Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing

, Volume 25, Issue 1, pp 77–84 | Cite as

Neural network based modeling and optimization of deep drawing – extrusion combined process

  • Moh’d Sami Ashhab
  • Thilo Breitsprecher
  • Sandro Wartzack
Article

Abstract

A combined deep drawing–extrusion process is modeled with artificial neural networks (ANN’s). The process is used for manufacturing synchronizer rings and it combines sheet and bulk metal forming processes. Input–output data relevant to the process was collected. The inputs represent geometrical parameters of the synchronizer ring and the outputs are the total equivalent plastic strain (TEPS), contact ratio and forming force. This data is used to train the ANN which approximates the input-output relation well and therefore can be relied on in predicting the process input parameters that will result in desired outputs provided by the designer. The complex method constrained optimization is applied to the ANN model to find the inputs or geometrical parameters that will produce the desired or optimum values of TEPS, contact ratio and forming force. This information will be very hard to obtain by just looking at the available historical input–output data. Therefore, the presented technique is very useful for selection of process design parameters to obtain desired product properties.

Keywords

Sheet-bulk metal forming Deep drawing–extrusion Synchronizer ring Neural networks Constrained optimization 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ashhab M. S. (2008) Optimization and modeling of a photovoltaic solar integrated system by neural networks. Energy Conversion and Management 49(11): 3349–3355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chiang Y., Chang L., Chang F. (2004) Comparison of static-feedforward and dynamic- feedback neural networks for rainfall–runoff modeling. Journal of Hydrology 290(3–4): 297–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Haykin S. (1998) Neural networks: A comprehensive foundation. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJGoogle Scholar
  4. Huang W., Kovacevic R. (2011) A neural network and multiple regression method for the characterization of the depth of weld penetration in laser welding based on acoustic signatures. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 22(2): 131–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Jeguirim S. E., Dhouib A. B., Sahnoun M., Cheikhrouhou M., Schacher L., Adolphe D. (2011) The use of fuzzy logic and neural networks models for sensory properties prediction from process and structure parameters of knitted fabrics. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 22(6): 873–884CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Johnston A. B., Maguireb L. P., McGinnity T. M. (2009) Downstream performance prediction for a manufacturing system using neural networks and six-sigma improvement techniques. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing 25(3): 513–521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Makarynskyy O. (2004) Improving wave predictions with artificial neural networks. Ocean Engineering 31(5–6): 709–724CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Merklein, M., Koch, J., Schneider, T., & Oppelt, S. (2010). Manufacturing of complex functional components with variants by using a new metal forming process—sheet-bulk metal forming. In Proceedings of conference on material forming, ESAFORM, Brescia.Google Scholar
  9. Mungiole M., Keith Wilson D. (2006) Prediction of outdoor sound transmission loss with an artificial neural network. Applied Acoustics 67(4): 324–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Patterson D. (1990) Introduction to artificial intelligence and expert systems. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJGoogle Scholar
  11. Quintana G., Garcia-Romeu M. L., Ciurana J. (2011) Surface roughness monitoring application based on artificial neural networks for ball-end milling operations. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 22(4): 607–617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Radha Ramanan T., Sridharan R., Shashikant K. S., Noorul Haq A. (2011) An artificial neural network based heuristic for flow shop scheduling problems. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 22(2): 279–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Reddy K., Ranjan M. (2003) Solar resource estimation using artificial neural networks and comparison with other correlation models. Energy Conversion and Management 44(15): 2519–2530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Reklaitis G. (2002) Engineering optimization. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. Röhner, S., Breitsprecher, T., & Wartzack, S. (2011). Acquisition of design-relevant knowledge within the development of sheet-bulk metal forming. In: Proceedings of the 18th international conference on engineering design, Kopenhagen, Denmark.Google Scholar
  16. Tian Z. (2012) An artificial neural network method for remaining useful life prediction of equipment subject to condition monitoring. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 23(2): 227–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Vandegriff J., Wagstaff K., Ho G., Plauger J. (2005) Forecasting space weather: Predicting interplanetary shocks using neural networks. Advances in Space Research 36(12): 2323–2327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Wang Q. (2007) Artificial neural networks as cost engineering methods in a collaborative manufacturing environment. International Journal of Production Economics 109(1–2): 53–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Moh’d Sami Ashhab
    • 1
    • 2
  • Thilo Breitsprecher
    • 1
  • Sandro Wartzack
    • 1
  1. 1.Lehrstuhl für KonstruktionstechnikFriedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-NürnbergErlangenGermany
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical EngineeringThe Hashemite UniversityZarqaJordan

Personalised recommendations