Measures of reconfigurability and its key characteristics in intelligent manufacturing systems
- 722 Downloads
In recent years, the fields of reconfigurable manufacturing systems, holonic manufacturing systems, and multi-agent systems have made technological advances to support the ready reconfiguration of automated manufacturing systems. While these technological advances have demonstrated robust operation and been qualitatively successful in achieving reconfigurability, limited effort has been devoted to the measurement of reconfigurability in the resultant systems. Hence, it is not clear (1) to which degree these designs have achieved their intended level of reconfigurability, (2) which systems are indeed quantitatively more reconfigurable and (3) how these designs may overcome their design limitations to achieve greater reconfigurability in subsequent design iterations. Recently, a reconfigurability measurement process based upon axiomatic design knowledge base and the design structure matrix has been developed. Together, they provide quantitative measures of reconfiguration potential and ease. This paper now builds upon these works to provide a set of composite reconfigurability measures. Among these are measures for the key characteristics of reconfigurability: integrability, convertibility, and customization, which have driven the qualitative and intuitive design of these technological advances. These measures are then demonstrated on an illustrative example followed by a discussion of how they adhere to requirements for reconfigurability measurement in automated and intelligent manufacturing systems.
KeywordsReconfigurability Axiomatic design for large flexible systems Design structure matrix Reconfigurable manufacturing systems Multi-agent systems Holonic manufacturing systems
- ANSI-ISA. (2005). Enterprise control system integration part 3: Activity models of manufacturing operations management. Technical report: The International Society of Automation.Google Scholar
- Baca, E. E. S., Farid, A. M., & Tsai, I. T. (2013) An axiomatic design approach to passenger itinerary enumeration in reconfigurable transportation systems. In Proceedings of ICAD2013 the 7th international conference on axiomatic design, Worcester, MA (pp. 138–145). http://amfarid.scripts.mit.edu/resources/ETN-C02.pdf.
- Bellifemine, F., Caire, G., & Greenwood, D. (2007) Developing Multi-agent systems with JADE. Wiley, Hoboken. http://homepages.abdn.ac.uk/w.w.vasconcelos/pages/teaching/CS4027/abdn.only/jade_book.pdf.
- Brennan, R., & Norrie, D. H. (2001). Agents, holons and function blocks: Distributed intelligent control in manufacturing. Journal of Applied Systems Science: Special Issue, 2(1), 1–19.Google Scholar
- Carr, J. (2002) Recipes for intelligent products. Technical Report.Google Scholar
- Cerni, R. H., & Foster, L. E. (1962). Instrumentation for engineering measurment. Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Dijkstra, E. W. (1990). Beyond structured programming: An introduction to the principles of software metrics. Journal of Structured Programming, 11(1) 268–277.Google Scholar
- Ejiogu, L. O. (1991). Software engineering with formal metrics. New York: QED Technical Publishing Group: McGraw-Hill Book Company.Google Scholar
- Farid, A. M. (2007). Reconfigurability measurement in automated manufacturing systems. Ph.d. dissertation, University of Cambridge Engineering Department Institute for Manufacturing. http://amfarid.scripts.mit.edu/resources/RMS-T01.pdf.
- Farid, A. M. (2008a). Facilitating ease of system reconfiguration through measures of manufacturing modularity. In Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B (Journal of Engineering Manufacture)-invited paper, 222(B10):1275–1288. doi: 10.1243/09544054JEM1055.
- Farid, A. M. (2008b). Product degrees of freedom as manufacturing system reconfiguration potential measures. International Transactions on Systems Science and Applications-invited paper, 4(3):227–242. http://amfarid.scripts.mit.edu/resources/RMS-J03.pdf.
- Farid, A. M. (2013). An axiomatic design approach to non-assembled production path enumeration in reconfigurable manufacturing systems. In 2013 IEEE international conference on systems man and cybernetics (pp. 1–8). Manchester, UK. doi: 10.1109/SMC.2013.659.
- Farid, A. M. (2014a). Static resilience of large flexible engineering systems : part I—Axiomatic design model. In 4th International engineering systems symposium (pp. 1–8). Hoboken, NJ. http://amfarid.scripts.mit.edu/resources/CESUN1.pdf.
- Farid, A. M. (2014b) Static resilience of large flexible engineering systems : Part II—axiomatic design measures. In 4th International engineering systems symposium (pp. 1–8)Google Scholar
- Farid, A. M., & Covanich, W. (2008). Measuring the effort of a reconfiguration process. In IEEE international conference on emerging technologies and factory automation, 2008. ETFA 2008 (pp. 1137–1144). Hamburg, Germany. doi: 10.1109/ETFA.2008.4638540.
- Farid, A. M., & McFarlane, D. C. (2006a). A development of degrees of freedom for manufacturing systems. In IMS’2006: 5th international symposium on intelligent manufacturing systems: agents and virtual worlds (pp. 1–6). Sakarya, Turkey. http://amfarid.scripts.mit.edu/resources/RMS-C03.pdf.
- Farid, A. M., & McFarlane, D. C. (2006b). A tool for assessing reconfigurability of distributed manufacturing systems. In: 12th IFAC symposium on information control problems in manufacturing, INCOM 2006, and associated industrial meetings: EMM’2006, BPM’2006, JT’2006, May 17, 2006– May 19, 2006, IFAC Secretariat, Saint Etienne, France, IFAC Proceedings Volumes (IFAC-PapersOnline) (Vol. 12, pp. 1–6). http://amfarid.scripts.mit.edu/resources/RMS-C02.pdf.
- Farid, A. M., & McFarlane, D. C. (2006c). An approach to the application of the design structure matrix for assessing reconfigurability of distributed manufacturing systems. In Proceedings of the IEEE workshop on distributed intelligent systems: Collective intelligence and its applications (DIS’06), IEEE Comput. Soc, Prague, Czech republic, IEEE workshop on distributed intelligent systems: collective intelligence and its applications (pp. 1–6). doi: 10.1109/DIS.2006.10.
- Farid, A. M., & McFarlane, D. C. (2007). A design structure matrix based method for reconfigurability measurement of distributed manufacturing systems. International Journal of Intelligent Control and Systems Special Issue- invited paper, 12(2):118–129. http://www.ezconf.net/IJICS/files/77/final-3.pdf.
- Farid, A. M., & McFarlane, D. C. (2008). Production degrees of freedom as manufacturing system reconfiguration potential measures. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B (Journal of Engineering Manufacture)-invited paper, 222(B10):1301–1314. doi: 10.1243/09544054JEM1056, http://pib.sagepub.com/content/222/10/1301.
- Friedenthal, S., Moore, A., & Steiner, R. (2011). A practical guide to SysML: The systems modeling language (2nd ed.). Burlington, MA: Morgan Kaufmann.Google Scholar
- Gasevic, D., Djuric, D., & Devedzic, V. (2009). Model driven engineering and ontology development (2nd ed.). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
- Group, O. (2007). Common object request broker architecture: Core specification. Technical report.Google Scholar
- Marik, V., Fletcher, M., Pechoucek, M., Stepankova, O., Krautwurmova, H., & Luck, M. (2002) Holons and agents: Recent developments and mutual impacts. In Multi-agent systems and applications II: Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence (pp. 233–267). Springer, Berlin.Google Scholar
- McFarlane, D., Bussmann, S., & Deen, S. M. (2003). Holonic manufacturing control: Rationales, developments and open issues. In: Agent-Based Manufacturing (pp. 303–326). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
- McFarlane, D., Carr, C., Harrison, M., & McDonald, A. (2002). Auto-ID’s three R’s: Rules and recipes for product requirements. Technical report.Google Scholar
- Munroe, M. E. (1971). Measure and integration. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
- Oliver, D. W., Kelliher, T. P., & Keegan, J. G. (1997). Engineering complex systems with models and objects. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
- Pine, J. B. (1993). Mass customization: The new frontier in business competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
- Ribeiro, L., & Barata, J. (2013). Self-organizing multiagent mechatronic systems in perspective. In IEEE international conference on industrial informatics, IEEE, Bochum, Germany, 2013 11th IEEE International Conference on Industrial Informatics (INDIN) (pp. 392–397). doi: 10.1109/INDIN.2013.6622916.
- Setchi, R. M., & Lagos, N. (2005). Reconfigurability and reconfigurable manufacturing systems: State of the art review. In: Innovative production machines and systems: Production automation and control state of the art review (pp. 131–143). Cardiff, UK: Nework of Excellence, Innovative Production Machines and Systems.Google Scholar
- Suh, N. P. (2001). Axiomatic design: Advances and applications. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Trappey, A., Trappey, C., & Ni, W. C. (2013). A multi-agent collaborative maintenance platform applying game theory negotiation strategies. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 24(3), 613–623. doi: 10.1007/s10845-011-0606-5.
- Vallee, M., Merdan, M., Lepuschitz, W., & Koppensteiner, G. (2011). Decentralized reconfiguration of a flexible transportation system. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 7(3), 505–516. doi: 10.1109/TII.2011.2158839.
- Viswanath, A., Baca, E. E. S., & Farid, A. M. (2013). An axiomatic design approach to passenger itinerary enumeration in reconfigurable transportation systems. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems (99):1–10. doi: 10.1109/TITS.2013.2293340.
- Vyatkin, V. (2007). IEC 61499 function blocks for embedded and distributed control systems. Research Triangle Park, NC: Instrumentation Society of America.Google Scholar
- Wikipedia. (2007) Ontology. Technical report.Google Scholar
- Wu, D., Zhang, L., Jiao, R., & Lu, R. (2013). SysML-based design chain information modeling for variety management in production reconfiguration. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 24(3), 575–596. doi: 10.1007/s10845-011-0585-6.
- Zuse, H. (1991). Software complexity: Measures and methods. Hawthorne, NJ: Walter de Gruyter & CoGoogle Scholar