Journal of Insect Conservation

, Volume 18, Issue 5, pp 951–964 | Cite as

Assessing bee (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) diversity of an Illinois restored tallgrass prairie: methodology and conservation considerations

ORIGINAL PAPER

Abstract

Bee species diversity and the effectiveness of four sampling methods were investigated in a west-central Illinois restored tallgrass prairie. Bees were sampled using malaise traps, ground-level pan traps, elevated pan traps, and vane traps. A total of 4,622 bees representing 31 genera and 111 species were collected. Malaise traps collected the greatest number of bees and species, and ground-level pan traps the least. Among the pan traps and vane traps, blue-colored traps collected the greatest abundance and species richness, and yellow traps the least. Chao1 estimator and rarefaction analyses showed that substantial increases in sample sizes would be necessary to achieve asymptotic species richness levels, particularly if ground-level pan traps alone were used. Elevated pan traps and vane traps collected relatively similar species composition. Different colored pan traps at the same height collected more similar species composition than did those at different heights, but species composition of blue ground-level pan traps was relatively similar to elevated pan traps, regardless of color. Indicator species analysis revealed 22 species that were significantly associated with a specific trap type, and 11 species that were associated with a particular pan trap color/elevation. Results of this study show that elevated traps can increase the effectiveness of bee surveys in tallgrass prairie, and that a combination of trap types gives a more complete picture of the bee fauna than does a single survey method. These results should be considered along with cost, ease of use, and goals when planning and designing bee inventories.

Keywords

Pan traps Malaise traps Vane traps Bee inventory Bee sampling methods Grassland bees 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Sam Droege (USGS Patuxent Wildlife Research Center, Beltsville, MD), Rob Jean (Saint Mary-of-the-Woods College, Saint Mary-of-the-Woods, IN), Mike Arduser (Missouri Department of Conservation, St. Charles, MO), and Jared Ruholl (Lewis and Clark Community College National Great Rivers Research and Education Center, Vandalia, IL) for invaluable assistance with bee identifications. We also thank Jennifer Hopwood (The Xerces Society, Omaha, NE) for helpful advice on bee biology and sampling, and Sean Jenkins (Western Illinois University, Macomb, IL) for sharing his knowledge of prairie ecology and management. Prairie Biotic Research, Inc., and the Department of Biological Sciences, College of Arts and Sciences, Graduate Student Research and Professional Development Fund, University Research Council and the Foundation Office of Western Illinois University provided generous funding for this study.

References

  1. Bartholomew CS, Prowell D (2005) Pan compared to malaise trapping for bees (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) in a longleaf pine savanna. J Kans Entomol Soc 78:390–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bartomeus I, Ascher JS, Gibbs J, Danforth BN, Wagner DL, Hedtke SM, Winfree R (2013) Historical changes in northeastern U.S. bee pollinators related to shared ecological traits. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110:4656–4660PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Biesmeijer JC, Roberts SPM, Reemer M, Ohlemueller R, Edwards M, Peeters T, Schaffers AP, Potts SG, Kleukers R, Thomas CD, Settele J, Kunin WE (2006) Parallel declines in pollinators and insect-pollinated plants in Britain and the Netherlands. Science 313:351–354PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bowles ML, Jones MD, McBride JL (2003) Twenty-year changes in burned and unburned sand prairie remnants in northwestern Illinois and implications for management. Am Midl Nat 148:383–393Google Scholar
  5. Buchman SL, Nabhan GP (1996) The forgotten pollinators. Island Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  6. Burkle LA, Marlin JC, Knight TM (2013) Plant–pollinator interactions over 120 years: loss of species, co-occurrence, and function. Science 339:1611–1615PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Byrne A, Fitzpatrick U (2009) Bee conservation policy at the global, regional and national levels. Apidologie 40:194–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cameron SA, Lozier JD, Strange JP, Koch JB, Cordes N, Solter LF, Griswold TL (2011) Patterns of widespread decline in North American bumble bees. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:662–667PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Campbell JW, Hanula JL (2007) Efficiency of Malaise traps and colored pan traps for collecting flower visiting insects from three forested ecosystems. J Insect Conserv 11:399–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cane JH, Minckley RL, Kervin LJ (2000) Sampling bees (Hymenoptera: Apiformes) for pollinator community studies: pitfalls of pan trapping. J Kans Entomol Soc 73:225–231Google Scholar
  11. Chao A, Colwell RK, Lin C-W, Gotelli NJ (2009) Sufficient sampling for asymptotic minimum species richness estimators. Ecology 90:1125–1133PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Davis JD, Hendrix SD, Debinski DM, Hemsley CJ (2008) Butterfly, bee and forb community composition and cross-taxon incongruence in tallgrass prairie fragments. J Insect Conserv 12:69–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Droege S, Tepedino VJ, Lebuhn G, Link W, Minckley RL, Chen Q, Conrad C (2010) Spatial patterns of bee captures in North American bowl trapping surveys. Insect Conserv Divers 3:15–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dufrêne M, Legendre P (1997) Species assemblages and indicator species: the need for a flexible asymmetrical approach. Ecol Monogr 67:345–366Google Scholar
  15. Gibbs J (2010) Revision of the metallic Lasioglossum (Dialictus) of Canada (Hymenoptera, Halictidae, Halictini). Zootaxa 2591:1–382Google Scholar
  16. Gibbs J (2011) Revision of the metallic Lasioglossum (Dialictus) of eastern North America (Hymenoptera: Halictidae: Halictini). Zootaxa 3073:1–216Google Scholar
  17. Giles V, Ascher JS (2006) A survey of the bees of the Black Rock Forest Preserve, New York (Hymenoptera: Apoidea). J Hymenopt Res 15:208–231Google Scholar
  18. Grixti JC, Packer L (2006) Changes in the bee fauna (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) of an old field site in southern Ontario, revisited after 34 years. Can Entomol 138:147–164Google Scholar
  19. Grixti JC, Wong LT, Cameron SA, Favret C (2009) Decline of bumble bees (Bombus) in the North American Midwest. Biol Conserv 142:75–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Guyette RP, Dey DC, Stambaugh MC (2003) Fire and human history of a barren-forest mosaic in southern Indiana. Am Midl Nat 149:21–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hines HM, Hendrix SD (2005) Bumble bee (Hymenoptera: Apidae) diversity and abundance in tallgrass prairie patches: effects of local and landscape floral resources. Environ Entomol 34:1477–1484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Holm S (1979) A simple sequentially selective multiple test procedure. Scand J Stat 6:65–70Google Scholar
  23. Hopwood JL (2008) The contribution of roadside grassland restorations to native bee conservation. Biol Conserv 141:2632–2640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kearns CA, Oliveras DM (2009) Environmental factors affecting bee diversity in urban and remote grassland plots in Boulder, Colorado. J Insect Conserv 13:655–665CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kimoto C, DeBano SJ, Thorp RW, Rao S, Stephen WP (2012) Investigating temporal patterns of a native bee community in a remnant North American bunchgrass prairie using blue vane traps. J Insect Sci 12:108. http://www.insectscience.org/12.108
  26. Klein A-M, Vaissiere BE, Cane JH, Steffan-Dewenter I, Cunningham SA, Kremen C, Tscharntke T (2007) Importance of pollinators in changing landscapes for world crops. Proc R Soc Biol Sci Ser B 274:303–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Krebs CJ (1989) Ecological methodology. Harper and Row, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  28. Kwaiser KW, Hendrix SD (2008) Diversity and abundance of bees (Hymenoptera: Apiformes) in native and ruderal grasslands of agriculturally dominated landscapes. Agric Ecosyst Environ 124:200–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Leong JM, Thorp RW (1999) Colour-coded sampling: the pan trap colour preferences of oligolectic and nonoligolectic bees associated with a vernal pool plant. Ecol Entomol 24:329–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mackay PA, Knerer G (1979) Seasonal occurrence and abundance in a community of wild bees from an old field habitat in southern Ontario. Can Entomol 111:367–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Marlin JC, LaBerge WE (2001) The native bee fauna of Carlinville, Illinois, revisited after 75 years: a case for persistence. Conserv Ecol 5:1–24Google Scholar
  32. McCune B, Grace JB (2002) Analysis of ecological communities. MjM Software Design, Gleneden BeachGoogle Scholar
  33. Michener CD, McGinley RJ, Danforth BN (1994) The bee genera of North and Central America (Hymenoptera: Apoidea). Smithsonian Institution Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  34. Ngo HT, Gibbs J, Griswold T, Packer L (2013) Evaluating bee (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) diversity using Malaise traps in coffee landscapes of Costa Rica. Can Entomol 145:435–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Nuttman CV, Otieno M, Kwapong PK, Combey R, Willmer P, Potts SG (2011) The utility of aerial pan-trapping for assessing insect pollinators across vertical strata. J Kans Entomol Soc 84:260–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ozanne CMP (2005) Sampling methods for forest understory vegetation. In: Leather S (ed) Insect sampling in forest ecosystems. Blackwell Publishing, Malden, pp 58–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ramankutty N, Foley JA (1999) Estimating historical changes in global land cover: croplands from 1700 to 1992. Glob Biogeochem Cycles 13:997–1027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rathcke BJ, Jules ESDA (1993) Habitat fragmentation and plant–pollinator interactions. Curr Sci 65:273–277Google Scholar
  39. Reed CC (1995) Insect surveys on flowers in native and reconstructed prairies (Minnesota). Restor Manag Notes 13:210–213Google Scholar
  40. Richards MH, Rutgers-Kelly A, Gibbs J, Vickruck JL, Rehan SM, Sheffield CS (2011) Bee diversity in naturalizing patches of Carolinian grasslands in southern Ontario. Can Entomol 143:279–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Roulston TH, Smith SA, Brewster AL (2007) A comparison of pan trap and intensive net sampling techniques for documenting a bee (Hymenoptera: Apiformes) fauna. J Kans Entomol Soc 80:179–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sheffield CS, Frier SD, Dumesh S (2014) The bees (Hymenoptera: Apoidea, Apiformes) of the Prairies Ecozone, with comparisons to other grasslands of Canada. In: Giberson DJ, Cárcamo HA (eds) Arthropods of Canadian Grasslands (volume 4): biodiversity and systematics part 2. Biological Survey of Canada, pp 427–467Google Scholar
  43. Stephen WP, Rao S (2005) Unscented color traps for non-Apis bees (Hymenoptera: Apiformes). J Kan Entomol Soc 78:373–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sugar A, Finnamore A, Goulet H, Cumming J, Kerr JT, De Guisti M, Packer L (1998) A preliminary survey of symphytan and aculeate Hymenoptera from oak savannahs in southern Ontario. Proc Entomol Soc Ont 129:9–18Google Scholar
  45. Townes H (1972) A light-weight malaise trap. Entomol News 83:239–247Google Scholar
  46. Tuell JK, Isaacs R (2009) Elevated pan traps to monitor bees in flowering crop canopies. Entomol Exp Appl 131:93–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Ulyshen MD, Soon V, Hanula JL (2010) On the vertical distribution of bees in a temperate deciduous forest. Insect Conserv Divers 3:222–228Google Scholar
  48. Westphal C, Bommarco R, Carrė G, Lamborn E, Morison N, Petanidou T, Potts SG, Roberts SPM, Szentgyőrgyi H, Tscheulin T, Vaissiėre BE, Woyciechowski M, Biesmeijer JC, Kunin WE, Settele J, Steffan-Dewenter I (2008) Measuring bee diversity in different European habitats and biogeographical regions. Ecol Monogr 78:653–671CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ray K. Geroff
    • 1
  • Jason Gibbs
    • 2
  • Kenneth W. McCravy
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Biological SciencesWestern Illinois UniversityMacombUSA
  2. 2.Department of EntomologyMichigan State UniversityEast LansingUSA

Personalised recommendations