Advertisement

Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing

, Volume 30, Issue 2, pp 623–639 | Cite as

Identification of to-be-improved components for redesign of complex products and systems based on fuzzy QFD and FMEA

  • Hongzhan Ma
  • Xuening ChuEmail author
  • Deyi XueEmail author
  • Dongping Chen
Article

Abstract

Since the activities to design complex products and systems (CoPSs) mainly focus on redesign of the existing CoPSs to satisfy customer requirements and improve product reliability, identification of the to-be-improved components plays a key role in the redesign process. In the existing methods to identify the to-be-improved components, customer requirements are primarily considered while the failure knowledge, a critical information to improve product reliability, is often ignored. The objective of this research is to identify the to-be-improved components considering both customer requirements and product reliability. The customer requirements are used in redesign through quality function deployment, while the reliability is used in redesign through failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA). Different from the traditional FMEA, the failure causality relationships between and within components are analyzed in this work to provide a means of making use of failure information more effectively for constructing a directed failure causality relationship network. In this network, the failure modes of all components are modeled as vertices, and the causality relationships between failure modes are modeled as directed edges. A new index is introduced to calculate the importance of component from the viewpoint of reliability through integrating the internal and external failure effects. Fuzzy permanent function is developed to measure the internal failure effects, while the external failure effect index is developed to measure the external failure effects. A case study for identification of the to-be-improved components for the operation device of a crawler crane is implemented to demonstrate the effectiveness of the developed approach.

Keywords

Identification of to-be-improved components QFD Fuzzy FMEA Directed failure causality relationship network Fuzzy permanent function 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This project is supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 51475290, 51075261), Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China (No. 20120073110096), and Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada (Grant No. 185788).

References

  1. Almannai, B., Greenough, R., & Kay, J. (2008). A decision support tool based on QFD and FMEA for the selection of manufacturing automation technologies. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 24(4), 501–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bovea, M. D., & Wang, B. (2007). Redesign methodology for developing environmentally conscious products. International Journal of Production Research, 45(18–19), 4057–4072.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chan, L. K., & Wu, M. L. (2002). Quality function deployment: A literature review. European Journal of Operational Research, 143(3), 463–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chang, K. H., Chang, Y. C., & Lai, P. T. (2014). Applying the concept of exponential approach to enhance the assessment capability of FMEA. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 25(6), 1413–1427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chang, K. H., & Cheng, C. H. (2011). Evaluating the risk of failure using the fuzzy OWA and DEMATEL method. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 22(2), 113–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen, S. H. (2016). Determining the service demands of an aging population by integrating QFD and FMEA method. Quality & Quantity, 50(1), 283–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chen, L. H., & Ko, W. C. (2009). Fuzzy linear programming models for new product design using QFD with FMEA. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 33(2), 633–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chen, L., Macwan, A., & Li, S. (2007). Model-based rapid redesign using decomposition patterns. Journal of Mechanical Design, 129(3), 283–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chin, K. S., Chan, A., & Yang, J. B. (2008). Development of a fuzzy FMEA based product design system. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 36(7–8), 633–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Jangra, K., Grover, S., Chan, F. T., & Aggarwal, A. (2011). Digraph and matrix method to evaluate the machinability of tungsten carbide composite with wire EDM. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 56(9–12), 959–974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jia, W., Liu, Z., Lin, Z., Qiu, C., & Tan, J. (2016). Quantification for the importance degree of engineering characteristics with a multi-level hierarchical structure in QFD. International Journal of Production Research, 54(6), 1627–1649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jurkat, W. B., & Ryser, H. J. (1966). Matrix factorizations of determinants and permanents. Journal of Algebra, 3(1), 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kaufman, A., & Gupta, M. M. (1991). Introduction to fuzzy arithmetic. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold Company.Google Scholar
  14. Koomsap, P. (2013). Design by customer: Concept and applications. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 24(2), 295–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kwapień, J., & Drożdż, S. (2012). Physical approach to complex systems. Physics Reports, 515(3), 115–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Li, Z. S., Kou, F. H., Cheng, X. C., & Wang, T. (2006). Model-based product redesign. International Journal of Computer Science and Security, 6(1A), 100.Google Scholar
  17. Liu, H. C., Chen, Y. Z., You, J. X., & Li, H. (2016a). Risk evaluation in failure mode and effects analysis using fuzzy digraph and matrix approach. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 27(4), 805–816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Liu, S. F., Cheng, J. H., Lee, Y. L., & Gau, F. R. (2016b). A case study on FMEA-based quality improvement of packaging designs in the TFT-LCD industry. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 27(3–4), 413–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Liu, C., Ramirez-Serrano, A., & Yin, G. (2011). Customer-driven product design and evaluation method for collaborative design environments. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 22(5), 751–764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Liu, C., Ramirez-Serrano, A., & Yin, G. (2012). An optimum design selection approach for product customization development. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 23(4), 1433–1443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Liu, H. T., & Tsai, Y. L. (2012). A fuzzy risk assessment approach for occupational hazards in the construction industry. Safety Science, 50(4), 1067–1078.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Nataraj, M., Arunachalam, V. P., & Ranganathan, G. (2006). Using risk analysis and Taguchi’s method to find optimal conditions of design parameters: a case study. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 27(5–6), 445–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Parameshwaran, R., Baskar, C., & Karthik, T. (2015). An integrated framework for mechatronics based product development in a fuzzy environment. Applied Soft Computing, 27, 376–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Puglieri, F. N., & Ometto, A. R. (2011). Environmental and operational analysis of ecodesign methods based on QFD and FMEA. In Glocalized solutions for sustainability in manufacturing (pp. 142–147). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.Google Scholar
  25. Rao, R. V. (2006). A material selection model using graph theory and matrix approach. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 431(1), 248–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rao, R. V., & Gandhi, O. P. (2002). Failure cause analysis of machine tools using digraph and matrix methods. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 42(4), 521–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Safari, H., Faraji, Z., & Majidian, S. (2016). Identifying and evaluating enterprise architecture risks using FMEA and fuzzy VIKOR. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 27(2), 475–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Schutz, J., Rezg, N., & Léger, J. B. (2013). An integrated strategy for efficient business plan and maintenance plan for systems with a dynamic failure distribution. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 24(1), 87–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Shin, J. S., & Kim, K. J. (2000). Complexity reduction of a design problem in QFD using decomposition. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 11(4), 339–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Shin, J. H., Kiritsis, D., & Xirouchakis, P. (2015). Design modification supporting method based on product usage data in closed-loop PLM. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 28(6), 551–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Smith, S., Smith, G. C., & Chen, Y. R. (2013). A KE-LSA approach for user-centered design. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 24(5), 919–933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Smith, S., Smith, G., & Shen, Y. T. (2012). Redesign for product innovation. Design Studies, 33(2), 160–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Teoh, P. C., & Case, K. (2005). An evaluation of failure modes and effects analysis generation method for conceptual design. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 18(4), 279–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Venkatasamy, R., & Agrawal, V. P. (1997). A digraph approach to quality evaluation of an automotive vehicle. Quality Engineering, 9(3), 405–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Vinodh, S., Aravindraj, S., Narayanan, R. S., & Yogeshwaran, N. (2012). Fuzzy assessment of FMEA for rotary switches: a case study. The TQM Journal, 24(5), 461–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wang, Y. M., Chin, K. S., Poon, G. K. K., & Yang, J. B. (2009). Risk evaluation in failure mode and effects analysis using fuzzy weighted geometric mean. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(2), 1195–1207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wang, Y., Deng, C., Wu, J., Wang, Y., & Xiong, Y. (2014). A corrective maintenance scheme for engineering equipment. Engineering Failure Analysis, 36, 269–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Yan, H. B., & Ma, T. (2015). A group decision-making approach to uncertain quality function deployment based on fuzzy preference relation and fuzzy majority. European Journal of Operational Research, 241(3), 815–829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Yang, Q., Yu, S., & Sekhari, A. (2011). A modular eco-design method for life cycle engineering based on redesign risk control. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 56(9–12), 1215–1233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Zhang, Z., & Chu, X. (2010). A new approach for conceptual design of product and maintenance. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 23(7), 603–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Zhang, Z., & Chu, X. (2011). Risk prioritization in failure mode and effects analysis under uncertainty. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(1), 206–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Mechanical EngineeringShanghai Jiao Tong UniversityShanghaiChina
  2. 2.Departments of Mechanical and Manufacturing EngineeringUniversity of CalgaryCalgaryCanada
  3. 3.AVIC Commercial Aircraft Engine Co. LtdShanghaiChina

Personalised recommendations