Advertisement

Hybridization increases canopy arthropod diversity in the Quercus affinis × Quercus laurina complex

  • Yurixhi Maldonado-López
  • Marcela Sofía Vaca-Sánchez
  • Antonio González-Rodríguez
  • Ken Oyama
  • Edmundo López-Barbosa
  • Marcilio Fagundes
  • Pablo Cuevas-Reyes
ORIGINAL PAPER

Abstract

Understanding the factors that influence the diversity and composition of arthropod communities is a major topic in ecology. Canopy arthropod communities are a major constituent of biodiversity and show great variation in time and space according to different factors. Recently, genetic variation within tree species has attracted attention as a significant factor determining the diversity and composition of canopy arthropod communities. A major source of genetic and phenotypic novelty in plant species is interspecific hybridization, and therefore it is of interest to evaluate how this process affects the communities of associated organisms. In this study, we used microsatellite markers and geometric morphometry of leaf shape to analyze genetic and morphological variation in 45 individuals in a local hybrid zone between the oaks Quercus affinis and Q. laurina in Mexico. Individual trees were assigned to one of the parental species or to the hybrid category. The percentage of leaf area removed by herbivores was quantified in each individual and the canopies of five individuals of each categeory (two parental species and hybrids) was fogged with insecticide to assess the diversity and composition of arthropod communities. Results indicated that hybrid trees experience higher levels of herbivory than parental species and also sustain a higher abundance and richness of canopy arthropods. In general, our study supports the “hybrid susceptibility hypothesis” that predicts a higher incidence of associated arthropods on hybrid plants than in their parental species as result of the disruption of co-adapted gene complexes associated to resistance traits.

Keywords

Hybrids Quercus laurina × Quercus affinis complex Arthropod diversity Canopy 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This project was supported by CONACYT project CB105755 and DGAPA-PAPIIT-UNAM project RV201015. Cuevas-Reyes P thanks Coordinación de la Investigación Científica UMSNH (Grant No. 111) for their generous support. We also thank Fidel Anguiano for editing figures.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Research involving human participants and/or animals

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Supplementary material

10841_2018_103_MOESM1_ESM.docx (22 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 22 KB)

References

  1. Albarrán-Lara AL, Mendoza-Cuenca L, Valencia-Avalos S, González-Rodríguez A, Oyama K (2010) Leaf fluctuating asymmetry increases with hybridization and introgression between Quercus magnoliifolia and Quercus resinosa (Fagaceae) through an altitudinal gradient in Mexico. Int J Plant Sci 171:310–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aldrich PR, Michler CH, Sun W, Romero-Severson J (2002) Microsatellites markers for northern red aok (Fagaceae: Quercus rubra). Mol Ecol Notes 2:472–474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arizaga S, Martínez-Cruz, Salcedo-Cabrales M, Bello-González MA (2009) Manual de la biodiversidad de encinos michoacanos. SEMARNAT, INE, México, 147 ppGoogle Scholar
  4. Arnold ML (1997) Natural hybridization and evolution. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. Bailey JP, Whitham T (2006) Interactions between cottonwood and beavers positively affect sawfly abundance. Ecol Entomol 31:294–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bailey JK, Bangert RK, Schweitzer JA, Trotter RT III, Shuster SM, Whitham TG (2004) Fractal geometry is heritable in trees. Evolution 59:2100–2102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bangert RK, Whitham TG (2007) Genetic assembly rules and community phenotypes. Evol Ecol 21:549–560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bangert RK, Turek RJ, Martinsen GD, Wimp GM, Bailey JK, Whitham TG (2005) Benefits of conservation of plant genetic diversity on arthropod diversity. Conserv Biol 19:379–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Basset Y, Novotny V, Miller SE, Kitching RL (2003) Arthropods of tropical forests. Spatio-temporal dynamics and resource use in the canopy. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  10. Boecklen WJ, Spellenberg R (1990) Structure of herbivore communities in two oak (Quercus spp.) hybrid zones. Oecologia 85:92–100PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Bookstein FL (1991) Morphometric tools for landmark data: geometry and biology. Cambridge, University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. Bouget C, Brin B, Brustel H (2011) Exploring the “last biotic frontier”: Are temperate forest canopies special for saproxylic beetles? For Ecol Manag 261:211–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brower JE, Zar JH (eds) (1984) Community similarity. In: Field and laboratory methods for general ecology, 3rd edn. W.C. Brown Publishers, DubuqueGoogle Scholar
  14. Brown VK, Lawton JH (1991) Herbivory and the evolution of leaf size and shape. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B 333:265–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chapin FS III, Matson PA, Mooney HA (2002) Principles of terrestrial ecosystem ecology. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. Cheng D, Vrieling K, Klinkhammer PGL (2011) The effect of hybridization on secondary metabolites and herbivore resistance: Implications for the evolution of chemical diversity in plants. Phytochem Rev 110:07–117Google Scholar
  17. Cuevas-Reyes P, Oyama K, González-Rodríguez A, Fernandes GW, Mendoza-Cuenca L (2011) Contrasting herbivory patterns and leaf fluctuating asymmetry in Heliocarpus pallidus between different habitat types within a Mexican tropical dry forest. J Trop Ecol 27:383–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cuevas-Reyes P, Gilverti L, González-Rodríguez A, Fernándes GW (2013) Patterns of herbivory and fluctuating asymmetry in Solanum lycocarpum St. Hill (Solanaceae) along an urban gradient in Brazil. Ecol Indic 24:557–561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cuevas-Reyes P, Canché-Delgado A, Maldonado-López Y, Fernandes GW, Oyama K, González-Rodríguez A (2018) Patterns of herbivory and leaf morphology in two Mexican hybrid oak complexes: importance of fluctuating asymmetry as indicator of environmental stress in hybrid plants. Ecol Indic 90:164–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dungey HS, Potts BM, Whitham TG, Li H-F (2000) Plant genetics affects arthropod community richness and com- position: evidence from a synthetic eucalypt hybrid population. Evolution 54:1938–1946PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Earl DA, von Holdt BM (2011) Structure harvester: a website and program for visualizing STRUCTURE output and implementing the Evanno method. Conserv Gen Resour 4:359–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Erwin TL (1983) Beetles and other insects of tropical forest canopies at Manaus, Brazil, sampled by insecticidal fogging. In: Sutton SL, Whitmore TC, Chadwick AC (eds) Tropical rain forest ecology and management. Blackwell Scientific Publications, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  23. Evanno G, Regnaut S, Goudet (2005) Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: a simulation study. Mol Ecol 14:2611–2620PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Floate KD, Whitham TG (1993) The ‘‘hybrid bridge’’ hypothesis: host shifting via plant hybrid swarms. Am Nat 141:651–662PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Floate KD, Godbout J, Lau MK, Isabel N, Whitham TG (2016) Plant-herbivore interactions in a trispecific hybrid swarm of Populus: assessing support for hypotheses of hybrid bridges, evolutionary novelty and genetic similarity. New Phytol 209:832–844PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Fritz RS (1999) Resistance of hybrid plants to herbivores: genes, environment both? Ecology 80:382–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fritz RS, Nichols-Orians CM, Brunsfeld SJ (1994) Interspecific hybridization of plants and resistance to herbivores: hypotheses, genetics, and variable responses in a diverse herbivore community. Oecologia 97:106–117PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Garibaldi LA, Kitzberger T, Ruggiero A (2014) Latitudinal decrease in folivory within Nothofagus pumilio forests: dual effect of climate on insect density and leaf traits? Glob Ecol Biogeogr 20:609–619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. González-Rodríguez A, Arias DM, Valencia S, Oyama K (2004) Morphological and RAPD analysis of hybridization between Quercus affinis and Q. laurina (Fagaceae), two Mexican red oaks. Am J Bot 91:401–409PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Haan NL, Bakker JD, Dunwiddie PW, Linders MJ (2018) Instar-specific effects of host plants on survival of endangered butterfly larvae. Ecol Entomol.  https://doi.org/10.1111/een.12656 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hamilton AJ, Basset Y, Benke KK, Grinbacher PS, Miller SE, Samuelson GA, Stork NE, Weiblen GD, Yen JD (2010) Quantifying uncertainty in estimation of tropical arthropod species richness. Am Nat 176:90–95PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hartvigsen G, Wait DA, Coleman JS (1995) Tri-trophic interactions influenced by resource availability: predator effects on plant performance depend on plant resources. Oikos 74:463–468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hochwender CG, Fritz RS (2004) Plant genetic differences influence herbivore community structure evidence from a hybrid willow system. Oecologia 138:547–557PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hubisz MJ, Falush D, Stephens M, Pritchard JK (2009) Inferring weak population structure with the assistance of sample group information. Mol Ecol Resour 9:1322–1332PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hunter JJ, Volschenk CG, Le Roux DJ, Fouché GW, Adams L (2004) Plant material quality. A compilation of research. ARC Infruitec-Nietvoorbij, Stellenbosch, pp 1–18Google Scholar
  36. Kovach WL (1999) MVSP. A multivariate statistical package for windows, ver. 3.1. Kovach Computing Services. PentraethGoogle Scholar
  37. LeBoldus JM, Isabel N, Floate KD, Blenis P, Thomas BR (2013) Testing the ‘hybrid susceptibility’ and ‘phenological sink’ hypotheses using the P. balsamifera–P. deltoides hybrid zone and Septoria leaf spot [Septoria musiva]. PLoS ONE 8:e84437PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lill JT, Marquis RJ (2001) The effects of leaf quality on herbivore performance and attack from natural enemies. Oecologia 126:418–428PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  39. Magurran AE (1988) Ecological diversity and its measurement. Princeton University Press, PrincetonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Majer JD, Recher HF, Ganesh S (2000) Diversity patterns of eucalypt canopy arthropods in eastern and western of Australian. Ecol Entomol 25:295–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Maldonado-López Y, Cuevas-Reyes P, González-Rodríguez A, Pérez-López G, Acosta-Gómez C, Oyama K (2015) Relationships among plant genetics, phytochemistry and herbivory patterns in Quercus castanea across a fragmented landscape. Ecol Res 30:133–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Mäntylä E, Klemola T, Laaksonen T (2011) Birds help plants: a meta-analysis of top-down trophic cascades caused by avian predators. Oecologia 165:143–152PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  43. Marques MI, Adis J, dos Santos GB, Battirola LD (2006) Terrestrial arthropods from tree canopies in the Pantanal of Mato Grosso, Brazil. Rev Bras Entomol 50:257–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Marquis RJ, Whelan CJ (1994) Insectivorous birds increase growth of white oak through consumption of leaf chewing insects. Ecology 75:2007–2014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Martinsen GD, Whitham TG (1994) More birds nest in hybrid Cottonwood trees. Wilson Bull 106:474–481Google Scholar
  46. Martinsen GD, Whitham TG, Turek RJ, Kim P (2001) Hybrid populations selectively filter gene introgression between species. Evolution 55:1325–1335PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  47. Morin PJ (1999) Community ecology. Blackwell Science, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  48. Morin PJ (2003) Community ecology and the genetics of interacting species. Ecology 84:577–580CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Murakami M, Nakano S (2000) Species-specific bird functions in a forest-canopy food web. P Roy Soc Lond B 267:1597–1601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Peakall R, Smouse PE (2006) GENALEX 6: genetic analysis in excel.Population genetic software for teaching and research. Mol Ecol Notes 6:288–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Pearse IS, Baty JH (2012) The predictability of traits and ecological interactions on 17 different crosses of hybrid oaks. Oecologia 169:489–497PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  52. Peñaloza-Ramírez JM, González-Rodríguez A, Mendoza-Cuenca L, Caron H, Kremer A, Oyama K (2010) Interspecific gene flow in a multispecies oak hybrid zone in the sierra Tarahumara of Mexico. Ann Bot 105:389–399PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Pérez-López G, González-Rodríguez A, Oyama K, Cuevas-Reyes P (2016) Effects of plant hybridization on the structure and composition of a highly rich community of cynipid gall wasps: the case of the oak hybrid complex Quercus magnoliifolia x Quercus resinosa in Mexico. Biodivers Conserv 25:633–651CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Petersen MJ, Seto M, Peck D (2013) Linking the spatio-temporal distribution of an edaphic crane fly to its heterogeneous soil environment. Ecol Entomol 38:585–595CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Price PW (1991) The plant vigor hypothesis and herbivore attack. Oikos 62:244–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Price PW, Bouton CE, Gross P, McPheron BA, Thompson JN, Weis AE (1980) Interactions among three trophic levels: influence of plants on interactions be tween insect herbivores and natural enemies. Ann Rev Ecol System 11:41–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P (2000) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155:945–959PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  58. Quintero C, Bowers MD (2018) Plant and herbivore ontogeny interact to shape the preference, performance and chemical defense of a specialist herbivore. Oecologia 187:401–412PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  59. Ramos-Ortiz S, Oyama K, Rodríguez-Correa H, González-Rodríguez A (2016) Geographic structure of genetic and phenotypic variation in the hybrid zone between Quercus affinis and Q. laurina in Mexico. Plant Species Biol 31:219–232.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1442-1984.12109 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Rehill B, Clauss A, Wieczorek L, Whitham T, Lindroth R (2005) Foliar phenolic glycosides from Populus fremontii, Populus angustifolia, and their hybrids. Biochem Syst Ecol 33:125–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Rieseberg LH (1997) Hybrid origins of plant species. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 28:359–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Rieseberg LH, Raymond O, Rosenthal DM, Lai Z, Livingstone K, Nakazato T, Durphy JL, Schwarzbach AE, Donovan LA, Lexer C (2003) Major ecological transitions in wild sunflowers facilitated by hybridization. Science 301:1211–1216PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  63. Sarfraz M, Dosdall LM, Keddie BA (2008) Host plant genotype of the herbivore Plutella xylostela (Lepidopetera: Plutellidae) affects the performance of its parasitoid Diadegma insulare (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae). Biol Control 44:42–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Schönrogge K, Begg T, Stone GN (2013) Native birds and alien insects: spatial density dependence in songbird predation of invading oak gall wasps. PLoS ONE 8:e53959PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Smouse PE, Peakall R (1999) Spatial autocorrelation analysis of individual multiallele and multilocus genetic structure. Heredity 82:561–573PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  66. Sobek S, Steffan-Dewenter I, Scherber C, Tschamtke T (2009) Spatio temporal changes of beetle communities across a tree diversity gradient. Divers Distrib 15:660–670CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Southwood TRE (1973) The insect/plant relationship-an evolutionary perspective. In van Emden HF (ed) Insect/plant relationship, No. 6. Symposia of the Royal Entomological Society, London, pp. 3–30Google Scholar
  68. Speight MR, Hunter MD, Watt AD (1999) Ecology of insects: concepts and applications. Blackwell Science, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  69. Stokes ME, Davis CS, Koch GG (2000) Categorical data analysis using the SAS system, 2nd edn. SAS, CaryGoogle Scholar
  70. Stone GN, Schönrogge K (2003) The adaptive significance of insect gall morphology. Tree 18:512–522Google Scholar
  71. Strauss SY (1994) Levels of herbivory and parasitism in host hybrid zones. Trends Ecol Evol 9:209–214PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  72. Tovar-Sánchez E, Oyama K (2004) Natural hybridization and hybrid zones between Quercus crassifolia and Quercus crassipes (Fagaceae) in Mexico: morphological and molecular evidence. Am J Bot 91:1352–1363PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  73. Tovar-Sánchez E, Oyama K (2006a) Community structure of canopy arthropods associated to Quercus crassifolia × Quercus crassipes complex. Oikos 112:370–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Tovar-Sánchez E, Oyama K (2006b) Effect of hybridization of the Quercus crassifolia x Quercus crassipes complex on the community structure on endophagous insects. Oecologia 147:702–713PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  75. Tovar-Sánchez E, Valencia-Cuevas L, Castillo-Mendoza E, Mussali-Galante P, Pérez- Ruíz RV, Mendoza A (2013) Association between individual genetic diversity of two oak host species and canopy arthropod community structure. Eur J For Res 132:165–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Triplehorn CA, Johnson NF, Borror DJ (2005) An introduction to the study of insects. Thompson Brooks/Cole, BelmontGoogle Scholar
  77. Ulyshen MD (2011) Arthropod vertical stratification in temperate deciduous forests: Implications for conservation-oriented management. For Ecol Manag 261:1479–1489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Valencia S (2004) Diversidad del género Quercus (Fagaceae) en México. Bot Soc Bot Mex 75:33–53Google Scholar
  79. Valencia-Cuevas L, Tovar-Sánchez E (2015) Oak canopy arthropod communities: which factors shape its structure? Rev Chil Hist Nat 88:15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Valencia-Cuevas L, Piñero D, Mussali-Galante P, Valencia-Ávalos S, Tovar-Sánchez E (2014) Effect of a red oak species gradient on genetic structure and diversity of Quercus castanea (Fagaceae) in Mexico. Tree Genet Genom 10:641–652CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Van Bael SA, Brawn JD, Robinson SK (2003) Birds defend trees from herbivores in a Neotropical forest canopy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:8304–8307PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Wade MJ (2003) Community genetics and species interactions. Ecology 84:583–585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Whitham TG (1989) Plant hybrid zones as sinks for pests. Science 244:1490–1493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Whitham TG, Morrow PA, Potts BM (1994) Plant hybrid zones as centers of biodiversity—the herbivore community of endemic Tasmanian eucalypts. Oecologia 97:481–490PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  85. Whitham TG, Martinsen GD, Floate KD, Dungey H, Potts BM, Keim P (1999) Plant hybrid zones affect biodiversity: tools for a genetic-based understanding of community structure. Ecology 80:416–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Whitham TG, Bailey JK, Scheweitzer JA, Shuster SM, Bangert RK, LeRoy CJ, Lonsdorf EV, Allan GJ, DiFazio SP, Potts BM, Fischer DC, Gehring CA, Lindroth RL, Marks JC, Hart SC, Wimp GM, Wooley SC (2006) A framework for community and ecosystem genetics: form genes to ecosystems. Nature 7:510–523Google Scholar
  87. Wimp GM, Young PW, Woolbright SA, Martinsen GD, Keim P, Whitham TG (2004) Conserving plant genetic diversity for dependent animal communities. Ecol Lett 7:776–780CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Wimp GM, Martinsen GD, Floate KD, Bangert RK, Whitham TG (2005) Plant genetic determinants of arthropod community structure and diversity. Evolution 59:61–69PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  89. Yang LH, Gratton C (2014) Insects as drivers of ecosystem processes. Curr Opin Insect Sci 2:26–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yurixhi Maldonado-López
    • 1
  • Marcela Sofía Vaca-Sánchez
    • 2
  • Antonio González-Rodríguez
    • 3
  • Ken Oyama
    • 4
  • Edmundo López-Barbosa
    • 5
  • Marcilio Fagundes
    • 6
  • Pablo Cuevas-Reyes
    • 2
  1. 1.CONACYT-Instituto de Investigaciones sobre los Recursos NaturalesUniversidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de HidalgoMoreliaMexico
  2. 2.Laboratorio de Ecología de Interacciones BióticasUniversidad Michoacana de Sán Nicolas de Hidalgo, Ciudad UniversitariaMoreliaMexico
  3. 3.Laboratorio de Genética de la Conservación, Instituto de Investigaciones en Ecosistemas y SustentabilidadUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de MéxicoMoreliaMexico
  4. 4.Escuela Nacional de Estudios Superiores Unidad Morelia, UNAMMoreliaMexico
  5. 5.Laboratorio de AgroecologíaUniversidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de HidalgoMoreliaMexico
  6. 6.Universidade Estadual de Montes Claros, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Biológicas, Departamento de Biologia Geral, Laboratório de Biologia da ConservaçãoMontes ClarosBrazil

Personalised recommendations