Support vector machines models for surface roughness prediction in CNC turning of AISI 304 austenitic stainless steel
- First Online:
- 691 Downloads
In the present investigation, three different type of support vector machines (SVMs) tools such as least square SVM (LS-SVM), Spider SVM and SVM-KM and an artificial neural network (ANN) model were developed to estimate the surface roughness values of AISI 304 austenitic stainless steel in CNC turning operation. In the development of predictive models, turning parameters of cutting speed, feed rate and depth of cut were considered as model variables. For this purpose, a three-level full factorial design of experiments (DOE) method was used to collect surface roughness values. A feedforward neural network based on backpropagation algorithm was a multilayered architecture made up of 15 hidden neurons placed between input and output layers. The prediction results showed that the all used SVMs results were better than ANN with high correlations between the prediction and experimentally measured values.
KeywordsSurface roughness Support vector machines AISI 304 machining
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Canu, S., Grandvalet, Y., Guigue, V., & Rakotomamonjy, A. (2005). SVM and Kernel Methods Matlab Toolbox, Perception Systèmes et Information, INSA de Rouen, Rouen, France.Google Scholar
- Chang, P. C., Lin, J. J., & Dzan, W. Y. (2010). Forecasting of manufacturing cost in mobile phone products by case-based reasoning and artificial neural network models. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing. doi:10.1007/s10845-010-0390-7.
- Demuth H., Beale M., Hagan M. (2006) Neural network toolbox 5, user’s guide. The Mathworks, Inc, MA, pp 9–16Google Scholar
- Drucker, H., Burges, C. J. C., Kaufman, L., Smola, A., & Vapnik, V. (1997). Support vector regression machines. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 9, NIPS 1996, 155–161, MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Ekici S., Yıldırım S., Poyraz M. (2009) A pattern recognition application for distance protection. Journal of The Faculty of Engineering and Architecture of Gazi University 241: 51–56Google Scholar
- Ezugwu E. O., Fadare D. A., Bonney J., Da Silva R. B., Sales W. F. (2005) Modeling the correlation between cutting and process parameters in high-speed machining of Inconel 718 alloy using an artificial neural network. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture 45: 1375–1385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gaitonde, V. N., Karnik, S. R., Figueira, L., & Davim, J. P. (2009) Machinability investigations in hard turning of AISI D2 cold work tool steel with conventional and wiper ceramic inserts. International Journal of Refractory Metals and Hard Materials (in press).Google Scholar
- Hearst, M. A. (1998). Support vector machines. IEEE Intelligent Systems 18–21.Google Scholar
- Karayel, D. (2008). Prediction and control of surface roughness in CNC lathe using artificial neural network. Journal of Materials Processing Technology.Google Scholar
- Nalbant M., Gökkaya H., Toktaş I., Sur G. (2009) The experimental investigation of the effects of uncoated, PVD- and CVD-coated cemented carbide inserts and cutting parameters on surface roughness in CNC turning and its prediction using artificial neural network. Robotics and Computer Integrated Manufacturing 25: 211–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Smola, A. J., & Schölkopf, B. (1998). A tutorial on support vector regression. Technical Report NC2-TR-1998-030, ESPRIT Working Group in Neural and Computational Learning.Google Scholar
- Suykens, J. A. K., Van Gestel, T., De Brabanter, J., De Moor, B., & Vandewalle, J. (2002). Least squares support vector machines. World Scientific, Singapore, (ISBN 981-238-151-1).Google Scholar
- Vojtech, F., & Hlavac, V. (2004). Statistical pattern recognition toolbox for MATLAB (SPRTOOL). User’s Guide; http://cmp.felk.cvut.cz/cmp/cmpsoftware.html.
- Weston, J., Elisseeff, A., Bakır, G., & Sinz, F. (2006). The spider software package. http://www.kyb.tuebingen.mpg.de/bs/people/spider.