Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems

, Volume 65, Issue 1–4, pp 621–635 | Cite as

A Data Fusion System for Attitude Estimation of Low-cost Miniature UAVs

Article

Abstract

Miniature unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) have attracted wide interest from researchers and developers because of their broad applications. In order to make a miniature UAV platform popular for civilian applications, one critical concern is the overall cost. However, lower cost generally means lower navigational accuracy and insufficient flight control performance, mainly due to the low graded avionics on the UAV. This paper introduces a data fusion system based on several low-priced sensors to improve the attitude estimation of a low-cost miniature fixed-wing UAV platform. The characteristics of each sensor and the calculation of attitude angles are carefully studied. The algorithms and implementation of the fusion system are described and explained in details. Ground test results with three sensor fusions are compared and analyzed, and flight test comparison results with two sensor fusions are also presented.

Keywords

Data fusion Multi-sensor fusion UAV navigation Inertia measurement Estimation  Parley 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    AggieAir: towards low-cost cooperative multispectral remote sensing using small unmanned aircraft systems, Haiyang Chao, Austin Jensen, Yiding Han, YangQuan Chen, and Mac McKee. In: Jedlovec, G. (ed.) Advances in Geoscience and Remote Sensing, pp. 463–490. Vukovar, Croatia: ISBN: 978-953-307-005-6, IN-TECH (2009)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Beard, R., Kingston, D., Quigley, M., Snyder, D., Christiansen, R., Johnson, W., Mclain, T., Goodrich, M.: Autonomous vehicle technologies for small fixed-wing UAVs. AIAA J. Aerosp. Comput. Inf. Commun. 5, 92–108 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Di, L., Chao, H., Chen, Y.Q.: A Two-stage calibration method for low-cost UAV attitude estimation using infrared sensor. In: Proceedings of 2010 IEEE/ASME International Conference on Mechatronic and Embedded Systems and Applications, Qingdao, ShanDong, China, 15–17 July (2010)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Munoz, J., Premerlani, B.: AuduIMU open source project. http://diydrones.com/profiles/blogs/arduimu-v2-demo-video (2009)
  5. 5.
    Chao, H., Coopmans, C., Di, L., Chen, Y.Q.: A comparative evaluation of low-cost IMUs for unmanned autonomous systems. In: IEEE 2010 International Conference on Multisensor Fusion and Integration for Intelligent Systems, Fort Douglas, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, 5–7 September (2010)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Centeye—Visual Microsensor Technology: http://www.centeye.com/
  7. 7.
    Chao, H., Cao, Y., Chen, Y.Q.: Autopilots for small unmanned aerial vehicles: a survey. Int. J. Control. Autom. Syst. 8(1), 36–44 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Oh, S.M., Tariq, S., Walker, B., Dellaert, F.: Map-based priors for localization. In: IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), pp. 2179–2184. Sendai, Japan (2004)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Egan, G., Taylor, B.: The use of infrared sensors for absolute attitude determination of unmanned aerial vehicles. Tech. Rep. MECSE-22-2006, Monash University, Australia (2006)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Brisset, P., Drouin, A., Gorraz, M, Huard, P.S., Tyler, J.: The paparazzi solution. In: Proc. of MAV. Sandestin, Florida (2006)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Euston, M., Coote, P., Mahony, R., Kim, J., Hamel, T.: A complementary filter for attitude estimation of a fixed-wing UAV. In: Proc. IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf., IROS, pp. 340–345 (2008)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Premerlani, W., Bizard, P.: Direction cosine matrix IMU: theory. http://gentlenav.googlecode.com/files/DCMDraft2.pdf
  13. 13.
    Dusha, D., Boles, W., Walker, R.: Attitude estimation for a fixed-wing air craft using horizon detection and optical flow. In: Proceedings of the 9th Biennial Conference of the Australian Pattern Recognition Society on Digital Image Computing Techniques and Applications, pp. 485–492 (2007)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ettinger, S., Nechyba, M., Ifju, P., Waszak, M.: Towards flight autonomy: vision-based horizon detection for micro air vehicles. In: Proceedings of the 2002 Florida Conference on Recent Advances in Robotics, vol. 2002 (2002)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Fefilatyev, S., Smarodzinava, V., Hall, L., Goldgof, D.: Horizon detection using machine learning techniques. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications (ICMLA), pp. 17–21 (2006)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    McGee, T., Sengupta, R., Hedrick, K.: Obstacle detection for small autonomous aircraft using sky segmentation. In: Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp. 4679–4684 (2006)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Todorovic, S., Nechyba, M.: Sky/ground modeling for autonomous mav flight. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), vol. 1, pp. 1422–1427 (2003)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Fromm, T., Di, L., Voos, H., Chen, Y.Q.: Visual attitude estimation for low-cost personal remote sensing systems. In: Proceedings of 2011 ASME/IEEE International Conference on Mechatronic and Embedded Systems and Applications (MESA 2011), Washington DC, USA, 28–31 August 2011 (accepted)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Swaszek, P.F., Willett, P.: Parley as an approach to distributed detection. IEEE T. Aero. Elec. Syst. 31, 447–457 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Fleming, A.J., Wills, A.G., Moheimani, S.O.R.: Sensor fusion for improved control of piezoelectric tube scanners. IEEE T. Contr. Syst. T. 15(6), 1265–6536 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
  22. 22.
  23. 23.
  24. 24.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Self-Organizing and Intelligent Systems (CSOIS), Department of Electrical and Computer EngineeringUtah State UniversityLoganUSA

Personalised recommendations