Advertisement

Journal of International Entrepreneurship

, Volume 14, Issue 1, pp 121–155 | Cite as

Typology of diaspora entrepreneurship: Case studies in Uzbekistan

  • Maria Elo
Article

Abstract

The characteristics and importance of transnational diasporans as entrepreneurs for the economy and international business of emerging countries have remained underexplored. This paper addresses types of diaspora entrepreneurship (DE) theoretically and empirically in the context of Uzbekistan. Diaspora entrepreneurship is often seen as necessity-driven and less opportunity-driven. So far, emerging Central-Asian countries are considered countries of origin (COOs) of diasporans, but not yet as countries wherein diasporans want to invest and work, that is, countries of residence (CORs). Uzbekistan is also a post-Soviet economy with limited tradition on private entrepreneurship. Thus, the paper asks what makes people become entrepreneurs in emerging countries such as Uzbekistan when they have alternative opportunities in developed countries. It explores key drivers and socio-cultural reasons for the entry and establishment decision and introduces a typology of DE. This multiple case study presents implications and findings on culturally different entrepreneurs who have decided to enter Uzbek business elucidating their motivations and role in transition economies.

Keywords

Diaspora entrepreneurship Typology Transition economy Uzbekistan Entry drivers Transnational diaspora 

Abstrakt

Die Charakteristika und die Bedeutung der transnationalen Diasporans als Unternehmer für die Wirtschaft und das internationale Geschäft in den Schwellenländern sind inadäquat erforscht geblieben. Dieses Papier befasst Arten von Diaspora Unternehmertum (DE) theoretisch und empirisch im Kontext von Usbekistan. Diaspora Unternehmertum wird häufig betrachtet als Notwendigkeit-getrieben und weniger durch Chancen. Bisher Zentralasiatischen Schwellenländer werden als Herkunftsländer (COOs)von Diasporans betrachtet, aber noch nicht als Aufenthaltsländern (CORS) in welchen die Diasporans investieren und leben möchten. Daher wird hier gefragt, was die Menschen zu Unternehmern in Schwellenländern wie Usbekistan treibt, wenn sie alternative Möglichkeiten in entwickelten Ländern haben. Zusätzlich, Usbekistan ist ein Post-Sowjetische Ökonomie mit begrenzten Tradition für private Unternehmertum. Die Studie erforscht Schlüsselfaktoren und soziokulturelle Gründe für die Markteintritt und Gründungsentscheidung, und präsentieren einer Typologie der DE. Diese Mehrfachfallstudie präsentiert Auswirkungen und Ergebnisse zu kulturell verschiedene Unternehmer, die sich entschieden haben usbekischen Unternehmer zu werden, die klärt ihre Beweggründe auf, und ihre Rolle in den Transformationsländern.

Schlüsselwörter

Diaspora Unternehmertum Typologie Übergangswirtschaft Usbekistan Markteintritt-Treiber transnationale Diaspora 

JEL Classification

F22 F21 J15 D01 H30 O29 

References

  1. Abdurakhmonov M (2003) FDI scenario in Uzbekistan—glancing at the first decade after the independence. Econ J Hokkaido Univ 32:183–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aharoni Y (1966) The foreign investment decision process. Harvard Graduate School of Business Administration, BostonGoogle Scholar
  3. Alasuutari P (1995) Researching culture: qualitative method and cultural studies. Sage Publications, LondonGoogle Scholar
  4. Ali A, Tagi A, Krishman K (1997) Individualism, collectivism and decision styles. J Soc Psychol 137(1997):629–637CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Aliaga-Isla R, Rialp A (2012) How do information and experience play a role in the discovery of entrepreneurial opportunities? The case of Latin-American immigrants in Barcelona. Lat Am Bus Rev 13(1):59–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Aliaga-Isla R, Rialp A (2013) Systematic review of immigrant entrepreneurship literature: previous findings and ways forward. Entrep Reg Dev 25(9–10):819–844. doi: 10.1080/08985626.2013.845694 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Arslan A, Tarba SY, Larimo J (2015) FDI entry strategies and the impacts of economic freedom distance: evidence from Nordic FDIs in transitional periphery of CIS and SEE. Int Bus Rev 24(6):997–1008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Azizov A (2007) Determinants of FDI in CIS countries with transition economy. (Unpublished master’s thesis). Aarhus School of Business, Åarhus, DenmarkGoogle Scholar
  9. Barnard H, Pendock C (2012) To share or not to share: the role of affect in knowledge sharing by individuals in a diaspora. J Int Manag 19(1):47–65. doi: 10.1016/j.intman.2012.22.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bikbaeva G, Gaibnazarova M (2009) Impact of microfinance on alleviating rural poverty in Uzbekistan. Probl Econ Transit 52(2):67–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bolt P (1997) Chinese diaspora entrepreneurship, development, and the world capitalist system. Diaspora 6(2):215–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bolton B, Thompson J (2004) Entrepreneurs: talent, temperament, technique. Routledge, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  13. Brinkerhoff JM (2009) Digital diasporas: identity and transnational engagement. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Brubaker R (2005) The “diaspora” diaspora. Ethnic Racial Stud 28(1):1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Buckley PJ, Ghauri PN (2004) Globalisation, economic geography and the strategy of multinational enterprises. J Int Bus Stud 35(2):81–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Burns P (2001) Entrepreneurship and small business. Palgrave Macmillan, BasingstokeGoogle Scholar
  17. Caprar DV (2011) Foreign locals: a cautionary tale on the culture of MNC local employees. J Int Bus Stud 42(5):608–628CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Carmichael BA, Drori I, Honig B (eds) (2010) Transnational and immigrant entrepreneurship in a globalized world. University of Toronto Press, TorontoGoogle Scholar
  19. Cassis Y, Minoglou IP (eds) (2005) Entrepreneurship in theory and history. Palgrave Macmillan, BasingstokeGoogle Scholar
  20. Chand M, Ghorbani M (2011) National culture, networks and ethnic entrepreneurship: a comparison of the Indian and Chinese immigrants in the US. Int Bus Rev 20(6):593–606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Chaudhry S, Crick D (2004) The business practices of small Chinese restaurants in the UK: an exploratory investigation. Strateg Chang 13(1):37–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Chlenov M (Ed.) (2009) Euro-Asian Jewish Yearbook—5768 (2007/2008). M.: Pallada, 2009. http://library-en.eajc.org//data/image/books/18/0/180_d.pdf
  23. Chung HFL, Tung RL (2013) Immigrant social networks and foreign entry: Australia and New Zealand firms in the European Union and Greater China. Int Bus Rev 22:18–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Cohen JH (2005) Remittance outcomes and migration: theoretical contests, real opportunities. Stud Int Comp Devel 40:88–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Cohen R (2008) Global diasporas: an introduction, 2nd edn. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  26. Coudouel A, Marnie S, Micklewright J (1998) Targeting social assistance in a transition economy: the mahallas in Uzbekistan. UNICEF International Child Development Centre, FlorenceGoogle Scholar
  27. Debass T, Ardovino M (2009) Diaspora direct investment (DDI): The untapped resources for development. United States Agency for International Development. USAID publication, website: http://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/PNADO983.pdf
  28. Denzin NK (1978) The research act: a theoretical orientation to sociological methods. Aldine, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  29. Doing Business in Uzbekistan (2009) Baker & McKenzie-CIS Limited. Tashkent, Uzbekistan, January 2009, pp 1–62Google Scholar
  30. Drori I, Honig B, Ginsberg A (2006) Transnational entrepreneurship: toward a unifying theoretical framework. Acad Manag Proc 2006(1):Q1–Q6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Drori I, Honig B, Wright M (2009) Transnational entrepreneurship: an emergent field of study. Enterp Theory Pract 33(5):1001–1022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Dunning JH (2006) Towards a new paradigm of development: implications for the determinants of international business. Transl Corp 15(1):173–227Google Scholar
  33. Eisenhardt KM (1989) Building theories from case study research. Acad Manag Rev 14(4):532–550Google Scholar
  34. Ellis P, Pecotich A (2001) Social factors influencing export initiation in small and medium-sized enterprises. J Mark Res 38:119–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Elo M (2013) Diaspora entrepreneurs in and from an emerging market: narratives from Uzbekistan. Paper presented at the 12th Vaasa International Business Conference, Vaasa, Finland, 21–23 August 2013Google Scholar
  36. Elo M, Jokela P (2014) Social ties, Bukharian Jewish diaspora and entrepreneurship: Narratives from entrepreneurs. In: Rapoo C, Coelho ML, Sarwar Z (eds) New perspectives in diaspora experience. Oxford: Inter-Disciplinary Press, https://www.interdisciplinarypress.net/online-store/ebooks/diversity-and-recognition/new-perspectives-in-diasporic-experience
  37. Elo M, Harima A, Freiling J (2015) To Try or Not to Try? A story of diaspora entrepreneurship. In: van Tulder R, Verbeke A, Drogendijk R (eds) The Future of Global Organizing. Progress in International Business Research, vol 10. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, pp 283–293Google Scholar
  38. Enderwick P, Tung RL, Chung HFL (2011) Immigrant effects and international business activity: an overview. J Asia Bus Stud 5(1):6–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Fischer E, Reuber AR (2001) Action frames for initiating exporting: antecedents and consequences for new and small firms. Paper presented at American Marketing Association Winter Educator’s Meeting, Phoenix, AZ, February 2001, pp 1–61Google Scholar
  40. Ghauri P (2004) Designing and conducting case studies in international business research. Handbook of qualitative research methods for international business. In: Marschan-Piekkari R, Welch C (eds.) Handbook of qualitative research methods for international business (pp. 109–124). Edward Elgar Publishing, doi: 10.4337/9781781954331.00019
  41. Ghauri PN, Grønhaug K (2010) Research methods in business studies, 4th edn. Pearson Education, HarlowGoogle Scholar
  42. Gill N, Bialski P (2011) New friends in the new places. Network formation among the Poles in the UK. Geoforum 42:241–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Gillespie K, Riddle L, Sayre E, Sturges D (1999) Diaspora interest in homeland investment. J Int Bus Stud 30(3):623–634CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Golafshani N (2003) Understanding reliability and validity in qualitative research. Qual Rep 8(4):597–607Google Scholar
  45. Granovetter M (1973) The strength of weak ties. Am J Sociol 78:1360–1380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Granovetter M (1985) Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness. Am J Sociol 91:481–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Halinen A, Törnroos JÅ, Elo M (2013) Network process analysis: an event-based approach to study business network dynamics. Ind Mark Manag 42(8):1213–1222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Hanks RR (2000) Emerging spatial patterns of demographics, labour force and FDI in Uzbekistan. Cent Asian Surv 19(3–4):348–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Harima A (2015) The role of local partners for descending diaspora entrepreneurship: overcoming liability of foreignness. Am J Entrepreneurship 8(2):67–89Google Scholar
  50. Harvey W (2008) The strong or weak ties? British and Indian expatriates finding jobs in Boston. Glob Netw 8:453–473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Heilbrunn S, Kushnirovich N, Zeltzer-Zubida A (2010) Barriers to immigrants’ integration into the labor market: modes and coping. Int J Intercultural Relat 34(3):244–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Heinonen J (2010) Maahanmuuttajayrittäjät ja vastuullinen liiketoiminta, kokemuksia, käsityksiä ja käytäntöjä. Coreco-hanke, Uskontotiede, Turun Yliopisto, TurkuGoogle Scholar
  53. Hepp A, Bozdag C, Suna L (2011) Mediale Migranten, VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Wiesbaden, GermanyCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Irnazarov FK (2009) Transition strategies in Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan since independence: paradoxes and prospects. Emerging Market Economies in Central Asia: The Role of Insitutional Complementarities in Reform Processes-Project, Private University of Applied Sciences Göttingen, Germany, February 2009Google Scholar
  55. Javorcik BS, Özden C, Spatareanu M, Neagu C (2011) Migrant networks and foreign direct investment. J Dev Econ 94:231–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Jenssen JI, Kristiansen S (2004) Sub-cultures and entrepreneurship: the value of social capital in Tanzanian business. J Entrep 13(1):1–27Google Scholar
  57. Jick TD (1979) Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: triangulation in action. Adm Sci Q 24(4):602–611Google Scholar
  58. Johanson J, Mattsson LG (1988) Internationalization in industrial systems—a network approach. In: Hood N, Vahlne JE (eds) Strategies in global competition. Croom Helm, New York, pp 287–314Google Scholar
  59. Jones MV, Nummela N (2008) International entrepreneurship: expanding the domain and extending our research questions. Eur Manag J 26(6):349–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Jones MV, Coviello N, Tang YK (2011) International entrepreneurship research (1989–2009): a domain ontology and thematic analysis. J Bus Ventur 26(6):632–659CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Joronen T, Ali AA (2000) Maahanmuuttajien yritystoiminta Suomessa 1990-luvulla. In: Trux ML (ed) Aukeavat ovet-kulttuurinen moninaisuus Suomen elinkeinoelämässä. WSOY, Helsinki, pp 203–260Google Scholar
  62. Kaplan J (2003) Patterns of entrepreneurship. Wiley, Englewood CliffsGoogle Scholar
  63. Khakhar P, Rammal HG (2013) Culture and business networks: international business negotiations with Arab managers. Int Bus Rev 22:578–590CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Khalmurzaev NA (2000) Small and medium-sized enterprises in the transition economy of Uzbekistan: conditions and perspectives. Cent Asian Surv 19(2):281–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Kotabe M, Riddle L, Sondergger P, Täube F (2013) Diaspora investments and entrepreneurship: the role of people, their movements and capital in the international economy. J Int Manag 19:3–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Kottak C (2006) Mirror for humanity. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  67. Kundu SK, Katz JA (2003) Born-international SMEs: BI-level impacts of resources and intentions. Small Bus Econ 20(1):25–47Google Scholar
  68. Kuula A (2006) Tutkimusetiikka: aineistojen hankinta, käyttö ja säilytys. Vastapaino, TampereGoogle Scholar
  69. Kuznetsov Y (2008) Mobilizing intellectual capital of diasporas: from the first movers to a virtuous cycle. J Intellect Cap 9(2):264–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Kyle D (1999) The Otavalo trade diaspora: social capital and transnational entrepreneurship. Ethnic Racial Stud 22(2):422–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Lähdesmäki M, Savela T (2006) Tutkimus maahanmuuttajien yrittäjyyskoulutuksen vaikuttavuudesta. Case Pro Maahanmuuttajayrittäjäkoulutus (Web reports no.19). Turku, Siirtolaisuusinstituutti. Retrieved from http://www.migrationsinstitute.fi/pdf/webreports19.pdf
  72. Lasch F, Dana LP (2011) Contrasting contexts for entrepreneurship: capitalism by Kyrgyz Decree compared to gradual transition in Uzbekistan. J Small Bus Entrep 24(3):319–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Leinonen J (2012) “Money is not everything and that’s the bottom line”: family ties in transatlantic elite migrations. Soc Sci Hist 36:2 (Summer 2012) Google Scholar
  74. Libman A (2008) Regional integration in Central Asia: a firm-centered view. University of Muenchen. Retrieved from http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/10939/
  75. Light I, Gold S (2000) Ethnic economies. Academic Press, San Diego, CAGoogle Scholar
  76. Lin X (2010) The diaspora solution to innovation capacity development: immigrant entrepreneurs in the contemporary world. Thunderbird Int Bus Rev 52(2):123–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Majidov T (2007) Entrepreneurship and business in Uzbekistan: historical perspective and current obstacles (Unpublished PhD dissertation). University of Stirling, Stirling, UK. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/1893/321
  78. Marschan-Piekkari R, Welch D, Welch L (1999) In the shadow: the impact of language on structure, power and communication in the multinational. Int Bus Rev 8(4):421–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Mayer SD, Harima A, Freiling J (2016) Network benefits for Ghanaian diaspora and returnee entrepreneurs. Entrep Bus Econ Rev 3(3):95–122Google Scholar
  80. McDougall PP, Oviatt BM (2000) International entrepreneurship: the intersection of two research paths. Acad Manag J 43(5):902–906CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Menzies TV, Brenner GA, Filion LJ, Lowry L, Perreault C, Ramagalahy C (2000) Transnational entrepreneurship and bootstrap capitalism: social capital, networks and ethnic minority entrepreneurs. École des hautes études commerciales, Chaire d’entrepreneurship Maclean Hunter. Paper presented at the 2nd Biennial McGill Conference on International Entrepreneurship: Researching New Frontiers, McGill University, Montreal, 23–25 September 2000Google Scholar
  82. Meyer KE, Estrin S, Bhaumik SK, Peng MW (2009) Institutions, resources, and entry strategies in emerging economies. Strateg Manag J 30(1):61–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Michailova S (2011) Contextualizing in international business research: why do we need more of it and how can we be better at it? Scand J Manag 27(1):129–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Michailova S, Liuhto K (2001) Organization and management research in transition economies: towards improved research methodologies. J East–West Bus 6(3):7–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Minoglou IP (2005) Toward a typology of Greek diaspora entrepreneurship. Diaspora entrepreneurial networks. Five centuries of history. Berg, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  86. Mullings B (2011) Diaspora strategies, skilled migrants and human capital enhancement in Jamaica. Glob Netw 11(1):24–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Newland K, Tanaka H (2010) Mobilizing diaspora entrepreneurship for development. Diasporas & Development Project, Migration Policy Institute, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  88. Nkongolo-Bakenda JM, Chrysostome EV (2013) Engaging diasporas as international entrepreneurs in developing countries: in search of determinants. J Int Entrep 11(1):30–64Google Scholar
  89. Ochildiev D, Pinkhasov R, Kalontarov I (2007) A history and culture of the Bukharian Jews. Club Roshnoyi-Light, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  90. Ojo S (2012) Ethnic enclaves to diaspora entrepreneurs: a critical appraisal of black British Africans’ transnational entrepreneurship in London. J Afr Bus 13(2):145–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Peng MW (2003) Institutional transitions and strategic choices. Acad Manag Rev 28(2):275–296Google Scholar
  92. Peng MW, Luo Y (2000) Managerial ties and firm performance in a transition economy: the nature of a micro–macro link. Acad Manag J 43(3):486–501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Pettigrew AM (1990) Longitudinal field research on change: theory and practice. Organ Sci 1(3):267–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Piekkari R, Plakoyiannaki E, Welch C (2010) “Good” case research in industrial marketing: insights from research practice. Ind Mark Manag 39(1):109–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Poros MV (2011) Migrant social networks: vehicles for migration, integration, and development. Social Networks, http://www.migrationpolicy.org/article/migrant-social-networks-vehicles-migration-integration-and-development/
  96. Portes A, Guarnizo LE, Haller WJ (2002) Transnational entrepreneurs: an alternative form of immigrant economic adaptation. Am Sociol Rev 67(2):278–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Poutziouris P, Wang Y, Chan S (2002) Chinese entrepreneurship: the development of small family firms in China. J Small Bus Enterp Dev 9(4):383–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Putz R (2003) Culture and entrepreneurship—remarks on transculturality as practice. Tijdschr Econ Soc Geogr 94:554–563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Riddle L (2008) Diasporas: exploring their development potential. J Microfinance/ESR Rev 10(2):28–35Google Scholar
  100. Riddle L, Brinkerhoff J (2011) Diaspora entrepreneurs as institutional change agents: the case of Thamel.com. Int Bus Rev 20(6):670–680CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Riddle L, Hrivnak AG, Nielsen TM (2010) Transnational entrepreneurs in the emerging markets. Bridging international divides. J Int Manag 16:398–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Salmi A (2010) International research teams as analysts of industrial business networks. Ind Mark Manag 39(1):40–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Sattarov K (2012) Determinants of foreign direct investment in transition economies: a case study of Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan. (Unpublished master’s thesis). Umeå Universität, Umeå, SwedenGoogle Scholar
  104. Schotter A, Abdelzaher D (2013) The boundary spanning effects of the Muslim diaspora on the internationalization processes of firms from Organization of Islamic Conference countries. J Int Manag 19(1):82–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Seo S (2010) A comparative study of the Korean, German and Polish diasporas in the Russian Far-East and Central Asia and the results of repatriation to their homelands. Asian Soc Sci 6(4):61–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Silverman D (2001) Interpreting qualitative data. Methods for analysing talk, text and interaction. Sage Publications, LondonGoogle Scholar
  107. Sinkovics RR, Alfoldi EA (2012) Progressive focusing and trustworthiness in qualitative research. Manag Int Rev 52(6):817–845CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Sinkovics RR, Penz E (2011) Multilingual elite-interviews and software-based analysis. Int J Mark Res 53(5):705–724CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Smallbone D, Welter F (2008) Entrepreneurship and small business development in post-socialist economies. London, RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  110. Stake RE (1995) The art of case study research. Sage Publications, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  111. Stark M (2010) The developmental state as a reference model for transition economies in Central Asia. Emerging Market Economies in Central Asia: The Role of Institutional Complementarities in Reform Processes-project, Private University of Applied Sciences Göttingen, Germany, 2010Google Scholar
  112. Suhir E, Kovach Z (2003) Administrative barriers to entrepreneurship in Central Asia. Center for International Private Enterprise, http://www.cipe.org/pdf/publications/fs/suhirkovach.pdf
  113. Tung R (2008) Brain circulation, diaspora, and international competitiveness. Eur Manag J 26:298–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Urbano D, Toledano N, Ribeiro-Soriano D (2011) Socio-cultural factors and transnational entrepreneurship: a multiple case study in Spain. Int Small Bus J 29(2):119–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Vaaler PM (2011) Immigrant remittances and the venture investment environment of developing countries. J Int Bus Stud 42(9):1121–1149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Vertovec S (1999) Conceiving and researching transnationalism. Ethnic Racial Stud 22(2):447–462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Vertovec S (2009) Transnationalism. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  118. Vertovec S, Cohen R (eds) (2002) Conceiving cosmopolitanism: theory, context and practice. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  119. Vissak T, Zhang X (2012) The activities of Chinese immigrant entrepreneurs in Canada and China: a case study. Paper presented at the 38th Annual Conference of the European International Business Academy (EIBA), University of Sussex, UK, 7–9 December 2012Google Scholar
  120. Voldnes G, Grønhaug K, Sogn-Grundvåg G (2014) Conducting qualitative research in Russia: challenges and advice. J East–West Bus 20(3):141–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. Waldringer R, Aldrich H, Ward R (1990) Ethnic entrepreneurs: immigrant business in industrial societies. Sage Publications, Newbury ParkGoogle Scholar
  122. Weijer C, Goldsand G, Emanuel EJ (1999) Protecting communities in research: current guidelines and limits of extrapolation. Nat Genet 23(3):275–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Welch C, Piekkari R, Plakoyiannaki E, Paavilainen-Mäntymäki E (2010) Theorising from case studies: towards a pluralist future for international business research. J Int Bus Stud 42(5):740–762CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. Welter F (2011) Contextualizing entrepreneurship—conceptual challenges and ways forward. Enterp Theory Pract 35(1):165–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. Welter F, Smallbone D (2010) The embeddedness of women’s entrepreneurship in a transition context. In: Brush CG, de Bruin A, Gatewood EJ, Henry C (eds) Women entrepreneurs and the global environment for growth: a research perspective. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, pp 96–117Google Scholar
  126. Welter F, Smallbone D, Isakova NB (eds) (2006) Enterprising women in transition economies. Ashgate Publishing, Ltd., BurlingtonGoogle Scholar
  127. Wong S, Salaff J (1998) Network capital: emigration from Hong Kong. Br J Sociol 49:358–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. Wright M, Filatotchev I, Hoskisson RE, Peng MW (2005) Strategy research in emerging economies: challenging the conventional wisdom. Guest editors’ introduction. J Manag Stud 42(1):1–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. Wymenga P, Spanikova V, Barker A, Konings J, Canton E (2012) EU SMEs in 2012: at the crossroads (Annual report on small and medium-sized enterprises in the EU, 2011/12). European Commission, RotterdamGoogle Scholar
  130. Xavier R, Kelley D, Kew J, Herrington M, Vorderwuelbecke (2012) Global entrepreneurship monitor (2012 global report. GEM, WellesleyGoogle Scholar
  131. Yin R (1984) Case study research. Sage, Beverly HillsGoogle Scholar

Other sources:

  1. Internationalisation of European SMEs, Final Report, 2010 (2010) EU.Google Scholar
  2. Investment policy review of Uzbekistan 1999 (1999) UNCTAD, UN, New York & Geneva, 1999Google Scholar
  3. Statistical Review of Uzbekistan 2013.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Turku School of EconomicsUniversity of TurkuTurkuFinland
  2. 2.Institute of MigrationTurkuFinland

Personalised recommendations