resulting in efficient exploration in the environment and effective allocation of attack tasks. The approach is evaluated in simulation experiments in comparison with other methods, of which results show that our approach outperforms the other methods.

Keywords

Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Search planning Task allocation Probabilistic decision making Response threshold model 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Unmanned Aircraft Systems Roadmap 2005–2030. Office of Secretary of Defense (2005)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Jin, Y., Liao, Y., Minai, A., Polycarpou, M.: Balancing search and target response in cooperative Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) team. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. B Cybern. 36, 571–587 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Campos, M., Bonabeau, E., Theraulaz, G., Deneubourg, J.-L.: Dynamic scheduling and division of labor in social insects. Adapt. Behav. 8, 83–92 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Nouyan, S., Ghizzioli, R., Birattari, M., Dorigo, M.: An insect-based algorithm for the dynamic task allocation problem. Künstlich Intell. 4, 25–31 (2005)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Benkoski, S., Monticino, M., Weisinger, J.: A survey of the search theory literature. Nav. Res. Logist. 38, 469–494 (1991)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Stone D.: Theory of Optimal Search, 2nd edn. Operation Research Society of America, Arlington (1989)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Washburn, A.: On a search for a moving target. Nav. Res. Logist. 27, 315–322 (1980)MATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Brown, S.: Optimal search for a moving target in discrete time and space. Oper. Res. 28, 1275–1289 (1980)MATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Stewart, T.: Search for a moving target when searcher motion is restricted. Comput. Oper. Res. 6, 129–140 (1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Washburn, A.: Search for a moving target: the FAB algorithm. Oper. Res. 31, 739–751 (1983)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Grundel, D.: Searching for a moving target: optimal path panning. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Networking, Sensing, and Control, pp. 867–872. Los Alamitos, CA (2005)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Polycarpou, M., Yang, Y., Passino, K.: A cooperative search framework for distributed agents. In: Proceedings of the 2001 IEEE International Symposium on Intelligent Control, pp. 1–6. Mexico City, Mexico (2001)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sujit, P., Ghose, D.: Search using multiple UAVs with flight time constraints. IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst. 40, 491–508 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Yang, Y., Minai, A., Polycarpou, M.: Evidential map-building approaches for multi-UAV cooperative search. In: Proceedings of American Control Conference, pp. 116–121. Portland, OR (2005)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jin, Y., Minai, A., Polycarpou, M.: Cooperative real-time search and task allocation in UAV teams. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Decision and Control, pp. 7–12. Maui, Hawaii (2003)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Flint, M., Fernandez-Gaucherand, E., Polycarpou, M.: Cooperative control for UAV’s searching risky environments for targets. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Decision and Control, pp. 3567–3572. Maui, Hawaii (2003)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Yang, Y., Minai, A., Polycarpou, M.: Decentralized cooperative search by networked UAVs in an uncertain environment. In: Proceedings of American Control Conference, pp. 5558–5563. Boston, Massachusetts (2004)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Flint, M., Polycarpou, M., Fernandez-Gaucherand, E.: Cooperative control for multiple autonomous UAV’s searching for targets. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Decision and Control, pp. 2823–2828. Las Vegas, Nevada (2002)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sujit, P., Sinha, A., Ghose, D.: Team, game, and negotiation based intelligent autonomous UAV task allocation for wide area application. In: Chahl, J. S., Jain, L. C., Mizutani, A., Sato-Ilic, M. (eds.) Innovations in Intelligent Machines (1), pp. 39–75. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Passino, K., Polycarpou, M., Jacques, D., Pachter, M., Liu, Y., Yang, Y., Flint, M., Barum, M.: Cooperative control for autonomous air vehicles. In: Cooperative Control and Optimization. Kluwer, Boston (2002)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Vincent, P., Rubin, I.: A framework and analysis for cooperative search using UAV swarms. In: Proceedings of the 19th Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, pp. 79–86. Nicosia, Cyprus (2004)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Jun, M., D’Andrea, R.: Probability map building of uncertain dynamic environments with indistinguishable obstacles. In: Proceedings of American Control Conference, pp. 3417–3422. Denver, Colorado (2003)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bertuccelli, L., How, J.: Search for dynamic targets with uncertain probability map. In: Proceedings of American Control Conference, pp. 737–742. Minneapolis, Minnesota (2006)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Shumacher, C., Chandler, P., Pachter, M., Pachter, L.: UAV task assignment with timing constraints via mixed-integer linear programming. In: Proceedings of AIAA 3rd the Unmanned Unlimited Systems Conference, pp. 232–252. Chicago, Illinois (2004)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Nygard, K., Chandler, P., Pachter, M.: Dynamic network flow optimization models for air vehicle resource allocation. In: Proceedings of the American Control Conference, pp. 1853–1858. Arlington, Texas (2001)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Shima, T., Rasmussen, S., Sparks, A., Passino, K.: Multiple task assignments for cooperating uninhabited aerial vehicles using genetic algorithms. Comput. Oper. Res. 33, 3252–3269 (2006)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Arslan, G., Wolfe, J., Shamma, J. Speyer, J.: Optimal planning for autonomous air vehicle battle management. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, pp. 3782–3787. Las Vegas, Nevada (2002)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Shetty, V., Sudit, M., Nagi, R.: Priority-based assignment and routing of a fleet of unmanned combat aerial vehicles. Comput. Oper. Res. 35, 1813–1828 (2008)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Lemaire, T., Alami, R., Lacroix, S.: A distributed task allocation scheme in multi-UAV context. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 1157–1162. New Orleans, Louisiana (2004)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Gurfil, P.: Evaluating UAV flock mission performance using Dudek’s taxonomy. In: Proceedings of the American Control Conference, pp. 4679–4684. Portland, Oregon (2005)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Sujit, P., Sinha, A., Ghose, D.: Multiple UAV task allocation using negotiation. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, pp. 471–478. Hakodate, Hokkaido, Japan (2006)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Sujit, P., Beard, R.: Distributed sequential auctions for multiple UAV task allocation. In: Proceedings of the American Control Conference, pp. 3955–3960. New York City, New York (2007)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Army Analysis and SimulationRepublic of Korea ArmyChungnam-doSouth Korea
  2. 2.School of Aeronautics and AstronauticsPurdue UniversityWest LafayetteUSA
  3. 3.School of Industrial EngineeringPurdue UniversityWest LafayetteUSA

Personalised recommendations