Journal of Insect Conservation

, Volume 21, Issue 5–6, pp 897–906 | Cite as

A stag beetle’s life: sex-related differences in daily activity and behaviour of Lucanus cervus (Coleoptera: Lucanidae)

  • Massimiliano Tini
  • Marco Bardiani
  • Alessandro Campanaro
  • Stefano Chiari
  • Franco Mason
  • Emanuela Maurizi
  • Ilaria Toni
  • Paolo Audisio
  • Giuseppe M. Carpaneto
ORIGINAL PAPER
  • 38 Downloads

Abstract

The study of behavioural ecology of rare and elusive species can be challenging, but it is an important issue for monitoring populations in planning conservation actions. This is especially true for arboreal insects inhabiting old-growth forests, whose habits are scarcely known and rely on many anecdotal data, such as the stag beetle Lucanus cervus (Linnaeus, 1758). In order to gather information on daily activity and behaviour of this species, a radio-telemetry study was conducted in a relict broadleaf forest surrounded by intensively cultivated land in northern Italy. During 2014 and 2015, from May to July, 55 stag beetles (34 males, 21 females) were radio-tagged. Most of them were caught with the aid of an entomological hand net, but nine of them were captured by emergence traps set up on deadwood. Visual contact analysis confirmed that stag beetle males were less elusive than females. Males were more frequently radio-tracked in flight, females mostly underground and in proximity of deadwood. Males were mostly observed flying at sunset, and resting or walking on standing trees during the day. The combination of air temperature and humidity determined the optimal weather conditions for male flights (temperature range: 20.7–26 °C, humidity range: 65.5–78.3%). Flying at sunset, mostly performed by males, significantly increased the detectability of the species and supported the selection of the ‘transect walk at dusk’ as the best monitoring method for the stag beetle.

Keywords

Saproxylic beetles Radio-telemetry Detectability Old-growth forests Weather factors Segmented linear regression 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The present paper was supported by the EU project LIFE11 NAT/IT/000252 MIPP “Monitoring Insects with Public Participation” with the contribution of the LIFE financial instrument of the European Union, and by the Regional Park Agency (ARP Lazio) project “Monitoring of saproxylic and xylophagous insect populations in the protected areas of Latium”. A special permit was obtained from the Italian Ministry of Environment for handling and capturing individuals of the target species (collection permit: Ministero dell’Ambiente e della Tutela del Territorio e del Mare—DG Protezione della Natura e del Mare, U.prot PNM 2012–0010890 del 28/05/2012). Our greatest thanks are due to Marco Bologna, who was the Coordinator of the MIPP Beneficiary Roma Tre University. We are also grateful to the staff of the National Forest Service at the State Reserve “Bosco della Fontana”, for facilitations and help. Special thanks are due to Randi Rollins (Ogden, Utah, USA) who voluntarily helped during the fieldwork in 2014, and to Alice Malavasi for the fieldwork assistance in 2015. We thank G. Gerosa and A. Finco of the Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (Brescia, Italy) for weather conditions data recorded by the meteorological station placed inside the Reserve. We thank Alan Gange and Marcos Méndez for precious advice for the improvement of the manuscript. We are grateful to Agnese Zauli (CREA, Florence), Sarah Rossi de Gasperis (Roma Tre University, Rome), Lara Redolfi De Zan (CREA, Florence), Federico Romiti (Roma Tre University, Rome) for useful discussion. A special thank is for Leonardo Vignoli (Roma Tre University, Rome) who gave a precious help in statistical analysis and discussing the results and for Henrietta Pringle for native English speaker editing. The authors would also like to thank the Walt Disney Pictures and Pixar for inspiring the title of this article.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

10841_2017_29_MOESM1_ESM.tif (842 kb)
Online resource 1. A stag beetle male equipped with radio transmitter (LB-2X, 0.31 g; Holohil Systems Ltd., Carp, Ontario, Canada) and marked with a numbered sticker on the right elytron, walking on a tree trunk in the evening. Supplementary material 1 (TIF 842 KB)
10841_2017_29_MOESM2_ESM.pdf (121 kb)
Online resource 2. Number of homing procedures recorded for each activity (Table A) and for each position (Table B) over 24 hours and during the different time slots. Supplementary material 2 (PDF 120 KB)

References

  1. Alexander KNA (2008) Tree biology and saproxylic Coleoptera: issues of definitions and conservation language. Rev Écol (Terre Vie) 63:1–5Google Scholar
  2. Bardiani M, Tini M, Carpaneto GM, Audisio P, Bussola E, Campanaro A, Cini A, Maurizi E, Mason F, Chiari S (2017a) Effects of trap baits and height on stag beetle and flower chafer monitoring: ecological and conservation implications. J Insect Conserv. doi:10.1007/s10841-017-9965-3 Google Scholar
  3. Bardiani M, Chiari S, Maurizi E, Tini M, Toni I, Zauli A, Carpaneto GM, Audisio P (2017b) Guidelines for the monitoring of Lucanus cervus. Nat Conserv 20:37–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beaudoin-Ollivier L, Bonaccorso F, Aloysius M, Kasiki M (2003) Flight movement of Scapanes australis australis (Boisduval) (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Dynastinae) in Papua New Guinea: a radiotelemetry study. Aust Entomology 42(4):367–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boiteau G, Colpitts B (2001) Electronic tags for the tracking of insects in flight: effect of weight on flight performance of adult Colorado potato beetles. Entomol Exp Appl 100:187–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Campanaro A, Hardersen S, Toni I, Grasso DA (2010) Monitoring of Lucanus cervus by means of remains of predation (Coleoptera: Lucanidae). Entomol Gen 33:79–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Campanaro A, Hardersen S, Minari E, Toni I, Mason F (eds), (2014) Piano di gestione della Riserva Naturale Statale e Sito Natura 2000 “Bosco della Fontana”. Aggiornamento 2014–2020 Quaderni Conservazione Habitat, 8. Cierre edizioni, VeronaGoogle Scholar
  8. Campanaro A, Zapponi L, Hardersen S, Mendez M, Al Fulaij N, Audisio P, Bardiani M, Carpaneto GM, Corezzola S, Della Rocca F, Harvey D, Hawes C, Kadej M, Karg J, Rink M, Smolis A, Sprecher E, Thomaes A, Toni I, Vrezec A, Zauli A, Zilioli M, Chiari S (2016) A European monitoring protocol for the stag beetle, a saproxylic flagship species. Insect Conserv Divers 9(6):574–584CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carpaneto GM, Mazziotta A, Coletti G, Luiselli L, Audisio P (2010) Conflict between insect conservation and public safety: the case study of a saproxylic beetle (Osmoderma eremita) in urban parks. J Insect Conserv 14(5):555–565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carpaneto GM, Baviera C, Biscaccianti AB, Brandmayr P, Mazzei A, Mason F, Battistoni A, Teofili C, Rondinini C, Fattorini S, Audisio P (2015) A red list of italian saproxylic beetles: taxonomic overview, ecological features and conservation issues (Coleoptera). Fragm Entomol 47(2):53–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Carpaneto GM, Campanaro A, Hardersen S, Audisio PA, Bologna MA, Mason F (2017) The Project LIFE “Monitoring of Insects with Public Participation” (MIPP): aims, methods and conclusions. Nat Conserv 20:1–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chiari S, Carpaneto GM, Zauli A, Zirpoli GM, Audisio P, Ranius T (2013) Dispersal patterns of a saproxylic beetle, Osmoderma eremita, in Mediterranean woodlands. Insect Conserv Diver 6:309–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chiari S, Zauli A, Audisio P, Campanaro A, Donzelli PF, Romiti F, Svensson GP, Tini M, Carpaneto GM (2014) Monitoring presence, abundance and survival probability of the stag beetle, Lucanus cervus, using visual and odour-based capture methods: Implications for conservation. J Insect Conserv 18:99–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dreisig H (1979) Daily activity, thermoregulation and water loss in the tiger beetle Cicindela hybrida. Oecologia 44:376–389CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Dudley R (2000) The biomechanics of insect flight: form, function, evolution. Princeton University Press, New Jersey, p 478Google Scholar
  16. Fremlin M (2009) Stag beetle (Lucanus cervus,(L., 1758), Lucanidae) urban behaviour. In: Saproxylic beetles. Their role and diversity in European woodland and tree habitats. Proceedings of the 5th Symposium and Workshop on the conservation of saproxylic beetles. Sofia-Moscow: Pensoft Publishers, pp 161–176Google Scholar
  17. Fremlin M, Fremlin DH (2010) Weather-dependence of Lucanus cervus L. (Coleoptera: Scarabaeoidea: Lucanidae) activity in a Colchester urban area. Essex Nat (NS) 27:214–230Google Scholar
  18. Gibb H, Hjältén J, Ball JP, Atlegrim O, Pettersson RB, Hilszczanski J, Johansson T, Danell K (2006) Effects of landscape composition and substrate availability on saproxylic beetles in boreal forests: a study using experimental logs for monitoring assemblages. Ecography 29:191–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hammer Ø, Harper DAT, Ryan PD (2001) Past: paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontol Electron 4:1–9. http://palaeoelectronica.org/2001_1/past/issue1_01.htm. Accessed 13 May 2001
  20. Harvey DJ, Gange AC, Hawes CJ, Rink M, Abdehalden M, Al-Fulaij N, Asp T, Ballerio A, Bartolozzi L, Brustel H, Cammaerts R, Carpaneto GM, Cederberg B, Chobot K, Cianferoni F, Drumont A, Ellwanger G, Ferreira S, Grosso-Silva J, Gueorguiev B, Harvey W, Hendriks P, Istrate P, Jansson N, Jelaska L, Jendek E, Jovic M, Kervyn T, Krenn H, Kretschmer K, Legakis A, Lelo S, Moretti M, Merkl O, Mader D, Palma R, Neculiseanu Z, Rabitsch W, Rodriguez S, Smit J, Smith M, Sprecher-Uebersax E, Telnov D, Thomaes A, Thomsen P, Tykarski P, Vrezec A, Werner S, Zach P (2011) Bionomics and distribution of the stag beetle, Lucanus cervus (L.) across Europe. Insect Conserv Diver 4:23–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hedin J, Ranius T (2002) Using radio telemetry to study dispersal of the beetle Osmoderma eremita, an inhabitant of tree hollows. Comput Electron Agric 35(2):171–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Johansson T, Gibb H, Hjältén J, Pettersson R, Hilszczanski J, Alinvi O, Ball JP, Danell K (2007) The effects of substrate manipulations and forest management on predators of saproxylic beetles. Forest Ecol Manag 242:518–529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mason F (2004) Dinamica di una foresta della Pianura Padana Bosco della Fontana, seconda edizione con linee di gestione forestale. Gianluigi Arcari Editore, MantovaGoogle Scholar
  24. Mason F, Roversi PF, Audisio P, Bologna MA, Carpaneto GM, Antonini G, Mancini E, Sabbatini Peverieri G, Mosconi F, Solano E, Maurizi E, Maura M, Chiari S, Sabatelli S, Bardiani M, Toni I, Redolfi De Zan L, Rossi De Gasperis S, Tini M, Cini A, Zauli A, Nigro G, Bottacci A, Hardersen S, Campanaro A (2015) Monitoring of insects with public participation (MIPP; EU LIFE project 11 NAT/IT/000252): overview on a citizen science initiative and a monitoring programme (Insecta: Coleoptera; Lepidoptera; Orthoptera). Fragm Entomol 47(1):51–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. McCullough EL (2013) Using radio telemetry to assess movement patterns in a giant rhinoceros beetle: are there differences among majors, minors, and females? J Iinsect Behav 26:51–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Nieto A, Alexander KNA (2010) European red list of saproxylic beetles. Publications Office of the European Union, LuxembourgGoogle Scholar
  27. QGIS Development Team (2014) QGIS Geographic Information System. Open Source Geospatial Foundation Project. http://www.qgis.org/. Accessed 1 Nov 2014
  28. R Development Core Team (2015) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R foundation for statistical computing. http://www.r-project.org/. Accessed 14 Aug 2015
  29. Rink M, Sinsch U (2007) Radio-telemetric monitoring of dispersing stag beetles (Lucanus cervus L.): implications for conservation. J Zool 272:235–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rink M, Sinsch U (2011) Warm summers negatively affect duration of activity period and condition of adult stag beetles (Lucanus cervus). Insect Conserv Divers 4(1):15–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Schuck A, Meyer P, Menke N, Lier M, Lindner M (2004) Forest biodiversity indicator: deadwood—a proposed approach towards operationalizing the MCPFE indicator. In: Marchetti M (ed) Monitoring and indicators of forest biodiversity in Europe: from ideas to operationality. European Forest Institute, Joensuu, Finland, pp 49–77Google Scholar
  32. Shepherd BL, Prange HD, Moczek AP (2008) Some like it hot: body and weapon size affect thermoregulation in horned beetles. J Insect Physiol 54:604–611CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Siitonen J (2001) Forest management, coarse woody debris and saproxylic organisms: Fennoscandian boreal forests as an example. Ecol Bull 49:11–41Google Scholar
  34. Sprecher E (2003) The status of Lucanus cervus in Switzerland. In: Proceedings of the second pan-European conference on Saproxylic Beetles. People’s Trust for Endangered Species, London, UKGoogle Scholar
  35. Sprecher-Uebersax E, Durrer H (2001) Verhaltensstudien beim Hirschkäfer mittels Telemetrie und Videoaufzeichnungen. (Coleoptera, Lucanus cervus L.). Mitteilungen der Naturforschenden Gesellschaften beider Basel 5, 161–182Google Scholar
  36. Stokland JN, Siitonen J, Jonsson BG (2012) Biodiversity in dead wood. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Tini M, Bardiani M, Campanaro A, Mason F, Audisio PA, Carpaneto GM (2017a) Detection of stag beetle oviposition sites by combining telemetry and emergence traps. Nat Conserv 19:81–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Tini M, Bardiani M, Campanaro A, Chiari S, Maurizi E, Toni I, Mason F, Audisio P, Carpaneto GM (2017b) Use of space and dispersal ability of a flagship saproxylic insect: a telemetric study of the stag beetle (Lucanus cervus) in a relict lowland forest. Insect Conserv Divers. doi:10.1111/icad.12260 Google Scholar
  39. White GC, Garrott RA (1990) Analysis of wildlife radiotracking data. Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Massimiliano Tini
    • 1
  • Marco Bardiani
    • 2
    • 3
  • Alessandro Campanaro
    • 2
    • 3
  • Stefano Chiari
    • 1
    • 3
  • Franco Mason
    • 4
  • Emanuela Maurizi
    • 1
    • 3
  • Ilaria Toni
    • 2
  • Paolo Audisio
    • 5
  • Giuseppe M. Carpaneto
    • 1
  1. 1.Dipartimento di ScienzeUniversità Roma TreRomeItaly
  2. 2.Centro Nazionale per lo Studio e la Conservazione della Biodiversità Forestale Carabinieri ‘Bosco Fontana’, Sede di Bosco FontanaMarmirolo (Mantova)Italy
  3. 3.CREA – ABP Consiglio per la ricerca in agricoltura e l’analisi dell’economia agraria - Centro di ricerca per l’agrobiologia e la pedologiaFlorenceItaly
  4. 4.Centro Nazionale per lo Studio e la Conservazione della Biodiversità Forestale Carabinieri ‘Bosco Fontana’, Sede di VeronaVeronaItaly
  5. 5.Dipartimento di Biologia e Biotecnologie “C. Darwin”Sapienza Università di RomaRomeItaly

Personalised recommendations