Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing

, Volume 28, Issue 6, pp 1409–1419 | Cite as

Design and optimization of turbine blade preform forging using RSM and NSGA II

  • S. H. R. Torabi
  • S. Alibabaei
  • B. Barooghi Bonab
  • M. H. Sadeghi
  • Gh. Faraji
Article

Abstract

Forging is one of the production methods of turbine blades. But, because of the complexities of the blades, they cannot be produced in one stage and using preforms is necessary. In this paper, an extruded elliptical cross section was considered as blade preform, then response surface method and multi-objective genetic algorithm was used to optimize this preform. Maximum filling ratio of the final die and minimum flash volume, forging force and strain variance of final blade were considered as objectives of optimization. Design Expert software was used for design of experiment and optimization. Also Deform-3D software was applied to simulate the forging process. The optimized preform was compared with the preform resulted from conventional preform designing method. Results show that optimization method gives better results than conventional method. Also physical modeling was used for verification of simulation results. Results show simulation results have a good corresponding with experimental results.

Keywords

Forging of turbine blades Preform optimization Response surface method Multi-objective optimization 

References

  1. Alberti, N., et al. (1998). Intelligent computation techniques for process planning of cold forging. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 9(4), 353–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alimirzaloo, V., Sadeghi, M., & Biglari, F. (2012). Optimization of the forging of aerofoil blade using the finite element method and fuzzy-Pareto based genetic algorithm. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 26(6), 1801–1810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Atashkari, K., et al. (2005). Thermodynamic Pareto optimization of turbojet engines using multi-objective genetic algorithms. International Journal of Thermal Sciences, 44(11), 1061–1071.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bakhtiari, H., Karimi, M., & Rezazadeh, S. (2014). Modeling, analysis and multi-objective optimization of twist extrusion process using predictive models and meta-heuristic approaches, based on finite element results. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing. doi: 10.1007/s10845-014-0879-6.
  5. Bariani, P., Dal Negro, T., & Fioretti, M. (1999). Hot workability studies of Nimonic 80A applied to the net-shape forging of aerofoil blades. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bariani, P., Bruschi, S., & Dal Negro, T. (2004). Integrating physical and numerical simulation techniques to design the hot forging process of stainless steel turbine blades. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 44(9), 945–951.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Breitsprecher, T., & Wartzack, S. (2014). Neural network based modeling and optimization of deep drawing-extrusion combined process. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 25(1), 77–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cai, J., Li, F., & Liu, T. (2011). A new approach of preform design based on 3D electrostatic field simulation and geometric transformation. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 56(5–8), 579–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Deb, K. (2001). Multi-objective optimization using evolutionary algorithms (Vol. 16). New Jersey: Wiley.Google Scholar
  10. DEFORMTM, S. (2007). 3D Version 6.1 (sp1) User’s Manual Oct 10th 2007, Corporation SFT.Google Scholar
  11. Gao, T., Yang, H., & LIU, Y.-L. (2006). Backward tracing simulation of precision forging process for blade based on 3D FEM. Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China, 16, s639–s644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hsiang, S.-H., Kuo, J.-L., & Yang, F.-Y. (2006). Using artificial neural networks to investigate the influence of temperature on hot extrusion of AZ61 magnesium alloy. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 17(2), 191–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hsiang, S.-H., Lin, Y.-W., & Lai, J.-W. (2012). Application of fuzzy-based Taguchi method to the optimization of extrusion of magnesium alloy bicycle carriers. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 23(3), 629–638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hu, Z., & Dean, T. (2001). Aspects of forging of titanium alloys and the production of blade forms. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 111(1), 10–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kim, N., & Kobayashi, S. (1990). Preform design in H-shaped cross sectional axisymmetric forging by the finite element method. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 30(2), 243–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lee, S., et al. (2002). A new method of preform design in hot forging by using electric field theory. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 44(4), 773–792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lu, B., et al. (2009). 3D die shape optimisation for net-shape forging of aerofoil blades. Materials and Design, 30(7), 2490–2500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lu, B., Ou, H., & Cui, Z. (2011). Shape optimisation of preform design for precision close-die forging. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 44(6), 785–796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lv, C., et al. (2008). 3D FEM simulation of the multi-stage forging process of a gas turbine compressor blade. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 198(1), 463–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Montgomery, D. C. (2008). Design and analysis of experiments. New Jersey: Wiley.Google Scholar
  21. Ou, H., & Balendra, R. (1998). Modelling techniques for nett-forging of turbine blades. in IMECHE Conference Transactions. Mechanical Engineering Publications.Google Scholar
  22. Ou, H., & Balendra, R. (1998). Preform design for forging of aerofoil sections using FE simulation. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 80, 144–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Pareto, V. (1897). Cours d’Economic Politique (Vol. II). Lausanne: F. Rouge.Google Scholar
  24. Roy, S., Ghosh, S., & Shivpuri, R. (1997). A new approach to optimal design of multi-stage metal forming processes with micro genetic algorithms. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 37(1), 29–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sarkar, D., & Modak, J. M. (2005). Pareto-optimal solutions for multi-objective optimization of fed-batch bioreactors using nondominated sorting genetic algorithm. Chemical Engineering Science, 60(2), 481–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Shao, Y., Lu, B., Ou, H., & Chen, J. (2014). A new approach of preform design for forging of 3D blade based on evolutionary structural optimization. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization. doi: 10.1007/s00158-014-1110-2.
  27. Shao, Y., et al. (2014). Evolutionary forging preform design optimization using strain-based criterion. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 71(1–4), 69–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Vosniakos, G.-C., Segredou, I., & Giannakakis, T. (2005). Logic programming for process planning in the domain of sheet metal forming with progressive dies. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 16(4–5), 479–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Yanhui, Y., et al. (2009). Multi-objective preform optimization using RSM. Rare Metal Materials and Engineering, 38(6), 1019–1024.Google Scholar
  30. Yanhui, Y., et al. (2010). Optimization of preform shapes by RSM and FEM to improve deformation homogeneity in aerospace forgings. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 23(2), 260– 267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Yuli, L., et al. (2000). Physical modeling of blade forging. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 99(1), 141–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Zhan, M., Yang, H., & Liu, Y. (2004). Deformation characteristic of the precision forging of a blade with a damper platform using 3D FEM analysis. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 150(3), 290–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Zhao, G., Wright, E., & Grandhi, R. V. (1997). Sensitivity analysis based preform die shape design for net-shape forging. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 37(9), 1251–1271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Zhao, X., et al. (2002). Preform die shape design for uniformity of deformation in forging based on preform sensitivity analysis. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 128(1), 25–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Zhou, J., et al. (2013). Optimization of an aluminum alloy anti-collision side beam hot stamping process using a multi-objective genetic algorithm. Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, 13(3), 401–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. H. R. Torabi
    • 1
  • S. Alibabaei
    • 1
  • B. Barooghi Bonab
    • 2
  • M. H. Sadeghi
    • 3
  • Gh. Faraji
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Mechanical Engineering, College of EngineeringUniversity of TehranTehranIran
  2. 2.Mechanical Engineering DepartmentShahid Rajaee UniversityTehranIran
  3. 3.Mechanical Engineering DepartmentTarbiat Modares UniversityTehranIran

Personalised recommendations