Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade

, Volume 14, Issue 1, pp 67–81 | Cite as

Duopolists’ Retail Pricing Behavior in Multiple Markets

Article

Abstract

The law of one price asserts that, with costless trade, prices for identical goods in different countries should be equal after accounting for the exchange rate. The empirical literature suggests that exchange rate pass-through to prices is low and that the law of one price fails; instead, firms are more likely to price to market. This study adds to the literature by examining the pricing strategy of comic book firms within the context of the competition’s pricing behavior in a duopoly industry. Comic books, uniquely, display their retail prices in multiple countries on their cover giving us detailed information about the pricing behavior of each individual firm and their competition which allows us to test a pricing-to-market model. We find that an empirical model of an imperfectly applied law of one price outperforms a simple competitive, pricing-to-market model of pricing. Retail exchange rate pass-through rates between Canada and the United States average 76.8 %. This high exchange rate pass-through rate for comic books exists despite the existence of sticky prices and convenience pricing.

Keywords

Law of one price Exchange rate Pass-through Duopoly Pricing-to-market 

JEL classification

D43 L13 F15 

References

  1. Asplund M, Friberg R (2001) The law of one price in Scandinavian duty-free stores. Am Econ Rev 91:1072–1083CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aure RA, Schoenle RS (2012) Market structure and exchange rate pass-through. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas Working Paper 130. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas, DallasGoogle Scholar
  3. Baxter M, Landry A (2012) IKEA: product, pricing, and pass-through. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas Working Paper 132. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas, DallasGoogle Scholar
  4. Bénassy-Quéré A, Fontagné L, Raff H (2011) Exchange-rate misalignments in duopoly: the case of Airbus and Boeing. World Econ 34:623–641CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Biondo AE (2010) The law of one price: survey of a failure. Theor Pract Res Econ Fields 1:168–182Google Scholar
  6. Broda C, Weinstein DE (2008) Understanding international price differences using barcode data. NBER Working Paper 14017. National Bureau of Economic Research, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cecchetti S (1986) The frequency of price adjustment: a study of the newsstand prices of magazines. J Econ 31:255–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Crucini MJ, Shintani M (2008) Persistence in law of one price deviations: evidence from micro-data. J Monet Econ 55:629–644CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Crucini M, Telmer C, Zachariadis M (2005) Understanding European real exchange rates. Am Econ Rev 95:724–738CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Engel C, Rogers JH (1996) How wide is the border? Am Econ Rev 86:1112–1125Google Scholar
  11. Friberg R, Wilander F (2008) The currency denomination of exports—a questionnaire study. J Int Econ 75:54–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ghosh A, Wolf H (1994) Pricing in international markets: lessons from the Economist. NBER working paper 4806. National Bureau of Economic Research, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  13. Goldberg PK, Hellerstein R (2007) A framework for identifying the sources of local-currency price stability with an empirical application. NBER working paper 13183. National Bureau of Economic Research, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  14. Gopinath G, Itskhoki O (2010) Frequency of price adjustment and pass-through. Q J Econ 125:675–727CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gopinath G, Rigobon G (2008) Sticky borders. Q J Econ 123:531–575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gopinath G, Gourinchas P, Hsieh CT, Li N (2011) International prices, costs, and markup differences. Am Econ Rev 101:2450–2486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gron A, Swenson D (1996) Incomplete exchange rate pass-through and imperfect competition: the effect of local production. Am Econ Rev 86:71–76Google Scholar
  18. Haskel J, Wolf H (2001) Why does the law of one price fail? a case study. Scand J Econ 103:545–558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Imbs J, Mumtaz H, Ravn M, Rey H (2005) PPP strikes back: aggregation and the real exchange rate. Q J Econ 120:1–43Google Scholar
  20. Kashyap A (1995) Sticky prices: new evidence from retail catalogues. Q J Econ 105:245–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Knetter M (1989) Price determination by U.S. and German exporter. Am Econ Rev 79:198–210Google Scholar
  22. Knotek E (2011) Convenient prices and price rigidity: cross-sectional evidence. Rev Econ Stat 93:1076–1086CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mathä TY (2009) Regional Mc parity: do common pricing points reduce deviations from the law of one price. Rev World Econ 145:155–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Nakamura E, Zerom D (2010) Accounting for incomplete pass-through. Rev Econ Stat 77:1192–1230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Yan B, Bernard A, Warren P (2007) Industry characteristics and the law of one price. N Am J Econ Financ 18:93–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Economics and FinanceCollege of CharlestonCharlestonUSA

Personalised recommendations