A model for assessment of the impact of configuration changes in complex products

  • Yu-jie ZhengEmail author
  • Yu Yang
  • Na Zhang


An assessment of the impact of configuration changes in complex products is significant for improving the accuracy of change decision-making. Most related studies lack objectivity, systematicness and applicability. For this reason, a four-phase model for the assessment of this impact is proposed. In Phase I, a network model for parameter relationships of complex products is built to accurately express the complex product structures. In Phase II, an assessment method for the change propagation probability based on the gray comprehensive relation analysis and an assessment method for the propagation impact probability via the analysis of configuration change values are proposed to compute the two probabilities objectively. In Phase III, the change propagation method is introduced to precisely assess the impact of the configuration changes between two parameters. In Phase IV, a method for assessing the overall impact of configuration changes via the division of the parameters into stages is put forward to systematically assess the impact of configuration changes on the whole complex products. The methods in the four-phase model are easy to program and could further improve the assessment efficiency. Besides, a practical application of the proposed assessment model is suggested to verify the validity and applicability of this research.


Complex products The impact of configuration changes Configuration change propagation Propagation impact 



This study was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (71571023) and a project supported by Graduate Research and Innovation Foundation of Chongqing, China (Grant No. CYB17024).


  1. Akgün, A. E., Keskin, H., & Byrne, J. C. (2014). Complex adaptive systems theory and firm product innovativeness. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 31(1), 21–42.Google Scholar
  2. Ayhan, M. B., Aydin, M. E., & Öztemel, E. (2015). A multi-agent based approach for change management in manufacturing enterprises. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 26(5), 975–988.Google Scholar
  3. Cheng, H., & Chu, X. (2012). A network-based assessment approach for change impacts on complex product. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 23(4), 1419–1431.Google Scholar
  4. Chua, D. K. H., & Hossain, M. A. (2012). Predicting change propagation and impact on design schedule due to external changes. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 59(3), 483–493.Google Scholar
  5. Clarkson, P. J., Simons, C., & Eckert, C. (2004). Predicting change propagation in complex design. Journal of Mechanical Design, 126(5), 788–797.Google Scholar
  6. Cohen, T., Navathe, S. B., & Fulton, R. E. (2000). C-FAR, change favorable representation. Computer-Aided Design, 32(5), 321–338.Google Scholar
  7. Cui, L. Z., Liu, S. F., Li, Z. P., & Cui, J. (2010). A new gray similarity degree model and its application. Statistics and Decision, 7, 7–9.Google Scholar
  8. Deng, J. L. (1982). Control problems of grey systems. Systems & Control Letters, 1(5), 288–294.Google Scholar
  9. Diagne, S., Coulibaly, A., & DeBeuvron, F. D. B. (2016). Complex product modeling based on a multi-solution extended conceptual design semantic matrix for behavioral performance assessment. Computers in Industry, 75(C), 101–115.Google Scholar
  10. Duan, G. J., & Wang, Y. (2013). Qcs-linkage model based quality problem processing framework: A chinese experience in complex product development. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 26(2), 239–254.Google Scholar
  11. Eckert, C. M., Clarkson, P. J., & Zanker, W. (2004). Change and customisation in complex engineering domains. Research in Engineering Design, 15(1), 1–21.Google Scholar
  12. Eckert, C. M., Keller, R., Earl, C., & Clarkson, P. J. (2006). Supporting change processes in design: Complexity, prediction and reliability. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 91(12), 1521–1534.Google Scholar
  13. Eisa, H., Garstenauer, A., & Blackburn, T. (2018). Causes of engineering change propagation: An analysis during product lifecycle. Engineering Management Journal EMJ, 30(1), 3–13.Google Scholar
  14. Flanagan, T. L., Eckert, C. M., & Clarkson, P. J. (2003). Parameter trails. Paper presented at the 14th international conference on engineering design, Stockholm, Sweden.Google Scholar
  15. Garina, E. P., Garin, A. P., Kuznetsov, V. P., Popkova, E. G., & Potashnik, Y. S. (2018). Comparison of approaches to development of industrial production in the context of the development of a complex product. In E. Popkova (Ed.), HOSMC: The impact of information on modern humans (Vol. 622, pp. 422–431). Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
  16. Guo, Y. M., Wang, J., & Ling, W. Q. (2011). Study on complex product design change propagation based on small world net model. Manufacturing Automation, 33(1), 85–90.Google Scholar
  17. Han, X., Li, R., Wang, J., Qin, S., & Ding, G. (2017). Identification of key design characteristics for complex product adaptive design. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 95(1–4), 1215–1231.Google Scholar
  18. Jarratt, T. A. W., Eckert, C. M., Caldwell, N. H. M., & Clarkson, P. J. (2011). Engineering change: An overview and perspective on the literature. Research in Engineering Design, 22(2), 103–124.Google Scholar
  19. Jarratt, T. A. W., Eckert, C. M., Clarkson, P. J., & Schwankl, L. (2002). Product architecture and the propagation of engineering change. Paper presented at the 7th international design conference (design 2002), Dubrovnik, Croatia.Google Scholar
  20. Keller, R., Eckert, C., & Clarkson, P. J. (2005). Multiple views to support engineering change management for complex products. In J. C. Roberts (Ed.), Third international conference on coordinated and multiple views in exploratory visualization (CMV 2005). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society.Google Scholar
  21. Koh, E. C. Y., Caldwell, N. H. M., & Clarkson, P. J. (2012). A method to assess the effects of engineering change propagation. Research in Engineering Design, 23(4), 329–351.Google Scholar
  22. Kuo, Y., Yang, T., & Huang, G. W. (2008). The use of grey relational analysis in solving multiple attribute decision-making problems. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 55(1), 80–93.Google Scholar
  23. Lee, H., Seol, H., Sung, N., Hong, Y. S., & Park, Y. (2010). An analytic network process approach to measuring design change impacts in modular products. Journal of Engineering Design, 21(1), 75–91.Google Scholar
  24. Li, B., Chen, L., Huang, Z., & Zhong, Y. (2006). Product configuration optimization using a multiobjective genetic algorithm. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 30(1), 20–29.Google Scholar
  25. Li, H., Mi, S., Li, Q., Wen, X., Qiao, D., & Luo, G. (2018). A scheduling optimization method for maintenance, repair and operations service resources of complex products. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing. Scholar
  26. Li, N., Li, X., Shen, Y., Bi, Z., & Sun, M. (2015). Risk assessment model based on multi-agent systems for complex product design. Information Systems Frontiers, 17(2), 363–385.Google Scholar
  27. Liu, C., & Arunkumar, N. (2018). Risk prediction and assessment of transnational transmission of financial crisis based on complex network. Cluster Computing. Scholar
  28. Liu, Y., & Liu, Z. (2010). An integration method for reliability analyses and product configuration. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 50(5), 831–841.Google Scholar
  29. Ollinger, G. A., & Stahovich, T. F. (2004). RedesignIT—A model-based tool for managing design changes. Journal of Mechanical Design, 126(2), 208–216.Google Scholar
  30. Rapeti, P., Pasam, V. K., Gurram, K. M. R., & Revuru, R. S. (2018). Performance assessment of vegetable oil based nano cutting fluids in machining using grey relational analysis—A step towards sustainable manufacturing. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 2862–2875.Google Scholar
  31. Rivera Torres, P. J., Serrano Mercado, E. I., & Anido Rifón, L. (2017). Probabilistic boolean network modeling and model checking as an approach for DFMEA for manufacturing systems. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing. Scholar
  32. Rouibah, K., & Caskey, K. R. (2003). Change management in concurrent engineering from a parameter perspective. Computers in Industry, 50(1), 15–34.Google Scholar
  33. Rutka, A., Guenov, M. D., Lemmens, Y., Schmidt-Schäffer, T., Coleman, P., & Riviere, A. (2006). Methods for engineering change propagation analysis. Paper presented at the congress of international council of the aeronautical sciences, Hamburg, Germany.Google Scholar
  34. Shi, H. X., Liu, S. F., Fang, G. Z., & Zhang, N. (2008). The model of grey periodic incidence and their rehabilitation. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 16(3), 131–136.Google Scholar
  35. Tang, D. B., Xu, R. H., Tang, J. C., & He, R. (2010). Analysis of engineering change impacts based on design structure matrix. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 46(01), 154–161.Google Scholar
  36. Tavčar, J., Demšar, I., & Duhovnik, J. (2018). Engineering change management maturity assessment model with lean criteria for automotive supply chain. Journal of Engineering Design, 29(4–5), 235–257.Google Scholar
  37. Wang, Y., & Duan, G. J. (2014). Product characteristic relationship modeling oriented to quality characteristic variation propagation analysis. Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 20(3), 652–660.Google Scholar
  38. Wang, J. K., & Wei, F. J. (2006). Analysis and assessment of the impacts on engineering change. Industrial Engineering, 9(3), 32–35.Google Scholar
  39. Wells, L. J., Megahed, F. M., Camelio, J. A., & Woodall, W. H. (2012). A framework for variation visualization and understanding in complex manufacturing systems. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 23(5), 2025–2036.Google Scholar
  40. Wu, D., Zhen, X., Fan, X., Hu, Y., & Zhu, H. (2012). A virtual environment for complex products collaborative assembly operation simulation. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 23(3), 821–833.Google Scholar
  41. Wu, H. (2002). A comparative study of using grey relational analysis in multiple attribute decision making problems. Quality Engineering, 15(2), 209–217.Google Scholar
  42. Yang, F., & Duan, G. J. (2011). Developing a parameter linkage-based method for searching change propagation paths. Research in Engineering Design, 23(4), 353–372. Scholar
  43. Yang, F., Tang, X., & Duan, G. (2011). Searching model of change propagation paths for mechanical product based on characteristic linkage network. Journal of Engineering Design, 47(19), 97–106.Google Scholar
  44. Yu, B. L. (2015). Study on credit risk of enterprise group based on grey comprehensive relational analysis. University of Electronic Science and Technology of China.Google Scholar
  45. Zhai, L. Y., Khoo, L. P., & Zhong, Z. W. (2009). Design concept assessment in product development using rough sets and grey relation analysis. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(3), 7072–7079.Google Scholar
  46. Zhang, J., Wu, D., & Olson, D. L. (2005). The method of grey related analysis to multiple attribute decision making problems with interval numbers. Mathematical & Computer Modelling An International Journal, 42(9), 991–998.Google Scholar
  47. Zheng, Y. J., Yang, Y., Su, J. F., Zhang, N., & Jiao, Y. (2017). Dynamic optimization method for configuration change in complex product design. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 92(9–12), 4323–4336.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Industrial EngineeringShandong University of Science and TechnologyShandongChina
  2. 2.Department of Industrial EngineeringChongqing UniversityChongqingChina

Personalised recommendations