Market Concentration and Product Variety under Spatial Competition: Evidence from Retail Gasoline
- 237 Downloads
We show that for a spatially differentiated economy reduced product variety is the likely outcome of mergers except in cases where exit costs in relation to (outlet specific) fixed costs are high. Our empirical analysis of the Austrian retail gasoline market confirms that increases in concentration reduce product variety. Ignoring this product variety effect is likely to lead to an underestimate of market power in structural merger analysis.
Keywordsspatial product differentiation retail gasoline mergers concentration
JEL ClassificationsL11 L13 L90
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Bresnahan, T.F., “Empirical studies of industries with market power,” in Schmalensee, R. and Willig, R.D. (eds.), Handbook of Industrial Organization, vol 2. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1989.Google Scholar
- Clemenz, G. and Gugler, K., “Locational choice and price competition: Some empirical results for the Austrian retail gasoline market,” Empirical Economics, pp. 1–22, Jan 2006.Google Scholar
- Evans, W.N., Froeb, L.M., and Werden, G.J., “Endogeneity in the concentration–price relationship: Causes, consequences, and cures,” Journal of Industrial Economics, vol. XLI(4), pp. 431–438, 1993.Google Scholar
- Ivaldi, M. and Verboven, F., “Quantifying the effects from horizontal mergers in European competition policy,” CEPR WP No. 2697, 2002.Google Scholar
- Ivaldi, M., McCullock, G., and Linari, C., “US railroad mergers: A structural econometric perspective, presented at the EARIE 2002 meeting in Madrid, 2002.Google Scholar
- Pepall, L., Richards, D.J., and Norman, G., Industrial Organization: Contemporary Theory and Practice, 2e. South-Western: Mason, Ohio, 2002.Google Scholar
- Salop, S.C., “Monopolistic competition with outside goods,” The Bell Journal of Economics, vol. 10, pp. 141–156, 1979.Google Scholar