Revisiting an Evasive Concept: Introduction to the Special Issue on Competitiveness

Article

Abstract

The term competitiveness stems from the analysis of firms and is usually thought to be well defined at the firm level. Today, however, the notion competitiveness has become a prominent concept in the assessment of countries, regions and locations. The competitive advantage of nations and the competitiveness of locations have become important topics in economic policy. Interest in this field has been notably stimulated by the work of Michael Porter. Although the diversity of approaches presented in this issue may appear large to the reader, it is in reality dwarfed by the multiplicity of concepts, articles and books which have been written in reference to the term competitiveness. The vagueness of the general term, the lack of theoretical background, implicit preferences and prejudices, and finally the scope of policy recommendations made in reference to this term have induced outstanding researchers to warn that the term competitiveness of a nation could be dangerous, obsessive, elusive or meaningless.1 The articles presented in this volume share some elements of this critique, but also demonstrate that research is being continued, and that it is indeed relevant to the design and evaluation of economic policy, most notably, the so-called Lisbon Strategy of the European Union.

Keywords

competitiveness welfare evaluation innovation Lisbon Strategy 

JEL Classifications

F10 F15 F43 O31 O40 O57 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aiginger, K., Die internationale Wettbewerbsfähigkeit Österreichs. WIFO: Wien, 1987.Google Scholar
  2. Aiginger, K., “The use of unit values for discriminating between price and quality competition.” Cambridge Journal of Economics, 1996.Google Scholar
  3. Aiginger, K., “A framework for evaluating the dynamic competitiveness of countries,” Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, vol. 9(2), pp. 159–188, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aiginger, K., Europe’s Position in Quality Competition, Enterprise paper for The European Competitiveness Report 2000, 2000.Google Scholar
  5. Krugman, P.R., “Competitiveness: A dangerous obsession.” Foreign Affairs, vol. 73(2), pp. 28–44, March–April, 1994A.Google Scholar
  6. Krugman, P.R., “The fight over competitiveness: A zero sum debate: Response: proving my point.” Foreign Affairs, vol. 73(4), July–August 1994B.Google Scholar
  7. Krugman, P., “Making Sense of the Competitiveness Debate,” Oxford Review of Economic Policy, vol. 12(3), pp. 17–25, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Porter, M.E., “The Competitive Advantage of Nations,” The Free Press, New York, 1990.Google Scholar
  9. Porter, M.E., “Building the Microeconomic Foundations of Prosperity: Findings from the Business Competitiveness Index”, in Porter, M.E. et al. (eds.), Global Competitiveness Report 2003–2004 of the World Economic Forum, Oxford, Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 29–56, 2004.Google Scholar
  10. Wolfmayr, Y., “Trade Performance of CEECs According to Technology Class,” in The Competitiveness of Transition Economies, OECD proceedings, 1998.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Austrian Institute of Economic Research WIFOViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations