Journal of International Entrepreneurship

, Volume 4, Issue 2–3, pp 69–81

Business models and market entry mode choice of small software firms

Article

Abstract

So far the critical choice of the entry mode for a target country has been examined ignoring the special features of firms. Particularly, the impact of the wide variation of business models of software firms has been ignored. This multi case study investigates the relation between the business model and the entry mode, of eight software firms. The results imply that the product strategy and the service and implementation model of a software firm are closely connected to the entry mode choice, while the distribution model of intangible software products does not seem to have an impact on the operation mode.

Keywords

Entry mode Market entry Business models Software Small firms 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bakos Y, Brynjolfsson E (1999) Bundling information goods: pricing, profits, and efficiency. Manag Sci 45(12):1613–1630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bell J (1995) The internationalization of small computer software firms: a further challenge to “stage” theories. Eur J Market 29(8):60–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bell J (1997) A comparative study of the export problems of small computer software exporters in Finland, Ireland and Norway. Int Bus Rev 6(6):585–604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bell J, McNaughton R, Young S, Crick D (2003) Towards an integrative model of firm internationalization. J Int Entrepr 1(1):339–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bradley F, Gannon M (2000) Does the firm’s technology and marketing profile affect foreign market entry? J Int Market 8(4):12–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brouthers KD (1995) The influence of international risk on entry mode strategy in the computer software industry. Manag Int Rev 35(1):7–28Google Scholar
  7. Brouthers KD, Brouthers LE, Werner S (1996) Dunning’s eclectic theory and the smaller firm: the impact of ownership and location advantages on the choice of entry-modes in the computer software industry. Int Bus Rev 5(4):377–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brouthers KD, Nakos G (2004) SME entry mode choice and performance: a transaction cost perspective. Entrepr Theory Prac 28(3):229–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brouthers KD, Van de Kruis YM (1997) Competing in software: strategies for Europe’s niche business. Long Range Planning 30(4):518–528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Buckley PJ, Casson M (1981) The optimal timing of a foreign direct investment. Econ J 91(361):75–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Burgel O, Murray GC (2000) The international market entry choice of start-up companies in high-technology industries. J Int Market 8(2):33–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Coviello N, Munro H (1997) Network relationships and the internationalisation process of small software firms. Int Bus Rev 6(4):361–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Crick D, Spence M (2005) The internationalisation of ‘high performing’ UK high-tech SMEs: a study of planned and unplanned strategies. Int Bus Rev 14(2):167–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Currie WL (2004) Value creation from the application service provider e-business model: the experience of four firms. J Enter Inform Manag 17(2):117–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Czinkota MR, Kotabe M (2000) Entering the Japanese market: a reassessment of foreign firms’ entry and distribution strategies. Indus Market Manag 29(6):483–491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dunning JH (1988) The eclectic paradigm of international production: a restatement and some possible extensions. J Int Bus Stud 19(1):1–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Eisenhardt KM (1989) Building theories from case study research. Acad Manag Rev 14(4):532–550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ellis P (2000) Social ties and foreign market entry. J Int Bus Stud 31(3):443–469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hoch D, Roeding C, Purkert G, Lindner S, Müller R (2000) Secrets of software success: management insights from 100 software firms around the world. Harvard Business School Press, USAGoogle Scholar
  20. Jain S, Kannan PK (2002) Pricing of information products on online servers: issues, models, and analysis. Manag Sci 48(9):1123–1142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Johanson J, Mattsson L-G (1988) Internationalisation in industrial systems—a network approach’. In: Hood N, Vahlne J-E (eds) Strategies in global competition. Croom Helm, London, pp. 287–314Google Scholar
  22. Johanson J, Vahlne J-E (1977) The internationalization process of the firm—a model of knowledge development and increasing foreign commitments. J Int Bus Stud 8(1):23–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Johanson J, Vahlne J-E (2003) Business relationship learning and commitment in the internationalization process. J Int Entrepr 1(1):83–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Johanson J, Wiedersheim-Paul F (1975) The internationalization of the firm: four Swedish cases. J Manag Stud 12(3):305–322Google Scholar
  25. Jones MV (1999) The internationalization of small high-technology firms. J Int Market 7(4):15–41Google Scholar
  26. Kontio J, Jokinen J-P, Mäkelä MM, Leino V (2005) Current practices and research opportunities in software business models. In: Proceedings of the 7th international workshop on economics-driven software engineering research, St. Louis, USAGoogle Scholar
  27. Lu JW, Beamish PW (2001) The internationalization and performance of SMEs. Strat Manag J 22 (6–7):565–585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Luostarinen R (1979) The internationalization of the firm. Doctoral thesis, A: 30, Helsinki School of Economics, FinlandGoogle Scholar
  29. Luostarinen R, Welch L (1997) International business operations. Kyriiri Oy, FinlandGoogle Scholar
  30. Magretta J (2002) Why business models matter. Harv Bus Rev 80(5):86–92Google Scholar
  31. Mahadevan B (2000) Business models for internet-based e-commerce: an anatomy. California Manag Rev 42(4):55–69Google Scholar
  32. McNaughton RB (1996) Foreign market channel integration decisions of canadian computer software firms. Int Bus Rev 5(1):23–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Miles MB, Huberman AM (1994) Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook. Sage Publications, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  34. Moen O, Gavlen M, Endresen I (2004) Internationalization of small, computer software firms: entry forms and market selection. Eur J Market 39(9/10):1236–1251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Nakos G, Brouthers KD (2002) Entry mode choice of SMEs in central and eastern Europe. Entrepr Theor Prac 27(1):47–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rajala R, Rossi M, Tuunainen VK (2003a) A framework for analyzing software business models. In: Proceedings of the 11th European conference on information systems. Naples, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  37. Rajala R, Rossi M, Tuunainen VK (2003b) Software vendor’s business model dynamics case: TradeSys. Annal Cases Inform Technol 5(1):538–548Google Scholar
  38. Rajala R, Westerlund M, Rajala A, Leminen S (2004) Business models and value nets as the context of knowledge intensive service activities in the software business. LTT Research LTD, Series B 170, Helsinki, FinlandGoogle Scholar
  39. Tikkanen H, Lamberg J-A, Parvinen P, Kallunki J-P (2005) Managerial cognition, action and the business model of the firm. Manag Deci 43(6):789–809CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Williamson O (1985) The economic institutions of capitalism. The Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  41. Yin RK (1994) Case study research: design and methods. SAGE Publications, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  42. Zeng M, Reinartz W (2003) Beyond online search: the road to profitability. California Manag Rev 45(2):107–130Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Computer Science and Information SystemsUniversity of JyväskyläJyväskyläFinland

Personalised recommendations