Competitiveness: From a Dangerous Obsession to a Welfare Creating Ability with Positive Externalities
- 769 Downloads
- 58 Citations
Abstract
The attempt to define the term “competitiveness of nations” has reached the phase of decreasing returns. Fortunately, the literature seems to be converging slightly, a tendency, we hope to accelerate. We propose (1) defining competitiveness as “the ability of a country or location to create welfare.” We maintain (2) that a comprehensive evaluation contains an output evaluation and a process evaluation. We claim (3) that the output evaluation (competitiveness achieved) is closely related to a welfare assessment, with a specific slant and stepwise operationalisations. Furthermore, (4) process evaluation (investigating the ability) is related to the analysis of production and technology functions, adding qualitative elements like strategies, and the strengths and weaknesses of a country. This consensus is at variance with the concept of price competitiveness; it sidelines the importance of external balances, while the productivity approach to competitiveness is nested within. Dangerous obsessions and wrong policy conclusions can never be excluded, but are much less likely if we use this approach to competitiveness—as compared to concepts focusing on price competitiveness or on external balances. Specifically, the greater competitiveness of one country must not necessarily go hand in hand with lower competitiveness in other countries. In advanced countries specifically, policies promoting the ability to create welfare will create positive spillovers into other economies.
Keywords
competitiveness welfare evaluation innovation Lisbon strategyJEL Classifications
F10 F15 F43 O31 O40 O57Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- Aiginger, K., “The use of unit values for discriminating between price and quality competition,” Cambridge Journal of Economics, 1996.Google Scholar
- Aiginger, K., “A framework for evaluating the dynamic competitiveness of countries,” Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, vol. 9(2), pp. 159–188, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Aiginger, K., Europe’s Position in Quality Competition, Background Report for “The European Competitiveness Report 2000,” DG Enterprise, Brussels, 2000.Google Scholar
- Aiginger, K., “Revisiting an evasive concept: Introduction to the special issue on competitiveness,” Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, vol. 6(2), 2006.Google Scholar
- Aiginger, K. and Landesmann, M., “Competitive economic performance: The European view,” Conference on Transatlantic Perspectives on US-EU Economic Relations: Convergence, Conflict & Cooperation, Harvard University, April 2002, WIFO Working Paper No. 179, June 2002.Google Scholar
- Aiginger, K. and Peneder, M., Die qualitative Wettbewerbsfähigkeit der österreichischen Industrie, Wien, 1994.Google Scholar
- Aiginger, K. and Wolfmayr, Y., The qualitative competitiveness of transition countries, OECD, April 1996.Google Scholar
- Beck, B., Die internationale Wettbewerbsfähigkeit der schweizerischen Exportindustrie, Paul Haupt Verlag, Bern, Stuttgart, 1990.Google Scholar
- Cantwell, J., “Innovation and Competitiveness,” in Fagerberg, J., Mowery, D.C., Nelson, R.R. (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Innovation, Oxford University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
- Competitiveness Policy Council: Promoting long term productivity. “Third report to the President and the Congress,” Government Printing Office, Washington, 1994.Google Scholar
- Cooper, R.N., “The Competitive Position of the United States,” in Seymour (ed.), The Dollar in Crisis, Burlingame, New York, 1961.Google Scholar
- D’Aspremont, C. and Gevers, L., “Social welfare functionals and international comparability,” in Arrow, K.J., Sen, A.K., Suzumura, K. (eds.), Handbook of Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 1, 2002.Google Scholar
- Europäische Wirtschaft, Die Wettbewerbsposition Europas in der Triade, Jahreswirtschaftsbericht 1994, Nr. 56, 1994.Google Scholar
- Europäische Wirtschaft, Jahreswirtschaftsbericht 1995, Nr. 59, 1995.Google Scholar
- European Commission, European Competitiveness Reports, 1998, Brussels.Google Scholar
- European Commission, Die Wirtschaftsaussichten für die Gemeinschaft: 1994–96, Beiheift A 11/12, 1994.Google Scholar
- European Commission, Jahreswirtschaftsbericht 1995, Nr. 59, 1995.Google Scholar
- European Commission, Competitiveness of European Manufacturing. DG Enterprise, Brussels, 2001.Google Scholar
- Fagerberg, J., “International Competitiveness,” The Economic Journal, vol. 98, pp. 355–374, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Fagerberg, J., “Technology and international differences in growth rates,” Journal of Economic Literature, vol. 33(3), pp. 1147–1175, 1994.Google Scholar
- Fagerberg, J., Verspagen, B., and Von Tunzelmann, N., “The dynamics of technology, trade and growth,” Edward Elgar, 1994.Google Scholar
- Faust, K. and Schedl, H., “The International Competitiveness of German Industry,” IFO-Institut, München, 1984.Google Scholar
- Gordon, R.J., Two Centuries of Economic Growth: Europe Chasing the American Frontier, Paper prepared for the Economic History Workshop, Northwestern University, October 2002.Google Scholar
- Grilo, I. and Koopman, G.J., “Productivity and microeconomic reforms: Strengthening EU competitiveness,” Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, vol. 6(2), 2006.Google Scholar
- Grupp, H., “Science, high technology and the competitiveness of EU countries,” Cambridge Journal of Economics, vol. 19, pp. 209–223, 1995.Google Scholar
- Gutmann, G., Die Wettbewerbsfähigkeit der ostdeutschen Wirtschaft, Schriften des Vereins für Socialpolitik, Band 239, 1994.Google Scholar
- Hatsopoulos, G.N., Krugman, P.R., and Summers, L.H., “U.S competitiveness: Beyond the trade deficit,” Science, vol. 241, pp. 299–307, 1988.Google Scholar
- IMD, “The World Competitiveness Yearbook,” 1994.Google Scholar
- Ketels, Ch.H.M., “Michael Porter’s competitiveness framework—recent learnings and new research priorities,” Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, vol. 6(2), 2006.Google Scholar
- Kloth, H., Stehn, J., et al., Standort Deutschland: Strukturelle Herausforderungen im neuen Europa, Kieler Studien, 265, Tübingen, 1994.Google Scholar
- Kohler, W., “The “Lisbon Goal” of the EU: Rhetoric or substance?” Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, vol. 6(2), 2006.Google Scholar
- Krugman, P., “Competitiveness: A dangerous obsession,” Foreign Affairs, vol. 73(2), pp. 28–44, March–April, 1994a.Google Scholar
- Krugman, P., “The fight over competitiveness: A zero sum debate: Response: proving my point,” Foreign Affairs, vol. 73(4), July–August 1994b.Google Scholar
- Krugman, P., “Making sense of the competitiveness debate,” Oxford Review of Economic Policy, vol. 12(3), pp. 17–25, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Krugman, P.R. and Hatsopoulos, G.N., “The problem of U.S. competitiveness in manufacturing,” New England Economic Review, pp. 18–29, January/February 1987.Google Scholar
- Legler, H., “Zur Position der Bundesrepublik Deutschland im internationalen Wettbewerb,” in Forschungsberichte des Niedersächsischen Instituts für Wirtschaftsforschung, vol. 3, 1982.Google Scholar
- Lippschitz, L. and McDonald, D., “Real exchange rates and competitiveness,” Empirica, vol. 19, pp. 37–69, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Löbbe, K., “Innovationen, Investitionen und Wettbewerbsfähigkeit der deutschen Wirtschaft,” RWI Heft 16: Essen, 1995.Google Scholar
- Marston, R.C., “Real and nominal exchange rate variability,” Empirica, vol. 16, pp. 147–160, 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Mueller, D., “The persistence of profits above the norm,” Economica, vol. 44(176), pp. 369–380, 1977, London School of Economics and Political Science.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- OECD, “Industry and Technology: Scoreboard of indicators,” Paris, 1994.Google Scholar
- OECD, Competitiveness policy: A new agenda DSTI/IND (95)14, Paris, 1995a.Google Scholar
- OECD, Competitiveness: an overview of reports issued in member countries DSTI/IND (95)15, Paris, 1995b.Google Scholar
- OECD/TEP, Technology and the economy. The key relationships, The technology/economy programme, Paris, 1992.Google Scholar
- Orlowski, D., “Die internationale Wettbewerbsfähigkeit einer Volkswirtschaft,” Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht: Göttingen, 1982.Google Scholar
- Oughton, C., “Competitiveness policy in the 1990s,” The Economic Journal, vol. 107(444), 1997.Google Scholar
- Oughton, C. and Whittam, G., “Competition and cooperation in the small firm sector,” Scottish Journal of Political Economy, vol. 44(1), 1997.Google Scholar
- Peneder, M., “Pattern of Industrial Competitiveness,” Wien, 1994.Google Scholar
- Peneder, M., “Wettbewerbsfähigkeit und Standortqualität. Eine Kritik der Länder-Ranglisten,” Wirtschaftspolitische Blätter, vol. 46(3), pp. 170–177, 1999.Google Scholar
- Porter, M.E., “The Competitive Advantage of Nations,” The Free Press: New York, 1990.Google Scholar
- Porter, M.E., “Building the microeconomic foundations of prosperity: Findings from the business competitiveness index,” in Porter, M.E. et al. (eds.), Global Competitiveness Report 2003–2004 of the World Economic Forum. Oxford University Press: Oxford, pp. 29–56, 2004.Google Scholar
- President’s Commission on Industrial Competitiveness, “Global Competition,” Government Printing Office: Washington, 1985.Google Scholar
- Rodrik, D. (ed.), “In Search of Prosperity: Analytic Narratives on Economic Growth,” Princeton University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
- Rodrik, D., Subramanian, A., and Trebbi, F., “Institutions rule: The primacy of institutions over geography and integration in economic development,” Journal of Economic Growth, vol. 9(2), June 2004.Google Scholar
- Schumacher, D., Belitz, H., Haid, A., Hornschild, K., Petersen, H.J., Straßberger, F., and Trabold, H., Technologische Wettbewerbsfähigkeit der Bundesrepublik Deutschland, DIW Beiträge zur Strukturforschung, Heft 155, 1995.Google Scholar
- Scott, B., and Lodge, G. (eds.), US Competitiveness and the World Economy. Harvard Business School Press: Boston, MA, 1985.Google Scholar
- Siggel, E., “International competitiveness and comparative advantage: A survey and a proposal for measurement,” Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, vol. 6(2), 2006.Google Scholar
- Silverberg, G. and Soete, L., “Economics of Growth and Technological Change,” Edward Elgar, 1994.Google Scholar
- Sinn, H.W., Schlingerkurs: Lohnpolitik und Investitionsförderung in den neuen Bundesländern. in Gutmann, G., Die Wettbewerbsfähigkeit der ostdeutschen Wirtschaft, Schriften des Vereins für Socialpolitik, Band 239, 1994.Google Scholar
- Soete, L., “The impact of technological innovation on international trade,” Research Policy, vol. 16, pp. 101–130, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Suntum, U., “Internationale Wettbewerbsfähigkeit einer Volkswirtschaft,” Zeitschrift für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften, vol. 106(5), 1986.Google Scholar
- The German Sachverständigenrat, “Investieren für mehr Beschäftigung,” Jahresgutachten zur wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung, 1981.Google Scholar
- Uri, P., “Bericht über die Wettbewerbsfähigkeit der Europäischen Gemeinschaft,” Luxembourg, 1971.Google Scholar
- Von Tunzelmann, G.N., “Government policy and the long run dynamics of competitiveness,” Structural change and economic Dynamics, vol. 6, pp. 1–21, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- World Economic Forum, The Global Competitiveness Report, 2000.Google Scholar