Advertisement

Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing

, Volume 30, Issue 2, pp 575–587 | Cite as

Assessing the cost structure of component reuse in a product family for remanufacturing

  • Wenyuan Wang
  • Daniel Y. MoEmail author
  • Yue Wang
  • Mitchell M. Tseng
Article

Abstract

Component reuse is a crucial remanufacturing strategy that assists manufacturers to achieve sustainable supply chain management. However, few manufacturers obtain economic benefits from component reuse strategies due to the demand for increasing product variety and its related complex cost structure. In this paper, we propose an integrated quantitative decision model to assess the economic aspects of component reuse for remanufacturing management. Given numerous cost factors, such as component manufacturing, reverse logistics, reprocessing, disposal and penalty costs, we derive the optimal acquisition cost to retrieve end-of-life products for component reuse. Then, we identify the component commonality effects to quantify the component reuse rate from a variety of end-of-life products. Finally, our models and results are demonstrated through an industrial case study. Accordingly, the cost savings from reusing components could be achieved by 25 % of the manufacturing cost offered to acquire the used products from customers at a low reverse logistics cost. Based on the 80 % yield rate observed in the case study, the commonality of components in a product family would affect 35 % of the total cost savings of component reuse for remanufacturing.

Keywords

Remanufacturing Product design Component reuse Decision cost model 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the anonymous reviewers and the editors for their constructive comments in the earlier version of this manuscript comments, and thank the Research Grants Council of Hong Kong.

References

  1. Agrawal, N., & Cohen, M. (2001). Optimal material control in an assembly system with component commonality. Naval Research Logistics, 48(5), 409–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aras, N., & Aksen, D. (2008). Locating collection centers for distance and incentive-dependent returns. International Journal of Production Economics, 111(2), 316–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Asif, F. M. A., Bianchi, C., Rashid, A., & Nicolescu, C. M. (2012). Performance analysis of the closed loop supply chain. Journal of Remanufacturing, 2012(2), 4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ayres, R., Ferrer, G., & Van Leynsseele, T. (1997). Eco-efficiency, asset recovery and remanufacturing. European Management Journal, 15(5), 557–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bakal, I., & Akcali, E. (2006). Effects of random yield in remanufacturing with price-sensitive supply and demand. Production and Operations Management, 15(3), 407–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baker, K., Magazine, M., & Nuttle, H. (1986). The effect of commonality on safety stock in a simple inventory model. Management Science, 32(8), 982–988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barton, J. A., Love, D. M., & Taylor, G. D. (2001). Design determines 70 % of cost? A review of implications for design evaluation. Journal of Engineering Design, 12(1), 47–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bernstein, F., Kök, A. G., & Xie, L. (2011). The role of component commonality in product assortment decisions. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 13(2), 261–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Boothroyd, G., & Alting, L. (1992). Design for assembly and disassembly. CIRP Annals-Manufacturing Technology, 41(2), 625–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brun, A., Capra, E., & Miragliotta, G. (2009). VRP revisited: The impact of behavioral costs in balancing standardization and variety. International Journal of Production Economics, 117, 16–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chen, J. M., & Chang, C. (2012). The co-opetitive strategy of a closed-loop supply chain with remanufacturing. Transportation Research Part E, 48(2), 387–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chen, J. M., & Chang, C. I. (2013). Dynamic pricing for new and remanufactured products in a closed-loop supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 146(1), 153–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chen, M., & Zhang, F. (2009). End-of-life vehicle recovery in China: Consideration and innovation following the EU ELV directive. JOM Journal of the Minerals, Metals and Materials Society, 61(3), 45–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. De Brito, M., & Dekker, R. (2004). A framework for reverse logistics. In R. Dekker, M. Fleischmann, K. Inderfurth, & L. N. Van Wassenhove (Eds.), Reverse logistics: Quantitative models for closed-loop supply chains (pp. 3–27). Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Demirel, N., & Gokcen, H. (2008). A mixed integer programming model for remanufacturing in reverse logistics environment. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 39(11–12), 1197–1206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Desai, P., et al. (2001). Product differentiation and commonality in design: Balancing revenue and cost drivers. Management Science, 47(1), 37–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Devika, K., Jafarian, A., & Nourbakhsh, V. (2014). Designing a sustainable closed-loop supply chain network based on triple bottom line approach: A comparison of metaheuristics hybridization techniques. European Journal of Operational Research, 235(3), 594–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dowlatshahi, S. (2005). A strategic framework for the design and implementation of remanufacturing operations in reverse logistics. International Journal of Production Research, 43(16), 3455–3480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. EI Saadany, A., & Jaber, M., (2011). A production/remanufacture model with returns’ subassemblies managed differently. International Journal of Production Economics, 133(1), 119–126.Google Scholar
  20. EPA (Environmental Prection Agency). (2011). Statistics on the management of used and end-of-life electronics. http://www.epa.gov/osw/conserve/materials/ecycling/manage.htm
  21. Farrell, R., & Simpson, T. (2003). Product platform design to improve commonality in custom products. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 14(6), 541–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ferrer, G., & Whybark, C. (2001). Material planning for a remanufacturing facility. Production and Operations Management, 10(2), 112–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ferguson, M., et al. (2009). The value of quality grading in remanufacturing. Production and Operations Management, 18(3), 300–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fiksel, J., & Wapman, K. (1994). How to design for environment and minimize life cycle cost. San Francisco, CA: In IEEE symposium on electronics and the environment.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fisher, M., Ramdas, K., & Ulrich, K. (1999). Component sharing in the management of product variety: A study of automotive braking systems. Management Science, 45(3), 297–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Fleischmann, M., et al. (2000). A characterization of logistics networks for product recovery. Omega, 28(6), 653–666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fleischmann, M., et al. (2001). The impact of product recovery on logistics network design. Production and Operations Management, 10(2), 156–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Galbreth, M., & Blackburn, J. (2010). Optimal acquisition quantities in remanufacturing with condition uncertainty. Production and Operations Management, 19(1), 61–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gerchak, Y., Magazine, M., & Gamble, A. (1988). Component commonality with service level requirements. Management Science, 34(6), 753–760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Giuntini, R., & Gaudette, K. (2003). Remanufacturing: The next great opportunity for boosting US productivity. Business Horizons, 46(6), 41–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. González, B., & Adenso-Díaz, B. (2005). A bill of materials-based approach for end-of-life decision making in design for the environment. International Journal of Production Research, 43(10), 2071–2099.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gray, C., & Charter, M. (2008). Remanufacturing and product design. Guildford: South East England Development Agency.Google Scholar
  33. Guide, D., Jayaraman, V., & Srivastava, R. (1999). Production planning and control for remanufacturing: A state-of-the-art survey. Robotics and Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 15(3), 221–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Guide, R. (2000). Production planning and control for remanufacturing: Industry practice and research needs. Journal of Operations Management, 18(4), 467–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Guide, D., & Van Wassenhove, L. (2001). Managing product returns for remanufacturing. Production and Operations Management, 10(2), 142–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Guide, D., Teunter, R., & Van Wassenhove, L. (2003). Matching demand and supply to maximize profits from remanufacturing. Manufacturing and Service Operations Management, 5(4), 303–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hamzaoui-Essoussi, L., & Linton, J. D. (2014). Offering branded remanufactured/recycled products: At what price? Journal of Remanufacturing, 4(9), 1–15.Google Scholar
  38. Hillier, M. (2000). Component commonality in multiple-period, assemble-to-order systems. IIE Transactions, 32(8), 755–766.Google Scholar
  39. Hillier, M. (2002). Using commonality as backup safety stock. European Journal of Operational Research, 136(2), 353–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hauschild, M., Jeswiet, J., & Alting, L. (2004). Design for environment-do we get the focus right? CIRP Annals-Manufacturing Technology, 53(1), 1–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Huang, M., Song, M., Lee, L. H., & Ching, W. K. (2013). Analysis for strategy of closed-loop supply chain with dual recycling channel. International Journal of Production Economics, 144(2), 510–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ijomah, W., et al. (2007). Development of design for remanufacturing guidelines to support sustainable manufacturing. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 23(6), 712–719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Jayaraman, V., Guide, D., & Srivastava, R. (1999). A closed-loop logistics model for remanufacturing. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 50, 497–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Jiao, J., & Tseng, M. M. (1999). A methodology of developing product family architecture for mass customization. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 10(1), 3–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Jiao, J., & Tseng, M. M. (2000). Understanding product family for mass customization by developing commonality indices. Journal of Engineering Design, 11(3), 225–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Jin, X., Ni, J., & Koren, Y. (2011). Optimal control of reassembly with variable quality return in a product remanufacturing system. CIRP Annals-Manufacturing Technology, 60(1), 25–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kaya, O. (2010). Incentive and production decisions for remanufacturing operations. European Journal of Operational Research, 201(2), 442–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Kerr, W., & Ryan, C. (2001). Eco-efficiency gains from remanufacturing: A case study of photocopier remanufacturing at Fuji Xerox Australia. Journal of Cleaner Production, 9(1), 75–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Klausner, M., & Hendrickson, C. (2000). Reverse logistics strategy for product take-back. Interfaces, 30(3), 156–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Kota, S., Sethuraman, K., & Miller, R. (2000). A metric for evaluating design commonality in product families. Journal of Mechanical Design, 122, 403–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Kwak, M. J., Hong, Y. S., & Cho, N. W. (2009). Eco-architecture analysis for end-of-life decision making. International Journal of Production Research, 47(22), 6233–6259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Kwak, M., Kim, H. M., & Thurston, D. (2012). Formulating second-hand market value as a function of product specifications, age, and condition. Transactions of ASME: Journal of Mechanical Design, 134(3), 032001.1–032001.11.Google Scholar
  53. Kuo, T. C., Zhang, H. C., & Huang, S. H. (2000). A graph-based disassembly planning for end-of-life electromechanical products. International Journal of Production Research, 38(5), 993–1007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Lebreton, B., & Tuma, A. (2006). A quantitative approach to assessing the profitability of car and truck tire remanufacturing. International Journal of Production Economics, 104(2), 639–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Li, J., Gonzalez, M., & Zhu, Y. (2009). A hybrid simulation optimization method for production planning of dedicated remanufacturing. International Journal of Production Economics, 117(2), 286–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Lu, Z., & Bostel, N. (2007). A facility location model for logistics systems including reverse flows: The case of remanufacturing activities. Computers & Operations Research, 34(2), 299–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Lund, R. (1984). Remanufacturing: United States experience and implications for developing nations. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  58. Minner, S., & Kiesmuller, G. (2012). Dynamic product acquisition in closed loop supply chains. International Journal of Production Research, 50(11), 2836–2851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Mirchandani, P., & Mishra, A. (2002). Component commonality: Models with product-specific service constraints. Production and Operations Management, 11(2), 199–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Mohebbi, E., & Choobineh, F. (2005). The impact of component commonality in an assemble-to-order environment under supply and demand uncertainty. Omega, 33(6), 472–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. OECD. (2001). Extended producer responsibility: A guidance manual for Governments. Paris: OECD Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Ostlin, J., Sundin, E., & Bjorkman, M. (2008). Importance of closed-loop supply chain relationships for product remanufacturing. International Journal of Production Economics, 115(2), 336–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Ramani, K., Ramanujan, D., Bernstein, W., Zhao, F., Sutherland, J., Handwerker, C., et al. (2010). Integrated sustainable life cycle design: A review. Transactions of ASME: Journal of Mechanical Design, 132(9), 091004. (Special issue on sustainability).Google Scholar
  64. Ray, S., Boyaci, T., & Aras, N. (2005). Optimal prices and trade-in rebates for durable, remanufacturable products. Manufacturing and Service Operations Management, 7(3), 208–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Shu, L., & Flowers, W. (1999). Application of a design-for-remanufacture framework to the selection of product life-cycle fastening and joining methods. Robotics and Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 15(3), 179–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Smith, V., & Keoleian, G. (2004). The value of remanufactured engines. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 8(1–2), 193–221.Google Scholar
  67. Song, J., & Zhao, Y. (2009). The value of component commonality in a dynamic inventory system with lead times. Manufacturing and Service Operations Management, 11(3), 493–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Sundin, E. (2004). Product and process design for remanufacturing. Ph.D. Dissertation No. 906, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Linkopings University, Sweden. ISBN:91-85295-73-6.Google Scholar
  69. Sutherland, J., et al. (2008). A comparison of manufacturing and remanufacturing energy intensities with application to diesel engine production. CIRP Annals-Manufacturing Technology, 57(1), 5–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Thevenot, H. J., & Simpson, T. W. (2006). Commonality indices for product family design: A detailed comparison. Journal of Engineering Design, 17(2), 99–119.Google Scholar
  71. United States International Trade Commission. (2012). Remanufactured goods: An overview of the U.S. and global industries, markets, and trade. Investigation No. 332-525, USITC Publication 4356, USA.Google Scholar
  72. Van der Laan, E., et al. (1999). Inventory control in hybrid systems with remanufacturing. Management Science, 45(5), 733–747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Wheelwright, S. C., & Clark, K. B. (1992). Creating project plans to focus product development. Harvard Business Review, 70(2), 70–82.Google Scholar
  74. Wheelwright, S. C., & Clark, K. B. (1995). Leading product development. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  75. Xiong, Y., Li, G., Zhou, Y., Fernandes, K., Harrison, R., & Xiong, Z. (2014). Dynamic pricing models for used products in remanufacturing with lost-sales and uncertain quality. International Journal of Production Economics, 147, 678–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Zhao, Y., Pandey, V., Kim, H. M., & Thurston, D. (2010). Varying lifecycle lengths within a product take-back portfolio. Transactions of ASME: Journal of Mechanical Design, 132(9), 091012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Zwolinski, P., Lopex-Ontiveros, M., & Brissaud, D. (2006). Integrated design of remanufacturable products based on product profiles. Journal of Cleaner Production, 14(15), 1333–1345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wenyuan Wang
    • 1
  • Daniel Y. Mo
    • 2
    Email author
  • Yue Wang
    • 2
  • Mitchell M. Tseng
    • 3
  1. 1.Isis InnovationUniversity of OxfordKowloonHong Kong
  2. 2.Department of Supply Chain and Information ManagementHang Seng Management CollegeSha TinHong Kong
  3. 3.International School of Technology and ManagementFeng Chia UniversityTaichungTaiwan

Personalised recommendations