Advertisement

Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing

, Volume 23, Issue 5, pp 1893–1902 | Cite as

Using artificial intelligence to predict surface roughness in deep drilling of steel components

  • Andres Bustillo
  • Maritza Correa
Article

Abstract

A predictive model is presented to optimize deep drilling operations under high speed conditions for the manufacture of steel components such as moulds and dies. The input data include cutting parameters and axial cutting forces measured by sensors on the milling centres where the tests are performed. The novelty of the paper lies in the use of Bayesian Networks that consider the cooling system as an input variable for the optimization of roughness quality in deep drilling operations. Two different coolant strategies are tested: traditional working fluid and MQL (Minimum Quantity Lubrication). The model is based on a machine learning classification method known as Bayesian networks. Various measures used to assess the model demonstrate its suitability to control this type of industrial task. Its ease of interpretation is a further advantage in comparison with other artificial intelligence tools, which makes it a user-friendly application for machine operators.

Keywords

Deep drilling Bayesian networks Supervised classification Minimum quantity lubrication (MQL) Surface roughness 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1302 I. (1992). Technical drawings—method of indicating surface texture. International organization for standardization.Google Scholar
  2. 4288 I. (1996). Geometrical product specifications (GPS)—surface texture: Profile method—rules and procedures for the assessment of surface texture. International organization for standardization.Google Scholar
  3. Abukhshim N., Mativenga P., Sheikh A. (2006) Heat generation and temperature prediction in metal cutting: A review and implications for high speed machining. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture 46(7–8): 782–800CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baradie M. E. (1996) Cutting fluids: Part i. Characterisation. Journal of Materials Processing Technology 56: 786–797CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Biermann D., Kersting M., Kessler N. (2009) Process adapted structure optimization of deep hole drilling tools. CIRP Annals Manufacturing Technology 58(1): 89–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Biglari F., Fang X. (1995) Real-time fuzzy-logic control for maximizing the tool life of small-diameter drills. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 72(1): 91–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Braga D., Diniz A., Miranda G., Coppinni N. (2002) Using a minimum quantity of lubrication and a diamond coated tool in drilling of aluminum-silicon alloys. Journal of Materials Processing Technology 122: 127–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Castillo E., Gutiérrez E., Hadi A. (1997) Expert systems and probabilistic network models. Springer, NYCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chandrasekaran M., Muralidhar M., Krishna C. M., Dixit U. S. (2010) Application of soft computing techniques in machining performance prediction and optimization: A literature review. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technologie 46: 445–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chawla N., Bowyer K., Hall L., Kegelmeyer W. (2002) Smote: Synthetic minority over-sampling technique. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 16: 321–357Google Scholar
  11. Choudhary A., Harding J., Tiwari M. (2009) Data mining in manufacturing: A review based on the kind of knowledge. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 20(5): 501–521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chow C., Liu C. (1968) Approximating discrete probability distributions. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 14: 462–467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Coldwell H., Woods R., Paul M., Koshy P., Dewes R., Aspinwall D. (2003) Rapid machining of hardened aisi h13 and d2 moulds, dies and press tools. Journal of Materials Processing Technology 135: 301–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Correa M., Bielza C., de Ramirez J. M., Alique J. (2008) A bayesian network model for surface roughness prediction in the machining process. International Journal of Systems Science 39(12): 1181–1192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Correa M., Bielza C., Pamies-Teixeira J. (2009) Comparison of bayesian networks and artificial neural networks for quality detection in a machining process. Expert Systems with Applications 36: 7270–7279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Davim J., Sreejith P., Gomes R., Peixoto C. (2006) Experimental studies on drilling of aluminium (aa1050) under dry, minimum quantity of lubricant, and flood-lubricated conditions. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part B-Journal of Engineering Manufacture 220(10): 1605–1611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Filipovic A., Stephenson D. (1996) Minimum quantity lubrication (mql) applications in automotive power-train machining. Mechanical Science and Technology 10: 3–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Friedman N., Geiger D., Goldszmit M. (1997) Bayesian network classifiers. Machine Learning 29: 131–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Grzenda, M., Bustillo, A., Zawistowski, P. (2010). A soft computing system using intelligent imputation strategies for roughness prediction in deep drilling. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 1–11. Article in Press.Google Scholar
  20. Haber R., Haber-Haber R., Jimenez A., Galan R. (2009) An optimal fuzzy control system in a network environment based on simulated annealing. An application to a drilling process. Applied Soft Computing Journal 9(3): 889–895CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hashmi K., Graham I., Mills B. (2000) Fuzzy logic based data selection for the drilling process. Journal of Materials Processing Technology 108(1): 55–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hayajneh N. (2001) Hole quality in deep hole drilling source. Materials and Manufacturing Processes 16(2): 147–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Heinemann R., Hinduja S., Barrow G., Petuelli G. (2006) Effect of mql on the tool life of small twist drills in deep-hole drilling. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture 46(1): 1–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Heinemann R., Hinduja S., Barrow G. (2007) Use of process signals for tool wear progression sensing in drilling small deep holes. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 33(3–4): 243–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jantunen E., Vaajoensuu E. (2010) Self adaptive diagnosis of tool wear with a microcontroller. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 21(2): 223–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Karnik S. R., Gaitonde V. N., Davim J. P. (2008) A comparative study of the ann and rsm modeling approaches for predicting burr size in drilling. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 38(9–10): 868–883CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kubota H., Tabei H. (1999) Drilling of a small and deep hole using a twist drill. Transactions of the Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers, Part C 62(601): 3691–3697CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lorincz J. (2006) Drilling to the limits: Innovative holemaking tools can improve cycle time, reduce cost per hole. Manufacturing Engineering 136(4): 71–75Google Scholar
  29. Mehrabadi I., Nouri M., Madoliat R. (2009) Investigating chatter vibration in deep drilling, including process damping and the gyroscopic effect. International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture 49(12–13): 939–946CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Nandi A., Davim J. (2009) A study of drilling performances with minimum quantity of lubricant using fuzzy logic rules. Mechatronics 19(2): 218–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Neapolitan R. (2004) Learning bayesian networks. Prentice Hall, Englewood CliffsGoogle Scholar
  32. Ripley B. (1996) Pattern recognition and neural networks. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  33. Sanjay C., Neema M., Chin C. (2005) Modeling of tool wear in drilling by statistical analysis and artificial neural network. Journal of Materials Processing Technology 170(3): 494–500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Weinert K., Inasaki I., Sutherland J., Wakabayashi T. (2004) Dry machining and minimum quantity lubrication. Annals CIRP 53(2): 511–537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Zang J., Liang S., Yao J., Chen J., Hang J. (2006) Evolutionary optimization of machining processes. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 17(2): 203–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Zhang J., Chen J. (2009) Surface roughness optimization in a drilling operation using the taguchi design method. Materials and Manufacturing Processes 24(4): 459–467CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringUniversity of BurgosBurgosSpain
  2. 2.Centro de Automática y Robótica (CAR) UPM-CSICArganda del Rey, MadridSpain
  3. 3.Escuela Politécnica SuperiorUniversidad Autónoma de MadridMadridSpain

Personalised recommendations