Journal of Insect Conservation

, Volume 17, Issue 3, pp 577–590

Effects of managing semi-natural grassland buffers on butterflies

ORIGINAL PAPER

Abstract

Butterflies are important components of biodiversity in grassland ecosystems and provide ecosystem services such as pollination. Although agricultural intensification has led to a scarcity of native grassland habitats within most agricultural landscapes of North America, fragmented remnants and semi-natural habitats may support diverse communities, including butterflies, as long as vital resources such as host plants are available. The United States Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) Conservation Reserve Program practice CP33 Habitat Buffers for Upland Birds (USDA 2004) provides semi-natural grassland habitat in agricultural landscapes, but a knowledge gap exists about impacts of prescribed disturbance (e.g. burning or disking) on butterflies. We monitored butterfly habitat and butterfly communities on experimentally manipulated CP33 grassland buffers in Clay County, Mississippi from 2007 to 2009. Disturbance guild butterfly species richness did not differ among treatments. However, disturbance guild abundance was positively affected by disking in both the first and second growing seasons following disking, and the magnitude of this response varied between years. Effects of burning on disturbance guild abundance did not differ from the control treatment. There were no treatment differences for grassland guild butterfly abundance and species richness suggesting that periodic disturbance does not unduly impact grassland-associated butterflies in the southeastern US. Our results support current USDA practice standards that require periodic disturbance during the 10-year contract, but restrict the disturbance to 1/3 or 1/4 of grassland buffer area in a given year.

Keywords

Butterflies Disking Grassland Prescribed burning 

References

  1. Bachand RR (ed) (2001) The American Prairie: Going, going, gone? A status report on the American prairie. National Wildlife Federation, Rocky Mountain Natural Resource Center, BoulderGoogle Scholar
  2. Benson TJ, Dinsmore JJ, Hohman WL (2007) Responses of plants and arthropods to burning and disking of riparian habitats. J Wildl Manage 71:1949–1957CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bouseman JK, Sternburg JG, Wiker JR (2006) Field guide to the skipper butterflies of Illinois. Illinois Natural History Survey, ChampaignGoogle Scholar
  4. Carvell C, Meek WR, Pywell RF, Nowakowski M (2004) The response of foraging bumblebees to successional change in newly created arable field margins. Biol Conserv 118:327–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Collins S, Gibson D (1990) Effects of fire on community structure in tallgrass and mixed-grass prairie. In: Collins SL, Wallace LL (eds) Fires in North American tallgrass prairies. University of Oklahoma Press, Norman, pp 81–98Google Scholar
  6. Daily GC (ed) (1997) Nature’s services: societal dependence on natural ecosystems. Island Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  7. Dana RP (1991) Conservation management of the prairie skippers Hesperia dacotae and Hesperia ottoe: basic biology and threat of mortality during prescribed burning in spring. Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, pp 594–1991Google Scholar
  8. Davis JD, Hendrix SD, Debinski DM, Hemsley CJ (2008) Butterfly, bee and forb community composition and cross-taxon incongruence in tallgrass prairie fragments. J Insect Conserv 12:69–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Davros NM, Debinski DM, Reeder KF, Hohman WL (2006) Butterflies and continuous conservation reserve program filter strips: landscape considerations. Wildl Soc B 34:936–943CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dietrich CH, Harper MG, Larimore RL, Tessene PA (1998) Insects and fire: too much of a good thing? Ill Nat Hist Survey Rep 349:5Google Scholar
  11. Dinsmore SJ, Jackson LS, Ehresman BL, Dinsmore JJ (1995) Iowa wildlife viewing guide. Falcon Press, HelenaGoogle Scholar
  12. Dollar JG (2011) Responses of butterfly and forb communities to management of semi-natural grassland buffers. Ph.D. Dissertation. Mississippi State UniversityGoogle Scholar
  13. Doxon ED, Carroll JP (2007) Vegetative and invertebrate community characteristics of conservation reserve program fields relative to gamebirds in western Kansas. Am Midl Nat 158:243–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ekroos J, Heliola J, Kuussaair M (2010) Homogenization of lepidopteran communities in intensively cultivated agricultural landscapes. J Appl Ecol 47:459–467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Field RG, Gardiner T, Mason CF, Hill J (2005) Agri-environment schemes and butterflies: the utilization of 6 m grass margins. Biodivers Conserv 14:1969–1976CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Glassberg J (1999) Butterflies through binoculars. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. Greenfield KC, Chamberlain MJ, Burger LW, Kurzejeski EW (2003) Effects of burning and disking in conservation reserve program fields to improve habitat quality for northern bobwhite (Colinus virginianus). Am Midl Nat 149:344–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hale SL, Riffell S, Burger LW, Adams HL, Dollar JG (2011) Fire ant responses to management of native grass field buffers. Am Midl Nat 166:283–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hamrick R, Burger LW, Godwin D (2006) Mississippi’s Conservation Reserve Program: CP33 – Habitat Buffers for Upland Birds. Mississippi bird monitoring and evaluation plan, 2006 annual reportGoogle Scholar
  20. Harper MG, Dietrich CH, Larimore RL, Tessene PA (2000) Effects of prescribed fire on prairie arthropods: an enclosure study. Nat Area J 20:325–335Google Scholar
  21. Harper CA, Bates GE, Hansbrough MP, Gudlin MJ, Gruchy JP, Keyser PD (2007) Native warm-season grasses: identification, establishment and management for wildlife and forage production in the Mid-South. University of Tennessee Extension, KnoxvilleGoogle Scholar
  22. Haufler JB (ed) (2005) Fish and wildlife benefits of farm bill conservation programs: 2000–2005 update. The Wildlife Society Technical Review 05-02, Bethesda, MarylandGoogle Scholar
  23. Huntzinger M (2003) Effects of fire management practices on butterfly diversity in the forested western United States. Biol Conserv 113:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jones J, Coggin DS, Cummins JL, Hill J (2007) Restoring and managing native prairies: a handbook for Mississippi landowners. Wildlife Mississippi, StonevilleGoogle Scholar
  25. Kery M, Plattner M (2007) Species richness estimation and determinants of species detectibility in butterfly monitoring programmes. Ecol Entomol 32:53–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Krauss J, Steffan-Dewenter I, Tscharntke T (2003) How does landscape context contribute to effects of habitat fragmentation on diversity and population density of butterflies? J Biogeogr 30:889–900CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kremen C, Williams NM, Aizen MA, Gemmill-Herren B, LeBuhn G, Minckley R, Packer L, Potts SG, Roulston T, Steffan-Dewenter I, Vazquez DP, Winfree R, Adams L, Crone EE, Greenlead SS, Keitt TH, Klein AM, Regetz J, Ricketts TH (2007) Pollination and other ecosystem services produced by mobile organisms: a conceptual framework of the effects of land-use change. Ecol Lett 10:299–314PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kuussaari M, Heliola J, Poyry J, Saarinen K (2007a) Contrasting trends of butterfly species preferring semi-natural grasslands, field margins and forest edges in northern Europe. J Insect Conserv 11:351–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kuussaari M, Heliola J, Luoto J, Poyry J (2007b) Determinants of local species richness of diurnal Lepidoptera in boreal agricultural landscapes. Agr Ecosyst Environ 122:366–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Littell RC, Milliken GA, Stroup WW, Wolfinger RD, Schabenberger O (2006) SAS systems for mixed models. SAS Institute, CaryGoogle Scholar
  31. Lovell ST, Sullivan WC (2006) Environmental benefits of conservation buffers in the United States: evidence, promise, and open questions. Agric Ecosyst Environ 112:249–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Marshall EJP, Moonen AC (2002) Field margins in northern Europe: their functions and interactions with agriculture. Agric Ecosyst Environ 89:5–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Moran MD (2003) Arguments for rejecting the sequential Bonferroni in ecological studies. Oikos 100:403–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. New TR, Pyle RM, Thomas JA, Thomas CD, Hammond PC (1995) Butterfly conservation management. Annu Rev Entomol 40:57–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Noss R, LaRoe III E, Scott J (1995) Endangered ecosystems of the United States: a preliminary assessment of loss and degradation. US Department of the Interior, National Biological Service. Biological Report 28, p 59Google Scholar
  36. Ockinger E, Smith HG (2007) Semi-natural grasslands as population sources for pollinating insects in agricultural landscapes. J Appl Ecol 44:50–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Olson DM, Wackers FL (2007) Management of field margins to maximize multiple ecological services. J Appl Ecol 44:13–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Opler PA, Malikul V (1992) A field guild to Eastern butterflies. Houghton Mifflin Company, BostonGoogle Scholar
  39. Panzer R (2002) Compatability of prescribed burning with the conservation of insects in small, isolated prairie reserves. Conserv Biol 16:1296–1307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Panzer R (2003) Importance of in situ survival, recolonization, and habitat gaps in the postfire recovery of fire-sensitive prairie insect species. Nat Area J 23:14–21Google Scholar
  41. Panzer R, Schwartz MW (1998) Effectiveness of a vegetation-based approach to insect conservation. Conserv Biol 12:693–702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Peacock E, Schauwecker T (eds) (2003) Blackland prairies of the gulf coastal plain: nature, culture, and sustainability. University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa, p 349Google Scholar
  43. Pollard E, Yates TJ (1993) Monitoring butterflies for ecology and conservation. Chapman & Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
  44. Rands SA, Whitney HM (2010) Effects of pollinator density-dependent preferences of field margin visitation in the midst of agricultural monocultures: a modeling approach. Ecol Model 221:1310–1316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Reeder KF, Debinski DM, Danielson BJ (2005) Factors affecting butterfly use of filter strips in Midwestern USA. Agric Ecosyst Environ 109:40–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Ries L, Debinski DM, Wieland ML (2001) Conservation value of roadside prairie restoration to butterfly communities. Conserv Biol 15:401–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Riffell SK, Gutzwiller KJ, Anderson SH (1996) Does repeated human intrusion cause cumulative declines in avian richness and abundance? Ecol Appl 6:492–505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Riffell SK, Keas BE, Burton TM (2003) Birds in North American Great Lakes coastal wet meadows: is landscape context important? Landscape Ecol 18:95–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Samson F, Knopf F (1994) Prairie conservation in North America. Bioscience 44:418–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Samways M (2007) Insect conservation: a synthetic management approach. Annu Rev Entomol 52:465–487PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Schlicht DW, Orwig TT (1990) Sequential use of niche by prairie obligate skipper butterflies (Lepidoptera: Hesperidae) with implications for management. In: Smith, DD, Jacobs, CA (eds) Proceedings of the twelfth North American prairie conference: recapturing a vanishing heritage. University of Northern Iowa, Cedar Falls, IO, pp 137–139Google Scholar
  52. Schultz CB, Crone EE (1998) Burning prairie to restore butterfly habitat: a modeling approach to management tradeoffs for the Fender’s Blue. Restor Ecol 6:244–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Scott JA (1986) The butterflies of North America. Stanford University Press, StanfordGoogle Scholar
  54. Stoner KJL, Joern A (2004) Landscape vs. local habitat scale influences to insect communities from tallgrass prairie remnants. Ecol Appl 14:1306–1320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Summerville KS, Bonte AC, Fox LC (2007) Short-term temporal effects of community structure of Lepidoptera in restored and remnant tallgrass prairie. Restor Ecol 15:179–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Swengel AB (1996) Effects of fire and hay management on abundance of prairie butterflies. Biol Conserv 76:73–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Swengel SR, Swengel AB (1999) Correlations in abundance of grassland songbirds and prairie butterflies. Biol Conserv 90:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Swengel AB, Swengel SR (2007) Benefit of permanent non-fire refugia for Lepidoptera conservation in fire-managed sites. J Insect Conserv 11:263–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Taron DJ (1997) Insects. In: Packard S, Mutel CF (eds) The tallgrass restoration handbook for prairies, savannas, and woodlands. Society for Ecological Restoration, Washington, DC, pp 305–318Google Scholar
  60. USDA (2004) Practice CP33 habitat buffers for upland wildlife. Farm Service Agency, Notice CRP-479, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  61. USDA (2008) Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008. Title II, Subtitle B–Conservation Reserve Program. http://www.fsa.usda.gov/Internet/FSA_File/2008fbcrpsummay.pdf. Accessed 22 Aug 2012
  62. Van Swaay C, Warren M, Lois G (2006) Biotope use and trends of European butterflies. J Insect Conserv 10:189–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Vogel JA, Debinski DM, Koford RR, Miller JR (2007) Butterfly responses to prairie restoration through fire and grazing. Biol Conserv 140:78–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Vogel JA, Koford RR, Debinski DM (2010) Direct and indirect responses of tallgrass prairie butterflies to prescribed burning. J Insect Conserv 14:663–677CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Weibull A-C, Bengtsson J, Nohlgren E (2000) Diversity of butterflies in the agricultural landscape: the role of farming system and landscape heterogeneity. Ecography 23:743–750CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Weibull A-C, Ostman O, Granqvist A (2003) Species richness in agroecosystems: the effect of landscape, habitat and farm management. Biodivers Conserv 12:1335–1355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Wilkinson NI, Wilson JD, Anderson GQA (2012) Agri-environmental management for corncrake Crex crex delivers higher species richness and abundance across other taxonomic groups. Agric Ecosyst Environ 155:27–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. G. Dollar
    • 1
  • S. K. Riffell
    • 2
  • L. W. BurgerJr.
    • 2
  1. 1.The Xerces Society for Invertebrate ConservationCape May Court HouseUSA
  2. 2.Department of Wildlife, Fisheries and AquacultureMississippi State UniversityMississippi StateUSA

Personalised recommendations